Relating to an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion of the appraised value of tangible personal property that is held or used for the production of income.
CriticalImmediate action required
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-12
Enforcing Agencies
County Appraisal Districts (Chief Appraisers) • Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts • County Tax Assessor-Collectors
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: January 1, 2026 (Contingent on passage of HJR 1 in the November 2025 election).
Compliance Deadline: April 15, 2026 (First deadline to file the new exemption certification or full rendition).
Agency Rulemaking: The Texas Comptroller must prescribe updated rendition forms including "Related Business Entity" checkboxes and non-rendition certifications prior to January 1, 2026.
Immediate Action Plan
Map Your Entities: Immediately identify all legal entities sharing a physical address and sum their BPP values. If the total exceeds $125,000, you are not exempt.
Review D&O Insurance: Confirm your Directors & Officers liability policy covers defense costs for criminal allegations, as the new penalty for false certification falls under the Penal Code.
Prepare Provisional Values: By Q4 2025, have a firm estimate of asset value. If you are borderline ($120k-$130k), plan to file a full rendition to avoid the risk of a false certification charge.
Monitor November 2025 Election: Implementation is strictly contingent on voters approving HJR 1. If it fails, standard taxation applies.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Triple Net (NNN) Leases: Tenants must audit CAM charges to ensure landlords receiving this exemption are passing through the tax savings and not billing for BPP taxes they no longer pay.
Tax Consultant Agreements: Renegotiate scopes of work. If your assets are clearly under $125,000, you should pay for a simple certification filing, not a complex rendition schedule.
Franchise Agreements: Franchisors must update manuals to define how franchisees report assets, specifically regarding equipment owned by the franchisor but located at the franchisee's site.
Hiring/Training
Signatory Risk: CFOs and Controllers must be trained on the new criminal liability (Class A Misdemeanor/State Jail Felony) for false statements.
Entity Mapping: Finance teams must be trained to identify "Related Business Entities" (common enterprise at the same address) rather than treating legal entities as siloes.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Internal Valuation: You can no longer rely on the Appraisal District to set value. You must maintain internal depreciation schedules proving your "reasonable belief" that assets are under $125,000 to defend against audits.
New Certification: Eligible businesses must file a specific statement certifying value is under the limit, rather than a line-item asset list.
Aggregation Records: Documentation proving which entities are—and are not—part of a "common business enterprise" must be maintained for inspection.
Fees & Costs
Tax Savings: Elimination of BPP tax liability for aggregated assets under $125,000.
Admin Costs: Minimal increase in internal administrative time to verify "Related Business Entity" status.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The $125,000 vs. $250,000 Discrepancy: The Fiscal Note analyzes a $250,000 exemption, but the statutory text explicitly states $125,000. You must operationally plan for the $125,000 limit until a technical correction is passed.
"Common Business Enterprise": The statute does not strictly define what constitutes a "common business enterprise" for aggregation. Appraisal Districts may aggressively interpret shared payroll, management, or breakrooms as grounds to force aggregation and deny exemptions.
Leased Property Situs: The interaction between the exemption for leased property (Section 11.145(d)) and the aggregation rules is unclear. Watch for Comptroller rules clarifying how leasing companies report assets across multiple client locations.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
According to the 2022-2023 Biennial Property Tax Report published by the comptroller of public accounts, local property taxes in Texas are rising. Increased property taxes affect all property owners across the state, including many of the state's small business owners. Additionally, taxes on income-producing personal property can impose significant compliance and administrative burdens on businesses. H.B. 9 seeks to address these issues by increasing the business personal property tax exemption from $2,500 to $250,000.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 9 amends the Tax Code to provide for an increase in the value of income-producing tangible personal property subject to exemption from property taxation, contingent on the passage of an applicable constitutional amendment proposed by the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, and to make related changes in the Property Tax Code that are not contingent on the passage of that amendment.
Provisions Contingent on Constitutional Amendment
H.B. 9 changes the exemption from property taxation for tangible personal property a person owns that is held or used for the production of income from an exemption for such property that has a taxable value of less than $2,500 to an exemption for $250,000 of the property's appraised value. The bill conditions the requirement that a person render for taxation tangible personal property the person owns that is held or used for the production of income on the person opining that the aggregate market value of the property in at least one taxing unit that participates in the relevant appraisal district is greater than $250,000.A person required to render property for taxation based on that threshold must render all tangible personal property the person owns that is held or used for the production of income and has taxable situs in the appraisal district. The bill's rendition provisions do not apply to property exempt from taxation under a provision of law other than the provisions providing for an exemption from property taxation for qualifying tangible personal property.
H.B. 9 establishes that these provisions relating to the property tax exemption for certain tangible personal property and rendition requirements apply only to a property tax year that begins on or after January 1, 2025, and take effect on the date on which the constitutional amendment proposed by the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, to authorize the legislature to exempt from property taxation a portion of the market value of tangible personal property a person owns that is held or used for the production of income takes effect. If that constitutional amendment is not approved by the voters, those bill provisions have no effect.
Provisions Not Contingent on Constitutional Amendment
H.B. 9 requires an appraisal district's chief appraiser, when delivering the appraisal roll to the assessor for applicable taxing units for the 2025 tax year, to include a provisional appraisal roll to account for the changes in law attributable to the applicable constitutional amendment proposed by the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, as if those changes were in effect. If the chief appraiser delivers a supplemental appraisal roll or correction to the appraisal roll to a taxing unit's assessor before that constitutional amendment takes effect, the chief appraiser must include provisional appraisal roll entries to account for the changes in law attributable to that constitutional amendment. If that constitutional amendment takes effect:
·on the date the constitutional amendment takes effect, the provisional appraisal roll, as supplemented and corrected, becomes the appraisal roll for the taxing unit; and
·as soon as practicable after that date, the chief appraiser must correct the taxing unit's appraisal roll as necessary to finally account for the changes in law attributable to the constitutional amendment.
H.B. 9 requires the assessor for a taxing unit, on receipt of the appraisal roll for the 2025 tax year, to determine the total taxable value of property taxable by the taxing unit and the taxable value of new property as if the changes in law attributable to the applicable constitutional amendment proposed by the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, were in effect for that tax year. The bill requires an officer or employee designated by the governing body of a taxing unit to calculate the unit's no-new-revenue (NNR) tax rate and the voter-approval tax rate (VATR) to do so for the 2025 tax year as if the changes in law attributable to that constitutional amendment were in effect for that tax year.
H.B. 9 provides that, for the purposes of calculating the NNR tax rate, the VATR, and any related tax rate for the 2025 tax year, a taxing unit that calculates those rates under a provision of law other than Tax Code provisions relating to the submission of the appraisal roll to the governing body, to the calculation of the NNR tax rate and VATR, or to an automatic election to approve the adopted tax rate of a public school district, must calculate those rates as if the changes in law attributable to the applicable constitutional amendment proposed by the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, were in effect for that tax year.
H.B. 9 requires that, for purposes of state law providing for an automatic election to approve an adopted tax rate of a public school district that exceeds its VATR, a district's VATR for the 2025 tax year be calculated as if the changes in law attributable to the applicable constitutional amendment proposed by the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, were in effect for that tax year.
H.B. 9 requires the assessor for a taxing unit to calculate the amount of tax imposed by the unit on the tangible personal property a person owns that is held or used for the production of income for the 2025 tax year as if the changes in law attributable to the applicable constitutional amendment proposed by the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, were in effect for that tax year and also as if the changes in law attributable to that constitutional amendment were not in effect for that tax year. The bill also requires the assessor to correct the unit's tax roll for the 2025 tax year to reflect the results of the election to approve that constitutional amendment.
H.B. 9 provides the following with respect to taxes imposed by a taxing unit on the tangible personal property a person owns that is held or used for the production of income for the 2025 tax year, applicable only if the changes in law attributable to the applicable constitutional amendment proposed by the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, would lower the taxes imposed by the unit on the property for that tax year:
·the assessor for the taxing unit must compute the amount of taxes imposed and the other information required for the property's tax bill as if the changes in law attributable to the constitutional amendment were in effect for that tax year;
·the tax bill or the separate statement accompanying the tax bill must indicate that the tax bill is a provisional tax bill and include a statement, in substantially the same form as set out by the bill's provisions, indicating the following:
othe amount the tax bill would have been if the changes in law attributable to the constitutional amendment were not in effect for that tax year;
othe difference between the amount that the tax bill would have been if the changes in law attributable to the constitutional amendment were not in effect for that tax year and the amount that the tax bill is with those changes in effect;
othe amount of the tax bill as lowered by the changes in law attributable to the constitutional amendment and contingent on the approval by the voters at an election to be held November 4, 2025, of the constitutional amendment; and
othe amount of the supplemental tax bill that will be mailed if the constitutional amendment is not approved by the voters;
·the tax bill prepared by the assessor as provided by the bill's provisions and mailed as provided by applicable state law is considered to be a provisional tax bill until the canvass of the votes on the constitutional amendment and, if the constitutional amendment is approved by the voters, the tax bill is considered to be a final tax bill for the taxes imposed on the property for the 2025 tax year, and no additional tax bill is required to be mailed unless another provision of the Property Tax Code requires the mailing of a corrected tax bill; and
·if the constitutional amendment is not approved by the voters:
oa tax bill prepared by the assessor as provided by the bill's provisions is considered to be a final tax bill but only as to the portion of the taxes imposed on the property for the 2025 tax year that is included in the tax bill;
othe amount of taxes imposed by each taxing unit on the tangible personal property a person owns that is held or used for the production of income for the 2025 tax year is calculated as if the changes in law attributable to the constitutional amendment were not in effect for that tax year; and
othe assessor for each taxing unit must prepare and mail a supplemental tax bill, by December 1 or as soon thereafter as practicable, in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of the tax bill if the changes in law attributable to the constitutional amendment were not in effect for that tax year and the amount of the tax bill if those changes were in effect for that tax year.
The provisions of state law otherwise applicable to tax bills apply to such a supplemental tax bill, except as otherwise provided by the bill's provisions. The taxes for which such a supplemental tax bill is mailed are due on receipt of the tax bill and are delinquent if not paid before March 1 of the year following the year in which imposed.
The provisions of H.B. 9 that are not contingent on passage of the applicable constitutional amendment proposed by the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, expire December 31, 2026.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Except as otherwise provided, on passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2025.
Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB9 by Meyer (Relating to an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion of the appraised value of tangible personal property a person owns that is held or used for the production of income.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB9, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($566,354,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2026
($235,949,000)
2027
($330,405,000)
2028
($308,700,000)
2029
($409,142,000)
2030
($538,351,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Savings/(Cost) from Foundation School Fund 193
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from Recapture Payments Atten Crdts 8905
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from School Districts
2026
($235,949,000)
($91,728,000)
($378,153,000)
2027
($330,405,000)
($103,613,000)
($430,165,000)
2028
($308,700,000)
($96,440,000)
($422,671,000)
2029
($409,142,000)
($104,117,000)
($448,023,000)
2030
($538,351,000)
($99,639,000)
($496,667,000)
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend Chapter 11 of the Tax Code to exempt $250,000 of the appraised value of tangible personal property a person owns that is held for the production of income. This would replace the current exemption of less than $2,500 in taxable value.
Methodology
Contingent on the passage of a HJR 1, the bill would provide property owners with an exemption of $250,000 in tangible personal property that is held for the production of income, creating a fiscal impact to the state through the operation of the school finance formulas. This analysis is based on business personal property account value data provided to the Comptroller of Public Accounts by appraisal districts.
Under provisions of the Education Code, the school district tax revenue loss is partially transferred to the state. The estimated cost to the Foundation School Program (FSP) is $235.9 million in fiscal year 2026, $330.4 million in fiscal year 2027, increasing to $538.4 million in fiscal year 2030. The cost to the FSP includes estimated decreases in Recapture Payments - Attendance Credits of $91.7 million in fiscal year 2026, $103.6 million in fiscal year 2027, decreasing to $99.6 million in fiscal year 2030 as a result of school district tax revenue loss. The decrease in recapture is reflected as a revenue loss in the table above because recapture is appropriated as a method of finance for the FSP in the General Appropriations Act.
Note: Due to interactive effects, the estimated state cost of combining reducing school district taxable property value as proposed by this legislation with policies that would increase property tax rate compression would be lower than the combined state cost estimates of those policies in isolation.
Local Government Impact
Contingent upon passage of a constitutional amendment authorizing the property tax exemption, the bill would provide property owners with an exemption of $250,000 in tangible personal property that is held for the production of income which would reduce taxable value. However, the no-new-revenue and voter-approval tax rates as provided by Section 26.04, Tax Code would be higher as a consequence of the reduced taxable property value proposed by the bill. If cities, counties, and special districts did not adopt higher rates, local levies would be reduced by $452.0 million in fiscal year 2026. If those jurisdictionsadopted higher tax rates, the initial revenue loss from the exemption would be offset by increased tax levies from owners of non-exempt property and slightly reduced tax savings from owners of exempt property.
The fiscal impact to school districts is shown in the table above.
Source Agencies: b > td >
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, KK, SD, BRI
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB9 creates a conditional exemption from ad valorem taxation for Business Personal Property (BPP) valued under $125,000, effective January 1, 2026, contingent on voter approval. This legislation shifts the compliance burden from financial payment to strict asset reporting; businesses must now aggregate values across "Related Business Entities" at shared locations, with criminal penalties attached to incorrect certifications. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: January 1, 2026 (Contingent on passage of HJR 1 in the November 2025 election).
Q
Who authored HB9?
HB9 was authored by Texas Representative Morgan Meyer during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB9 signed into law?
HB9 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 12, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB9?
HB9 is enforced by County Appraisal Districts (Chief Appraisers), Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and County Tax Assessor-Collectors.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB9?
The compliance urgency for HB9 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB9?
The cost impact of HB9 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB9 address?
HB9 addresses topics including business & commerce, business & commerce--general, city government, city government--employees/officers and county government.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.