Relating to prohibiting organ transplant recipient discrimination on the basis of vaccination status.
CriticalImmediate action required
Low Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) • Texas Medical Board (implied oversight of physician determinations)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025
Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025. You must operate under the new non-discrimination standards immediately upon the effective date, regardless of pending agency guidance.
Agency Rulemaking: The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is required to adopt implementing rules by January 1, 2026.
*Warning:* This creates a four-month "Regulatory Gray Zone" (Sept 1 – Jan 1). You must comply with the statute's broad prohibitions before the agency defines specific enforcement parameters.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Update EHR Logic (By Aug 15, 2025): Remove vaccination status as an automatic disqualifier in patient intake software.
2.Draft Medical Determination Protocols (By Aug 1, 2025): Establish clinical SOPs for "individualized evaluations" and alternative risk mitigation (e.g., prophylactic testing) as required by Section 161.474(f).
3.Issue Provider Protection Memo (By Sept 1, 2025): Formally notify medical staff that they will not face retaliation for referring or treating unvaccinated transplant candidates.
4.Monitor HHSC Register: Assign compliance staff to watch for proposed rules in late 2025 to influence the definition of "medically significant."
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Medical Staff Bylaws & Employment Agreements: Review and amend provisions regarding adherence to hospital protocols. You must ensure no contractual clauses conflict with Section 161.474(d), which prohibits taking adverse action (firing, demoting, revoking privileges) against a provider who treats or refers an unvaccinated patient in compliance with this law.
Hiring/Training
Intake & Referral Staff: Train front-line staff immediately to stop screening patients out based on vaccination history.
Physician Training: Medical staff must be trained on the new burden of proof. They can no longer rely on general policy; they must perform an "individualized evaluation" to deny a transplant based on vaccination status.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
New Internal Form (Mandatory): Create a "Determination of Medical Significance" record. If a transplant is denied due to vaccination status, the physician must document that the lack of vaccination poses a "medically significant" risk to *that specific patient* for *that specific organ*.
Waitlist Audit: You must audit current waitlists prior to September 1, 2025. Re-evaluate any patient previously removed or deprioritized solely due to vaccination status to ensure they are processed under the new standards.
Fees & Costs
No New State Fees: The fiscal note indicates no new fees payable to the state.
Operational Costs: Budget for legal review of denial protocols and potential modifications to Electronic Health Record (EHR) workflows to remove automatic "hard stops" regarding vaccination status.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Medically Significant": The statute allows denial if the lack of vaccination is "medically significant," but does not define this term. Until HHSC defines this in 2026, this is your primary liability risk.
*Guidance:* Do not use this exception as a loophole for blanket policies. Ensure "significance" is tied to specific clinical evidence (e.g., active high-risk infection rates) rather than general preventative preference.
Scope of "Vaccination": The text implies all vaccinations (COVID-19, Influenza, Hepatitis, etc.). Do not assume this applies only to COVID-19.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Organ transplantation is a lifesaving medical procedure for individuals with end-stage organ failure. Eligibility for transplantation is determined based on various medical criteria to ensure the best possible outcomes for both recipients and donor organs. The bill author has informed the committee that there have been reports of patients being denied placement on transplant waiting lists, receiving lower priority, or being refused related medical services solely due to their vaccination choices. While transplant centers must consider various health risks to ensure patient safety, the bill author has informed the committee that the lack of clear protections in Texas law has led to concerns that individuals could be unfairly excluded from receiving transplants for nonmedically justified reasons.By establishing these protections, H.B. 4076 seeks to ensure that transplant eligibility decisions in Texas are fair, individualized, and based on legitimate medical considerations rather than nonmedical institutional policies such as vaccination status.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission in SECTION 2 of this bill.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 4076 amends the Health and Safety Code to prohibit a health care provider from doing the following solely on the basis of an individual's vaccination status:
·determining an individual is ineligible to receive an organ transplant;
·denying medical or other services related to an organ transplant, including evaluation, surgery, counseling, and postoperative treatment;
·refusing to refer the individual to a transplant center or other related specialist for evaluation or receipt of an organ transplant; or
·refusing to place the individual on an organ transplant waiting list or place the individual at a position lower in priority on the list than the position the individual would have been placed if not for the individual's vaccination status.
H.B. 4076 authorizes a health care provider to consider an individual's vaccination status when making a treatment recommendation or decision solely to the extent that a physician, following an individualized evaluation of the potential transplant recipient, determines the vaccination status is medically significant to the organ transplant. The bill's provisions do not require a referral or recommendation for, or the performance of, a medically inappropriate organ transplant and apply to each stage of the organ transplant process. The bill prohibits a person from taking an adverse action or imposing a penalty of any kind against a health care provider based solely on the fact that the health care provider complied with the bill's provisions.
H.B. 4076 establishes that a physician who in good faith makes a determination that an individual's vaccination status is medically significant to the organ transplant does not violate the bill's provisions. The bill authorizes a health care provider to:
·develop alternative risk mitigation strategies, including antibody testing, prophylactic treatments, and antiviral therapy, in lieu of requiring a vaccination; and
·inform patients of the risks and benefits of receiving a vaccination.
H.B. 4076 requires the executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission, not later than January 1, 2026, to adopt any rules necessary to implement the bill's provisions.
HB4076 prohibits health care providers and transplant centers from denying services, referrals, or waitlist placement solely based on a patient's vaccination status. Effective September 1, 2025, facilities must replace blanket vaccination mandates with individualized, medically documented risk assessments for every patient. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025.
Q
Who authored HB4076?
HB4076 was authored by Texas Representative Jeff Leach during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB4076 signed into law?
HB4076 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB4076?
HB4076 is enforced by Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) and Texas Medical Board (implied oversight of physician determinations).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB4076?
The compliance urgency for HB4076 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB4076?
The cost impact of HB4076 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB4076 address?
HB4076 addresses topics including health care providers, health, health--other diseases & medical conditions, discrimination and immunizations.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.