Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws concerning water and wastewater special districts, including a conforming amendment.
LowStandard timeline
Low Cost
Effective:2027-04-01
Enforcing Agencies
Willacy County Navigation District • Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA) • Upper Guadalupe River Authority (UGRA) • Franklin County Water District • Escondido Watershed District • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) • Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: April 1, 2027
Compliance Deadline: April 1, 2027. (All legal instruments executed after this date must reference the new Code chapters).
Agency Rulemaking: No state-level rulemaking is required to implement the codification. However, individual districts (GBRA, UGRA) must continue annual internal rulemaking regarding asset management and audits.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Audit Jurisdiction: Confirm if you have active operations or contracts with Willacy Navigation, GBRA, UGRA, Franklin Water, or Escondido Watershed districts.
2.Update Templates: Instruct outside counsel to prepare "2027 Compliant" contract templates referencing the new Special District Local Laws Code chapters.
3.Review Land Rights: If holding leases with Willacy County Navigation District, review Sec. 5008.0301 to ensure current lease terms align with codified duration limits.
4.Monitor GBRA Plans: Set a recurring calendar reminder to review the GBRA Annual Asset Management Plan for project forecasting.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Citation Overhaul: You must amend "Applicable Law" and "Authority" sections in long-term contracts. Replace references to "Acts of the [Year] Legislature" with the following new chapters:
Willacy County Navigation District: Chapter 5008
Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA): Chapter 8512
Upper Guadalupe River Authority (UGRA): Chapter 8515
Franklin County Water District: Chapter 9092
Escondido Watershed District: Chapter 9305
Bond Covenants: Financial officers and bond counsel must ensure all debt issued or refunded after April 1, 2027, cites the new statutory authority to ensure validity.
Hiring/Training
Director Onboarding: If your organization appoints members to the GBRA or UGRA boards, ensure they sign the required statement acknowledging receipt of the training manual (Sec. 8512.0210 / Sec. 8515.0211) *before* participating in any vote.
No General Staffing Changes: This bill does not impose new training requirements on general employees or contractors.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Business Development Monitoring (GBRA): Vendors should monitor the Annual Asset Management Plan (Sec. 8512.0404). This public document outlines the district's repair and replacement priorities, serving as a roadmap for upcoming procurement opportunities.
Complaint Tracking: If you file a formal complaint regarding rates or services with GBRA or UGRA, the districts are now statutorily mandated to maintain a complaint file and provide you with quarterly status updates until resolution.
Fees & Costs
No New Taxes/Fees: The bill is fiscal neutral.
Administrative Costs: Budget for legal counsel time to review and update contract templates prior to Q1 2027.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Nonsubstantive" Interpretation Risks: The Legislature intends for this to be a clean-up, not a policy change. However, "cleaning up" 1930s-era language can inadvertently alter the perceived scope of a district's power.
*Watch For:* If you are currently disputing a district's authority (e.g., water rights or eminent domain), compare the old text to the new Code immediately. If the new phrasing weakens your legal position, you must lobby for a technical correction before the 2027 effective date.
Eminent Domain Status: The bill codifies the expiration of eminent domain powers for certain districts unless specific filings were made by 2012. Verify the district's compliance with that historical deadline before conceding to any condemnation threats.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The Texas Legislative Council is required by Section 323.007, Government Code, to carry out a complete nonsubstantive revision of the Texas statutes. The process involves reclassifying and rearranging the statutes in a more logical order, employing a numbering system and format that will accommodate future expansion of the law, eliminating repealed, invalid, duplicative, and other ineffective provisions, and improving the draftsmanship of the law if practicableall toward promoting the stated purpose of making the statutes "more accessible, understandable, and usable" without altering the sense, meaning, or effect of the law.
The council has prepared a nonsubstantive revision of local laws governing certain special districts, including those concerning water and wastewater. Historically, the majority of local laws that governed individual special districts were published only in the volumes of legislative session laws. H.B. 1615 is the latest in a long-range project by the council to publish and revise local laws in the manner of the general laws, using the same numbering system employed in other codes. The project for the 89th Legislature revises laws governing the Willacy County Navigation District, the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, the Upper Guadalupe River Authority, the Franklin County Water District, and the Escondido Watershed District.
H.B. 1615 is a nonsubstantive revision of Texas law. The substance of the law has not been altered. The sole purpose of these provisions is to compile the relevant law, arrange it in a logical fashion, and rewrite it without altering its meaning or legal effect. If a particular source statute is ambiguous and the ambiguity cannot be resolved without a potential substantive effect, the ambiguity is preserved.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 1615 proposes new chapters of the Special District Local Laws Code as a nonsubstantive revision of local laws concerning certain special districts organized by type of district. The bill is organized into four articles, as follows:
·ARTICLE 1 revises local laws concerning the following special districts:
othe Willacy County Navigation District;
othe Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority;
othe Upper Guadalupe River Authority;
othe Franklin County Water District; and
othe Escondido Watershed District;
·ARTICLE 2 makes a conforming amendment to a certain local law relating to the territory comprising the Escondido Watershed District;
·ARTICLE 3 repeals the local laws revised in the proposed chapters and the portions of those local laws that have expired or that have been impliedly repealed; and
·ARTICLE 4 provides for the following general matters with respect to the bill's provisions:
othe bill is enacted under Section 43, Article III, Texas Constitution, and is intended as a codification only with no substantive change in the law;
othe bill does not increase or decrease the territory of any special districts as those boundaries exist on the bill's effective date;
othe repeal of a law by the bill, including a validating law, does not remove, void, or otherwise affect in any manner a validation made under the repealed law, and such a validation is preserved and continues to have the same effect that it would have if the law were not repealed; and
othe preservation and continuation of such a validation does not diminish the savings provisions prescribed by the Code Construction Act.
H.B. 1615 repeals the following provisions:
·Chapter 404, Acts of the 53rd Legislature, Regular Session, 1953;
·Chapter 135, Acts of the 54th Legislature, Regular Session, 1955;
·Chapter 141, Acts of the 55th Legislature, Regular Session, 1957;
·Chapter 392, Acts of the 56th Legislature, Regular Session, 1959;
·Sections 2 and 3, Chapter 449, Acts of the 56th Legislature, Regular Session, 1959;
·Sections 2 and 3, Chapter 654, Acts of the 60th Legislature, Regular Session, 1967;
·Sections 2 and 3, Chapter 892, Acts of the 81st Legislature, Regular Session, 2009;
·Chapter 75, Acts of the 43rd Legislature, 1st Called Session, 1933;
·Chapter 45, Acts of the 58th Legislature, Regular Session, 1963;
·Sections 2, 3, and 4, Chapter 432, Acts of the 61st Legislature, Regular Session, 1969;
·Sections 2 and 3, Chapter 433, Acts of the 64th Legislature, Regular Session, 1975;
·Sections 10, 12, and 13, Chapter 22, Acts of the 86th Legislature, Regular Session, 2019;
·Chapter 5, page 1062, Special Laws, Acts of the 46th Legislature, Regular Session, 1939;
·Sections 1 and 2, Chapter 193, Acts of the 59th Legislature, Regular Session, 1965;
·Section 2, Chapter 632, Acts of the 59th Legislature, Regular Session, 1965;
·Section 6, Article IV, Chapter 484, Acts of the 68th Legislature, Regular Session, 1983;
·Section 2, Chapter 1059, Acts of the 68th Legislature, Regular Session, 1983;
·Section 2, Chapter 830, Acts of the 75th Legislature, Regular Session, 1997;
·Sections 2 and 3, Chapter 1544, Acts of the 76th Legislature, Regular Session, 1999;
·Sections 6, 7, and 8, Chapter 180, Acts of the 88th Legislature, Regular Session, 2023;
·Chapter 719, Acts of the 59th Legislature, Regular Session, 1965;
·Chapter 308, Acts of the 60th Legislature, Regular Session, 1967;
·Section 3, Chapter 412, Acts of the 69th Legislature, Regular Session, 1985;
·Section 2, Chapter 59, Acts of the 72nd Legislature, Regular Session, 1991;
·Section 2, Chapter 3, Acts of the 75th Legislature, Regular Session, 1997; and
·Sections 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17, Chapter 364, Acts of the 57th Legislature, Regular Session, 1961.
Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB1615 by Leach (Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws concerning water and wastewater special districts, including a conforming amendment.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, KDw, CMA
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB1615 consolidates scattered historical statutes into the Texas Special District Local Laws Code for five specific water and navigation districts, effective in 2027. While legally "nonsubstantive," this requires a complete overhaul of legal citations in Master Service Agreements (MSAs), bond covenants, and land use contracts involving the Willacy County Navigation District, GBRA, UGRA, Franklin County Water District, and Escondido Watershed District. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: April 1, 2027 Compliance Deadline: April 1, 2027.
Q
Who authored HB1615?
HB1615 was authored by Texas Representative Jeff Leach during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB1615 signed into law?
HB1615 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 28, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB1615?
HB1615 is enforced by Willacy County Navigation District, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA), Upper Guadalupe River Authority (UGRA), Franklin County Water District, Escondido Watershed District, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB1615?
The compliance urgency for HB1615 is rated as "low". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB1615?
The cost impact of HB1615 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB1615 address?
HB1615 addresses topics including special districts & authorities, special districts & authorities--navigation & ports, special districts & authorities--river authorities, special districts & authorities--water & utility and special districts & authorities--water control improve dist..
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.