Relating to prohibiting certain activities by contractors and vendors of state agencies; providing administrative penalties.
CriticalImmediate action required
High Cost
Effective:2025-05-29
Enforcing Agencies
State Auditor's Office (Primary Oversight) • Texas Rangers Division of DPS (Criminal Investigations) • Texas Ethics Commission (Collaborative Oversight) • Comptroller of Public Accounts (Distribution of Debarment Lists)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date:May 29, 2025 (Law is currently active).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. All surveillance, data mining, and "undue influence" activities targeting state officials must cease instantly to avoid liability.
Agency Rulemaking: The State Auditor’s Office (SAO) is establishing a confidential reporting portal immediately. Expect aggressive enforcement and "example-making" prior to the first joint SAO/Texas Rangers report due September 1, 2026.
Immediate Action Plan
Issue a "Legal Hold" on all background research, private investigations, or data collection projects targeting state officials immediately.
Audit third-party contracts (investigators, data brokers) to ensure they are not scraping non-public data on state employees.
Distribute a compliance directive to Sales and Government Affairs leadership defining prohibited "undue influence" and "surveillance."
Update Subcontractor MSAs to shift the liability for debarment and fines to the offending party.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Mandatory Flow-Down: Immediately amend all Master Services Agreements (MSAs) to explicitly prohibit conduct defined in Sec. 2261.302.
Indemnification: Update indemnity clauses to cover administrative penalties ($500k–$2M) and lost revenue from debarment caused by subcontractor actions.
Termination Rights: Insert clauses allowing immediate contract termination if a subcontractor is investigated by the SAO or Texas Rangers.
Hiring/Training
Termination Hold: Implement a protocol requiring General Counsel review before disciplining any employee involved in state contracts. The law creates a rebuttable presumption of retaliation if an employee is terminated within 120 days of reporting a violation.
Sales & Lobbying Training: Train Government Affairs teams on the new definition of "undue influence." Strict firewalls must be established between sensitive data repositories and sales teams.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Data Source Audits: You must document the source of all business intelligence data regarding state officials to prove it was "publicly available" and not illicitly mined.
Internal Whistleblowing: Establish an internal reporting channel distinct from the state's hotline to capture complaints before they escalate to the SAO.
Fees & Costs
Uninsurable Risk: There are no new state fees, but the financial risk is severe. Review General Liability policies; most exclude administrative penalties. Review Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) for coverage of "exemplary damages" in retaliation suits.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Data Mining": The statute prohibits collecting data without authorization unless "publicly available," but fails to clarify if aggregating public social media data (scraping) constitutes prohibited mining. Adopt a conservative stance until SAO rulemaking occurs.
"Undue Influence": The law defines this as "improper use of... information." This blurs the line between aggressive sales and illegality. Using confidential knowledge of an agency's internal struggles to pitch a solution could be interpreted as a violation.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The bill author has informed the committee that the CEO of Superior HealthPlan, a state Medicaid insurance company, recently admitted to hiring private investigators to conduct surveillance on lawmakers, their families, patients, and journalists, which included attempts to access sensitive information such as sealed divorce records and investigating spouses and family members. The bill author has also informed the committee that actions like these taken by state contractors erode public trust, highlight vulnerabilities in current oversight mechanisms, and raise concerns about potential coercion used to secure state contracts, interference with accountability and oversight, and the undermining of legitimate claims. H.B. 5061 seeks to prevent such breaches of trust, safeguard and protect the interests of Texas citizens, improve accountability, deter unethical behavior, and promote fairness in state contracting by prohibiting certain activities by contractors and vendors of state agencies.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 5061 amends the Government Code to prohibit certain activities by contractors and vendors of state agencies and to provide for administrative penalties.
Applicability
H.B. 5061 applies to each procurement of goods or services made by a state agency, including a procurement made as follows:
·by the comptroller of public accounts;
·under purchasing authority delegated to the agency by or under statutory provisions relating to the following:
othe acquisition of goods and services by a public institution of higher education;
othe acquisition of goods and services by The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center;
othe delegation of purchasing functions by the comptroller; or
oapplicable purchases of less than a specified monetary amount or purchases over that amount as authority is delegated by the comptroller; or
·by the Texas Department of Transportation or a procurement paid for by local or institutional funds of an institution of higher education.
Prohibited Activities
H.B. 5061 prohibits a contractor or subcontractor of a state agency or a vendor responding to a contract solicitation from directly or indirectly doing the following through a third party:
·engaging in surveillance targeting the following individuals:
oa member of the state legislature or a person employed to support the state legislature in any capacity;
oa state agency employee, including an independent contractor who contracts with a state agency to perform work or provide a service; or
oan individual making a complaint or raising concerns regarding state agency operations or contracting;
·engaging in an act of intimidation, coercion, extortion, undue influence, or other similar conduct intended to influence, silence, or retaliate against such an individual; or
·using private or confidential information to manipulate or influence a state contracting decision or proceeding.
For purposes of the bill's provisions, the bill defines "surveillance" as monitoring, investigating, tracking, or collecting information about an individual without the individual's express authorization, including physical surveillance, electronic tracking, data mining, and social media monitoring, and "undue influence" as an improper use of power, position, or information to manipulate a decision-making process, including the use of private or confidential information for personal or organizational gain.
Oversight, Enforcement, Complaint Process, and Investigation
H.B. 5061 requires the state auditor's office (SAO) to oversee and enforce the bill's provisions and authorizes the SAO to collaborate with the Texas Ethics Commission to ensure compliance with the bill's provisions and transparency of oversight and enforcement actions. The bill requires the Texas Rangers division of the Department of Public Safety (DPS) to investigate any alleged criminal offense related to a violation of the bill's provisions.
H.B. 5061 authorizes a person who believes that the person was the target of prohibited activity under the bill's provisions to file a complaint with the SAO. The bill requires the SAO to do the following with respect to such a complaint:
·establish and maintain a confidential reporting hotline and an online portal for submitting a complaint;
·investigate a complaint submitted under these provisions and determine whether a violation of the bill's provisions occurred not later than the 90th day after the date the office receives the complaint; and
·if during an investigation of a complaint the SAO suspects that a criminal offense has been committed, refer the matter to the Texas Rangers division of DPS for a comprehensive criminal investigation.
The bill requires the Texas Rangers division of DPS to investigate the complaint and, if appropriate, refer the matter to the attorney general's office for prosecution.
Contract Termination, Barring From State Contracts, and Administrative Penalties
H.B. 5061 establishes that, on a final determination by the SAO that a person violated the bill's provisions, the person is, as follows:
·for a first violation:
osubject to immediate termination of any state contracts without further obligation;
oliable for an administrative penalty in an amount not to exceed $500,000 or, if the violation involved undue influence or the misuse of private or confidential information, $2 million; and
obarred from responding to a solicitation for or being awarded a state contract until the 10th anniversary of the date the person receives the final determination or, if the violation involved undue influence or the misuse of private or confidential information, until the 15th anniversary of that date; and
·for a second or subsequent violation:
osubject to immediate termination of all state contracts without further obligation;
oliable for an administrative penalty in an amount not to exceed $1 million or, if the violation involved undue influence or the misuse of private or confidential information, $2 million; and
obarred permanently from responding to a solicitation for or being awarded a state contract.
The bill establishes that an individual who authorizes or directs an entity to violate the bill's provisions may be subject to a penalty under these provisions in the same manner as an entity that is determined to have violated the bill's provisions.
Prohibited Retaliation Against Employees
H.B. 5061 establishes that an employee has a cause of action against an employer who suspends or terminates the employee's employment or otherwise disciplines or discriminates or retaliates against the employee for the following:
·reporting to the employee's supervisor, a state regulatory agency, or a law enforcement agency a violation of the bill's provisions; or
·initiating or cooperating in any investigation by or proceeding of a governmental entity relating to a state contract.
The bill defines "employee" for these purposes as a person who is an employee of a contractor or subcontractor of a state agency or a vendor responding to a contract solicitation by a state agency.
H.B. 5061 authorizes a petitioner to recover the following:
·actual damages and damages for lost wages if the petitioner's employment was suspended or terminated;
·exemplary damages;
·court costs; and
·reasonable attorney's fees.
The bill entitles a person whose employment is suspended or terminated, in addition to those amounts, to appropriate injunctive relief, including, if applicable, reinstatement in the person's former position and reinstatement of lost fringe benefits or seniority rights.
H.B. 5061 requires the petitioner, not later than the 90th day after the date on which the person's employment is suspended or terminated, to bring suit or notify the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) of the petitioner's intent to sue under the bill's provisions. A petitioner who notifies TWC under these provisions must bring suit not later than the 90th day after the date of the delivery of the notice to TWC. The bill requires TWC, on receipt of the notice, to notify the employer of the petitioner's intent to bring suit.
H.B. 5061 establishes that the petitioner has the burden of proof, except that there is a rebuttable presumption that the person's employment was suspended or terminated for reporting abuse, neglect, or exploitation if the person is suspended or terminated within 60 days after the date the person reported the violation or initiated or cooperated in an investigation or proceeding. A suit under the bill's provisions may be brought in the district court of the county in which the plaintiff resides, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant, or the defendant conducts business. The bill requires the SAO to provide legal assistance to a petitioner who brings suit.
Annual Report
H.B. 5061 requires the SAO and the Texas Rangers division of DPS jointly to submit to the governor, the lieutenant governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, and each member of the legislature, not later than September 1 of each year, a written report on the following:
·the number and nature of complaints filed alleging a violation of the bill's provisions;
·the outcome of each complaint investigated by the SAO and, if applicable, the Texas Rangers division of DPS; and
·the penalties imposed under the bill's provisions.
The bill requires the SAO and the Texas Rangers division of DPS jointly to submit the first required report not later than September 1, 2026.
Honorable Giovanni Capriglione, Chair, House Committee on Delivery of Government Efficiency
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB5061 by Leach (Relating to prohibiting certain activities by contractors and vendors of state agencies; providing administrative penalties.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources. The amount of revenue that could be collected from the civil penalties cannot be determined, but is not expected to be significant.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 308 State Auditor's Office, 320 Texas Workforce Commission, 356 Texas Ethics Commission, 405 Department of Public Safety, 601 Department of Transportation, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 720 The University of Texas System Administration
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, RStu, CMA, BC
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
Effective May 29, 2025, HB5061 fundamentally alters the risk landscape for all state contractors by criminalizing specific surveillance and lobbying tactics. The law pierces the corporate veil, meaning a violation by a subcontractor or affiliate can result in a $2 million fine and 15-year to permanent debarment for the parent company. This is an immediate operational threat requiring a total audit of government relations and business intelligence practices.
Q
Who authored HB5061?
HB5061 was authored by Texas Representative Jeff Leach during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB5061 signed into law?
HB5061 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 29, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB5061?
HB5061 is enforced by State Auditor's Office (Primary Oversight), Texas Rangers Division of DPS (Criminal Investigations), Texas Ethics Commission (Collaborative Oversight) and Comptroller of Public Accounts (Distribution of Debarment Lists).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB5061?
The compliance urgency for HB5061 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB5061?
The cost impact of HB5061 is estimated as "high". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB5061 address?
HB5061 addresses topics including purchasing, purchasing--state, crimes, crimes--against persons and crimes--against persons--general.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.