Relating to the rights of victims of sexual assault and other sex offenses, the offense of continuous sexual abuse, and the prosecution, punishment, and collateral consequences of certain sex offenses; creating a criminal offense; increasing criminal penalties; changing the eligibility for community supervision, mandatory supervision, and parole for persons convicted of certain sex offenses.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Department of Public Safety (DPS) • Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) • Pardons and Paroles Division • Local Law Enforcement and Prosecutors
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Compliance Deadline:December 1, 2025 (Healthcare providers must operationalize "Limited Consent" forms and evidence routing).
Agency Rulemaking: The Department of Public Safety (DPS) must adopt the standardized "Limited Consent for DNA Testing" form by December 1, 2025. Do not create internal forms; you must wait for the DPS-promulgated document.
Immediate Action Plan
1.HR/Legal: Update hiring adjudication matrices to include the new "Continuous Sexual Abuse" felony and upgraded "Voyeurism" classifications immediately.
2.Higher Ed Facilities: Conduct a physical security audit of all restrooms and locker rooms. Repair broken latches and gaps to mitigate "State Jail Felony" negligence claims.
3.Healthcare Compliance: Draft a "Limited Consent" policy shell now, but calendar a review for November 2025 to insert the specific DPS form once released.
4.General Counsel: Issue a memo to medical staff regarding the conflict between HB1422 and Mandatory Reporting laws for minors, establishing a clear protocol for frontline workers.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Background Screening Vendors: Review Master Service Agreements (MSAs) immediately. Vendors must update adjudication grids to flag "Continuous Sexual Abuse" (Penal Code Sec. 21.03) as a First Degree Felony and "Voyeurism" (Penal Code Sec. 21.17) as a Class A Misdemeanor (or State Jail Felony if on campus).
Forensic Couriers: Healthcare facilities must amend scopes of work to ensure couriers are authorized to transport "Limited Consent" kits directly to DPS laboratories, bypassing local law enforcement intake.
Hiring/Training
Healthcare Intake Staff: SANE nurses and ER admission staff require training on the "Limited Consent" workflow. They must be able to explain to patients that they can receive DNA testing *without* a police report.
Campus Security: Higher education security teams must increase patrol frequency in "high-privacy" zones (restrooms, locker rooms, dorms). The shift of voyeurism to a felony increases the institution's negligence exposure if these areas are unmonitored.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Limited Consent Form: Effective December 1, 2025, you must integrate the DPS-mandated form into your Electronic Health Records (EHR). This form must explicitly state that reporting to law enforcement is *not* required for testing.
Result Notification: Healthcare providers must utilize the statewide electronic tracking system to notify survivors of DNA results directly, as law enforcement will not serve as the intermediary for these specific cases.
Fees & Costs
Parole Supervision Fee: A new $5.00/month fee applies to parolees under these offense categories (effective June 20, 2025).
Operational Costs: Healthcare systems should budget for EHR software updates to accommodate the new consent forms and tracking integration.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
Mandatory Reporting vs. Limited Consent: The law allows victims to request testing without a police report. However, Texas Family Code Chapter 261 mandates reporting abuse of minors. The statute does not explicitly resolve this conflict. Until the Attorney General issues an opinion, legal counsel should assume mandatory reporting for minors supersedes HB1422's non-reporting provisions.
Federal CODIS Compliance: The Fiscal Note warns that testing DNA without a crime report may violate FBI standards, potentially excluding these samples from the national CODIS database. Providers must monitor DPS rulemaking to see if a separate, state-only database is created, as this materially affects what you tell a survivor regarding the utility of the test.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The bill author has informed the committee that, currently, survivors of sexual assault must first file a report with law enforcement before the evidence collection kit is tested for foreign DNA material. The bill author has further informed the committee that the punishment and offenses for certain sexual offenses are not in line with similar offenses; for example, the offense of voyeurism is a Class C misdemeanor but the offense of invasive visual recording is a state jail felony despite the conduct for the offenses being similar. In addition, while a court may order sentences to run consecutively for offenders convicted of multiple charges of sexual assault or aggravated sexual assault of a victim under 17 years of age, courts do not have this discretion with respect to an offender convicted of multiple charges of sexual assault or aggravated sexual assault of an adult. Similarly, while there is an offense for continuous sexual abuse of a young child or disabled individual, there is no offense for continuous sexual abuse of an adult. C.S.H.B. 1422 seeks to address these issues by authorizing survivors of sexual assault to provide limited consent for the Department of Public Safety to test evidence in an evidence collection kit without having to report the offense to law enforcement, by increasing and enhancing penalties for other sex offenses, by providing for consecutive sentences for a person convicted of multiple charges of sexual assault regardless of the age of the survivor, and by creating the offense of continuous sexual abuse applicable to a survivor who is an adult.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Department of Public Safety in SECTION 6 of this bill.
ANALYSIS
Rights of Survivors of Sexual Assault and Other Sex Offenses; Forensic DNA Testing of Certain Evidence
C.S.H.B. 1422 amends the Government Code to authorize a survivor or other person authorized to consent to the release of evidence contained in an evidence collection kit, for purposes of encouraging the reporting of sexual assaults or other sex offenses that would otherwise remain unreported, to choose to limit the scope of their consent to only permit, without regard to whether a report of the offense is made to a law enforcement agency, the performance of forensic DNA testing by the Department of Public Safety (DPS) on biological evidence contained in the evidence collection kit. Accordingly, the bill specifies that the reason or purpose required for the release of evidence by the survivor or other person under state law may be limited to permit only such acts by DPS, regardless of whether a report of the applicable offense is made to a law enforcement agency.
C.S.H.B. 1422 requires DPS by rule to adopt a form, not later than December 1, 2025, to enable a survivor or other authorized person to provide the limited consent. The bill prescribes the statement, including language specifying that any results of the forensic DNA testing will not be compared to DNA profiles maintained in DNA databases and will not be subject to use in a criminal investigation or trial, that must be included on the form and, in addition, requires DPS to do the following:
·provide to the survivor or other authorized person who provides limited consent to forensic DNA testing, the results of the forensic DNA testing through the statewide electronic tracking system established under the Sexual Assault Prevention and Crisis Services Act;
·obtain additional written consent from the person under that act before notifying any other entity of the results of the forensic DNA testing or before using those results for any other reason or purpose; and
·provide to the survivor or other authorized person who provides limited consent to forensic DNA testing, information regarding how to report an offense to a law enforcement agency in order to have the results of the forensic DNA testing compared to DNA profiles maintained in DNA databases and used in a criminal investigation or trial.
C.S.H.B. 1422 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to revise the requirement for DPS to develop procedures for the transfer and preservation of evidence collected during a forensic medical examination for a sexual assault that was not reported to a law enforcement agency as follows:
·includes a requirement for DPS to develop procedures for the testing of such evidence; and
·includes among the procedures that DPS must develop procedures for forensic DNA testing performed in accordance with the limited consent of a survivor or other authorized person under the bill's provisions.
Continuous Sexual Abuse
Offense; Penalties
C.S.H.B. 1422 amends the Penal Code to create the first degree felony offense of continuous sexual abuse for a person who does the following:
·during a period that is 30 or more days in duration, commits two or more acts of sexual abuse against two or more victims; and
·at the time of the commission of each of the acts of sexual abuse, is 17 years of age or older.
The term "act of sexual abuse" used for the offense of continuous sexual abuse created by the bill has the same definition used under current law for purposes of the offense of continuous sexual abuse of a young child or disabled individual.
Prosecution; Defenses
C.S.H.B. 1422, for purposes of a trial for an offense of continuous sexual abuse in which the jury is the trier of fact, provides the following:
·the jury must agree unanimously that the defendant, during a period that is 30 or more days in duration, committed two or more acts of sexual abuse against two or more victims; but
·members of the jury are not required to agree unanimously on which specific acts of sexual abuse were committed by the defendant or the exact date when those acts were committed.
C.S.H.B. 1422 prohibits a defendant from being charged with more than one count under such an offense if all of the specific acts of sexual abuse that are alleged to have been committed are alleged to have been committed against only two victims. For purposes of the conviction of a defendant in the same criminal action for an act of sexual abuse that constitutes a separate offense and also continuous sexual abuse in which the victim is the same, the separate offense must meet one of the following conditions:
·the offense is charged in the alternative;
·the offense occurred outside the period in which the continuous sexual abuse offense was committed; or
·the offense is considered by the trier of fact to be a lesser offense than continuous sexual abuse.
C.S.H.B. 1422 establishes as an affirmative defense to prosecution for continuous sexual abuse involving only two or more victims younger than 17 years of age that the actor met the following conditions:
·was not more than five years older than the youngest victim of the offense;
·did not use duress, force, or a threat against a victim at the time of the commission of any of the acts of sexual abuse alleged as an element of the offense; and
·at the time of the commission of any of the acts of sexual abuse alleged as an element of the offense, was not required to register for life as a sex offender or was not otherwise required to register as a sex offender.
Ineligibility for Certain Community Supervision, Release on Parole, or Mandatory Supervision
C.S.H.B. 1422 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure and Government Code to include the offense of continuous sexual abuse among the offenses ineligible for the following:
·deferred adjudication community supervision;
·release on parole or intensive supervision parole; or
·release to mandatory supervision.
Accordingly, the bill conditions the authority for a parole panel, for the purpose of diverting inmates to halfway houses, to designate a presumptive parole date for an inmate after reviewing all available pertinent information on the inmate having never been convicted of the offense of continuous sexual abuse. The bill requires a parole panel, as a condition of parole or mandatory supervision, to require that a releasee convicted of such an offense pay a parole supervision fee of $5 each month during the period of parole supervision to the pardons and paroles division.
C.S.H.B. 1422 includes a first degree burglary offense committed with the intent to commit continuous sexual abuse among the offenses ineligible for judge-ordered community supervision.
Sex Offender Registration
C.S.H.B. 1422 includes the offense of continuous sexual abuse among the offenses for which a reportable conviction or adjudication subjects an offender to registration under the sex offender registration program and the commission of which requires an offender 17 years of age or older to register for life under the program.
Enhanced Penalties for Previous Conviction
C.S.H.B. 1422 amends the Penal Code to include a previous conviction for the offense of continuous sexual abuse among the previous convictions for which the following penalty enhancements apply to an individual or defendant:
·the penalty enhancement to a third degree felony for an individual adjudged guilty of a state jail felony;
·the penalty enhancement to imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) for life for a defendant who is convicted of certain sexual offenses or offenses committed with sexual intent punishable as a second degree or first degree felony; and
·the penalty enhancement to a second degree felony for an individual who is convicted of child grooming.
Penalties and Punishments for Sexual Assault and Other Sex Offenses
Sexual Assault and Aggravated Sexual Assault
Under current law, a person who is found guilty of more than one violation of the following offenses arising out of the same criminal episode or an offense for which a plea agreement was reached in a case in which the person was charged with more than one such violation may be sentenced to serve consecutively if the violations are against a victim who was younger than 17 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense, regardless of whether the violations are for the same offense:
·sexual assault;
·aggravated sexual assault;
·online solicitation of a minor;
·continuous sexual abuse of a young child or disabled individual;
·indecency with a child;
·prohibited sexual conduct; or
·sexual performance by a child.
The bill removes sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault from the list of offenses in that provision and creates a new provision under which a person may be sentenced to serve consecutively under the same circumstances except the new provision applies to violations of sexual assault or aggravated sexual assault against any victim rather than only victims younger than 17 years of age as under current law.
C.S.H.B. 1422 extends the applicability of the 25-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment in TDCJ for aggravated sexual assault from an actor who commits the offense against a victim younger than six years of age to an actor who commits the offense against a victim younger than 11 years of age.
Criminal Solicitation of a Minor
C.S.H.B. 1422 expands the conditions under which the offense of criminal solicitation of a minor applies to include an actor's commission of the requisite conduct with the intent to commit continuous sexual abuse.
Voyeurism
C.S.H.B. 1422 increases the penalty for voyeurism from a Class C misdemeanor to a Class A misdemeanor. For purposes of the existing Class B misdemeanor penalty enhancement for voyeurism, the bill does the following:
·replaces the condition that the actor has been previously convicted at least twice with the condition that the actor has been previously convicted at least once or that the victim was a child younger than 18 years of age at the time of the offense; and
·increases the penalty from a Class B misdemeanor to a state jail felony.
The bill removes the penalty enhancements to the next higher category for voyeurism on the premises of a postsecondary educational institution but makes voyeurism on such premises punishable as a state jail felony. Moreover, for purposes of the existing state jail felony enhancement for voyeurism, the bill does the following:
·replaces the condition that the victim was younger than 14 years old at the time of the offense with the condition that the victim was younger than 18 years old at the time of that offense and that the actor has previously been convicted of voyeurism involving a victim who was a child younger than 18 years of age at the time of the offense; and
·increases the penalty from a state jail felony to a third degree felony.
Sexual Coercion
C.S.H.B. 1422 expands the conduct constituting the offense of sexual coercion to include intentionally threatening, including by coercion or extortion, to commit continuous sexual abuse to obtain, in return for not committing that conduct, or in connection with the conduct, certain benefits.
Applicability
The provisions of C.S.H.B. 1422 relating to limited consent for forensic DNA testing of certain evidence and DPS procedures for testing evidence apply only to biological evidence collected on or after December 1, 2025. Biological evidence collected before that date is governed by the law in effect on the date the evidence was collected, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.
C.S.H.B. 1422 applies only to an offense committed on or after the bill's effective date. An offense committed before the bill's effective date is governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For these purposes, an offense was committed before the bill's effective date if any element of the offense occurred before that date.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1422 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
While the introduced and substitute both authorize a survivor or other person to choose to limit the scope of consent to the release of evidence contained in an evidence collection kit for certain purposes, the versions differ as follows: the introduced included among those purposes the comparison of a DNA profile obtained from the biological evidence with DNA profiles maintained in state databases and the CODIS DNA database established by the FBI, if the amount and quality of the analyzed sample meet the requirements of the state database or FBI's CODIS comparison policies, whereas the substitute does not.
Accordingly, the substitute does not include the introduced version's requirement for DPS to provide notice to the survivor or other person regarding whether any matches are identified between the DNA profile submitted to DPS and DNA profiles contained in applicable DNA databases or the prohibition against notifying any other entity of the results of the comparison of DNA profiles. The substitute includes requirements absent from the introduced for DPS instead to do the following:
·provide to the survivor or other person the results of the forensic DNA testing through the statewide electronic tracking system established under the Sexual Prevention and Crisis Services Act; and
·provide to the survivor or other person information regarding how to report an offense to a law enforcement agency in order to have the results of the forensic DNA testing compared to DNA profiles maintained in DNA databases and used in a criminal investigation or trial.
With respect to the prescribed statement contained in the form that DPS must adopt, the substitute replaces language specifying that any results of the DNA testing and comparison may be subject to use in a criminal investigation or trial, regardless of whether the person chooses to file a report in their case, as in the introduced, with language specifying that any results of the forensic DNA testing will not be compared to DNA profiles maintained in DNA databases and will not be subject to use in a criminal investigation or trial.
The substitute revises the requirement for DPS to develop procedures for the transfer and preservation of evidence collected during a forensic medical examination for a sexual assault that was not reported to a law enforcement agency, whereas the introduced did not.
With respect to the offense of continuous sexual abuse created by the bill, the substitute makes the following revisions to the conduct constituting the offense:
·lowers the minimum number of acts of sexual abuse from three or more, as in the introduced, to two or more;
·raises the minimum number of victims from one or more, as in the introduced, to two or more; and
·does not include the condition that the victim is either:
oa child younger than 14 years of age, regardless of whether the person knows the age of the victim at the time of the offense, or a disabled individual; or
oany other person regardless of age or disability, other than a victim who is 14 years of age or older, younger than 17 years of age, and not more than three years younger than the actor.
Accordingly, the substitute changes the minimum number of acts of sexual abuse and victims that a jury, if it is the trier of fact in the trial of such an offense, must agree unanimously that the defendant committed from three or more acts of sexual abuse, as in the introduced, to two or more acts of sexual abuse against two or more victims. The substitute also makes the following changes with respect to the offense of continuous sexual abuse:
·for purposes of the application of the prohibition against a defendant being charged with more than one count of the offense for all acts of sexual abuse that are alleged to have been committed against a victim, changes the number of victims from a single victim, as in the introduced, to only two victims; and
·for purposes of the application of the affirmative defense to prosecution for the offense of continuous sexual abuse involving a victim younger than 17 years of age, raises the minimum number of victims from one or more, as in the introduced, to two or more.
Whereas the introduced made the offense of continuous sexual abuse a first degree felony punishable by imprisonment in TDCJ for life or for any term of not more than 99 years or less than 25 years, the substitute makes the offense a first degree felony.
The substitute does not include the provision of the introduced establishing that if conduct constituting the offense of continuous sexual abuse also constitutes continuous sexual abuse of a young child or disabled individual, the actor may be prosecuted under either offense, but not both.
The substitute does the following, none of which the introduced did:
·includes the offense of continuous sexual abuse among the offenses ineligible for:
odeferred adjudication community supervision;
orelease on parole or intensive supervision parole; and
orelease to mandatory supervision;
·conditions the authority for a parole panel to designate a presumptive parole date for an inmate after reviewing all available pertinent information on the inmate having never been convicted of the offense of continuous sexual abuse;
·requires a parole panel, as a condition of parole or mandatory supervision, to require that a releasee convicted of continuous sexual abuse pay a parole supervision fee of $5 each month during the period of parole supervision to the pardons and paroles division;
·includes a first degree burglary offense committed with the intent to commit continuous sexual abuse among the offenses ineligible for judge-ordered community supervision;
·includes the offense of continuous sexual abuse among the offenses for which a reportable conviction or adjudication subjects an offender to required sex offender registration and the commission of which by a person 17 years of age or older subjects that person to register for life as a sex offender; and
·includes a previous conviction for the offense of continuous sexual abuse among the previous convictions for which certain penalty enhancements apply to the following:
oan individual adjudged guilty of a state jail felony;
oa defendant convicted of certain sexual offenses or offenses committed with sexual intent punishable as a second degree or first degree felony; and
oan individual convicted of child grooming.
Whereas the introduced made the 25-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment applicable to an actor who commits aggravated sexual assault against any victim younger than 14 years of age at the time of the offense, regardless of the manner in which the offense is committed, the substitute extends applicability of the mandatory minimum from an actor who commits the offense against a victim younger than six years of age to an actor who commits the offense against a victim younger than 11 years of age.
The substitute does the following, whereas the introduced did not:
·expands the conditions under which the offense of criminal solicitation of a minor applies to include an actor's commission of the requisite conduct with the intent to commit continuous sexual abuse; and
·expands the conduct constituting the offense of sexual coercion to include intentionally threatening, including by coercion or extortion, to commit continuous sexual abuse to obtain, in return for not committing that conduct, or in connection with the conduct, certain benefits.
The substitute includes a procedural provision absent from the introduced relating to the application of the bill's provisions relating to limited consent for forensic DNA testing of certain evidence and DPS procedures for testing evidence to biological evidence collected on or after December 1, 2025.
Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB1422 by Hull (Relating to the rights of victims of sexual assault and other sex offenses, the offense of continuous sexual abuse, and the prosecution and punishment of certain sex offenses; creating a criminal offense; increasing criminal penalties.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1422, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($2,316,915) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Relaxing criteria for multiple prosecution and exceptional sentencing, creating a new criminal offense, and expanding the conduct constituting and increasing the penalty for an existing offense may result in additional demands upon state and local correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or sentenced to a term of confinement. The fiscal implications of the bill relating to criminal offenses cannot be determined due to a lack of data to identify cases that meet the bill's criteria for specific sentencing options, penalties, or penalty enhancements.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2026
($1,312,281)
2027
($1,004,634)
2028
($1,004,634)
2029
($1,004,634)
2030
($1,004,634)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from Federal Funds 555
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2025
2026
($1,312,281)
($3,378,789)
7.0
2027
($1,004,634)
($3,378,789)
7.0
2028
($1,004,634)
($3,378,789)
7.0
2029
($1,004,634)
($3,378,789)
7.0
2030
($1,004,634)
($3,378,789)
7.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would provide for the testing and comparison of DNA evidence without regard to whether a report of the offense is made to a law enforcement agency. Under current procedures, the Department of Public Safety (DPS) cannot submit DNA samples for comparison to the federal CODIS DNA database unless a report of the offense has been made to a law enforcement agency; making such a submission would violate agreements with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and put the agency at risk of a loss of federal funding.
The bill would require DPS to process and store an additional number of sexual assault kits, necessitating additional agency staff.
The bill would require DPS to upgrade certain tracking software to comply with the bill's victim consent and additional evidence submission provisions.
The bill would allow for multiple prosecutions with options for concurrent or consecutive sentencing for the offenses of sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault in certain cases where the victim is younger than 17 years of age and a plea agreement is reached.
The bill would relax criteria for a 25 year minimum term of imprisonment for the offense of aggravated sexual assault by excluding certain offense circumstances and raising the minimum victim age to 14 years.
The bill would relax previous conviction criteria for the exceptional sentencing of the offense of aggravated sexual assault as a capital felony.
The bill would create the first degree felony offense of continuous sexual abuse, committed when, during a period that is 30 or more days in duration, an actor 17 years of age or older commits three or more acts of sexual abuse, as defined in the bill, and the victim meets certain age requirements. The offense would be punishable with a minimum 25 year term of imprisonment.
The bill would amend conduct constituting and increase penalties for the offense of voyeurism. Under existing statute, the offense is punishable along a penalty range from a Class C misdemeanor to a state jail felony; the bill would provide for a penalty range from a Class A misdemeanor to a third degree felony. The bill would expand existing penalty enhancement criteria for the offense to include victims up to 18 years of age.
Methodology
According to the Department of Public Safety (DPS), the duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could not be absorbed within existing resources. DPS states that 6.0 additional Forensic Scientist III would be needed to test an estimated 1,300 non-reported sexual assault test kits, with each forensic scientist completing an average of 18 DNA cases per month. Additionally, DPS also estimates the agency would need 1.0 Program Specialist V to support increased full-time equivalent positions.
This analysis includes $679,375 in fiscal year 2026 and $679,375 in fiscal year 2027 for salary and benefits. Other costs including rent, consumable supplies, travel, other operating expenses, and capital expenditures would total $632,906 in fiscal year 2026 and $325,259 in fiscal year 2027.
DPS also estimates a potential loss of $3,378,789 per fiscal year in federal funds related to the DNA Capacity Enhancement for Backlog Reduction Program due to CODIS non-compliance.
Technology
DPS estimates $225,000 in fiscal year 2026 for software upgrades to the Laboratory Information Management System to track cases under the provisions of the bill.
Local Government Impact
While the fiscal impact cannot be determined, relaxing criteria for multiple prosecution and exceptional sentencing, creating a new criminal offense, and expanding the conduct constituting and increasing the penalty for an existing offensemay result in increased demands upon local correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or confined locally.
Source Agencies: b > td >
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, MGol, AMr, DGI, KVEL
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB1422 fundamentally bifurcates forensic evidence workflows for healthcare providers, requiring a new "Limited Consent" track for DNA testing without police reporting by December 1, 2025. Simultaneously, the law significantly expands premises liability for higher education institutions by reclassifying on-campus voyeurism as a State Jail Felony, necessitating immediate upgrades to security protocols in private areas. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Criminal penalties and sentencing enhancements apply immediately).
Q
Who authored HB1422?
HB1422 was authored by Texas Representative Lacey Hull during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB1422 signed into law?
HB1422 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB1422?
HB1422 is enforced by Department of Public Safety (DPS), Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), Pardons and Paroles Division and Local Law Enforcement and Prosecutors.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB1422?
The compliance urgency for HB1422 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB1422?
The cost impact of HB1422 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB1422 address?
HB1422 addresses topics including crimes, crimes--against persons, crimes--against persons--sexual, criminal procedure and criminal procedure--sentencing & punishment.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.