Relating to general definitions for and collection of governmental information regarding biological sex.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Department of Public Safety (DPS) • Department of State Health Services (DSHS) • All Texas Governmental Entities (State, County, Municipal)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025
Compliance Deadline:September 1, 2025 (State systems, including TxEVER and Crime Records, are expected to reject non-compliant data on this date. Private entities must test and deploy system updates *before* this deadline).
Agency Rulemaking: No formal rulemaking period is mandated, but DPS and DSHS will issue technical guidance for API updates. The period between June 2025 and August 2025 will be the critical "testing window" for data interoperability.
Immediate Action Plan
1.IT Audit: Immediately identify every data field in your system that transmits "Sex" or "Gender" to a Texas state agency.
2.Vendor Notification: Contact your EHR, HRIS, or background check software vendors to confirm they are preparing patches for the September 1, 2025 cutover.
3.Update Forms: Redraft physical and digital intake forms to remove non-binary options where the data is destined for the state.
4.Review Insurance: Check Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) for coverage regarding conflicting regulatory requirements (State vs. Federal).
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Software Licensing (SaaS): If you provide software to Texas agencies, you must amend Master Services Agreements (MSAs) to guarantee compliance with HB229. Your software must be patched to restrict gender fields to binary options for Texas clients.
Data Sharing Agreements: Review liability clauses regarding "service interruptions." If your system fails to push data to the state because of a schema mismatch (e.g., sending "Unknown" to a binary-only field), you may be in breach of performance metrics.
Hiring/Training
Intake Protocols: Train front-line staff (admissions, HR, security intake) that "Unknown" or "Decline to State" are no longer valid inputs for state-mandated forms.
Scripting: Provide staff with approved scripts to explain to employees or patients that the State of Texas requires a biological sex classification for processing, removing personal discretion from the employee.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Data Architecture: You must audit all databases that interface with the state (specifically TxEVER for healthcare and DPS Crime Records for security). Map any existing "Non-binary" or "Unknown" legacy data to the new binary standard if the state requires historical data reconciliation.
Dual Reporting Systems: You may need to maintain two sets of demographic data: one for Texas compliance (Binary) and one for Federal compliance (EEOC/Department of Education) which may recognize gender identity.
Fees & Costs
IT Remediation: Budget for internal or vendor costs to reconfigure dropdown menus, API calls, and data validation rules.
No New State Fees: The bill does not impose new filing fees, but the cost of non-compliance (rejected filings) is operational downtime.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Developed to Produce/Fertilize Ova": The law uses a biological capacity definition. It is unclear how agencies will classify individuals with complex medical conditions (e.g., Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome) without genetic testing. Expect DSHS to issue guidance on "default" classifications for these edge cases.
Federal vs. State Standoff: Federal agencies may require gender identity reporting that Texas law now technically prohibits its agencies from collecting. Until the Attorney General issues guidance on this conflict, businesses should prioritize the specific requirements of the receiving agency (e.g., send binary to Texas, send self-ID to Feds).
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The bill author has informed the committee that attacks on the biological identities of women occur throughout everyday life, including through the breach of single-sex spaces like bathrooms, sports teams, prisons, and schools under the guise of what is called equality. The bill author has further informed the committee that this can put women at risk, as it allows biological men to enter spaces meant exclusively for women, eroding women's safety and privacy in places they are meant to feel secure. H.B. 229 addresses these issues by amending the Code Construction Act to define the terms "boy," "father," "female," "woman," "girl," "male," "man," "mother," and "sex." H.B. 229 also amends the Government Code to require governmental entities that collect vital statistics information that identifies the sex of an individual for the purpose of complying with antidiscrimination laws or for the purpose of gathering public health, crime, economic, or other data to identify each individual as either male or female. The bill author has informed the committee that the bill takes these actions to defend women's legal rights through accurate representation in both state statute and data collection practices.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 229 establishes the following legislative findings:
·males and females possess unique immutable biological differences that manifest prior to birth and increase as individuals age and experience puberty;
·biological differences between the sexes mean that only females are able to get pregnant, give birth, and breastfeed children and that males are, on average, bigger, stronger, and faster than females;
·biological differences between the sexes leave females more physically vulnerable than males to specific forms of violence, including sexual violence;
·females have historically suffered discrimination in education, athletics, and employment;
·biological differences between the sexes are enduring and may, in some circumstances, warrant the creation of separate social, educational, athletic, or other spaces in order to ensure individuals' safety and allow members of each sex to succeed and thrive;
·inconsistencies in court rulings and policy initiatives with regard to the definitions of "sex," "male," "female," "man," and "woman" have led to endangerment of single-sex spaces and resources, necessitating clarification of certain terms;
·in the context of biological sex, "equal" does not mean "same" or "identical" and separate is not inherently unequal;
·there are legitimate reasons to distinguish between the sexes with respect to athletics, prisons and other correctional facilities, domestic violence shelters, rape crisis centers, locker rooms, restrooms, and other areas where biology, safety, or privacy are implicated; and
·policies and laws that distinguish between the sexes are subject to intermediate constitutional scrutiny, which forbids unfair discrimination against similarly situated males and females but allows the law to distinguish between the sexes where such distinctions are substantially related to important governmental objectives.
H.B. 229 amends the Government Code to define the following terms under the Code Construction Act for the purpose of the application of the definitions, unless the statute or context in which the word or phrase is used requires a different definition:
·"boy" means a child of the male sex;
·"father" means a parent of the male sex;
·"female" and "woman" mean an individual whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova;
·"girl" means a child of the female sex;
·"male" and "man" mean an individual whose biological reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova of a female;
·"mother" means a parent of the female sex; and
·"sex" means an individual's biological sex, either male or female.
H.B. 229 requires a governmental entity that collects vital statistics information that identifies the sex of an individual for the purpose of complying with antidiscrimination laws or for the purpose of gathering public health, crime, economic, or other data to identify each individual as either male or female. The bill defines "governmental entity" for this purpose by reference as an institution, board, commission, or department of the state, a subdivision of the state, or a political subdivision of the state, including a municipality, a county, or any kind of district.
Honorable Ken King, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB229 by Troxclair (Relating to general definitions for and collection of governmental information regarding biological sex.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB229, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($2,568,300) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2026
($2,568,300)
2027
$0
2028
$0
2029
$0
2030
$0
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1
2026
($2,568,300)
2027
$0
2028
$0
2029
$0
2030
$0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would require a governmental entity that collects vital statistics information that identifies the sex of an individual for the purpose of complying with antidiscrimination laws or for the purpose of gathering public health, crime, economic, or other data to identify each individual as either male or female.
Methodology
According to the Department of Public Safety (DPS), the Crime Records Division (CRD) collects Male, Female, and Unknown data for criminal justice systems, records, and state repositories. To comply with the provisions of the bill, each CRD data repository would require programming updates to prohibit the use of Unknown as a identifier. DPS estimates $2,370,000 in General Revenue Funds for fiscal year 2026 only. Additionally, DPS estimates $198,300 in General Revenue Funds in fiscal year 2026 only to update training materials, system documentation, audit guidelines, and other supporting documents to reflect the update to CRD data repositories.
According to the Department of State Health Services (DSHS), all births, deaths and fetal deaths are electronically reported through the Texas Electronic Vital Events Registrar (TxEVER). DSHS currently lists the biological sex on the birth, death, and fetal death certificates, and TxEVER provides options for male, female, and unknown/not yet determined. DSHS would work with the TxEVER vendor to remove the options for unknown/not yet determined. This can be completed with existing resources.
Technology
DPS estimates $2,370,000 in General Revenue Funds for fiscal year 2026 only for change orders to update CRD data repositories.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
405 Department of Public Safety, 537 State Health Services, Department of
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, WP, ER, APA, KVEL
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB229 mandates a strict binary (Male/Female) classification for all data collected by Texas governmental entities, effectively eliminating "Unknown," "Non-binary," or "X" markers from state databases. While the law targets government agencies, it creates an immediate technical imperative for private entities (healthcare, security, HR, and government contractors) that submit data to state repositories to reconfigure their systems to match this binary standard or face submission rejections. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025 (State systems, including TxEVER and Crime Records, are expected to reject non-compliant data on this date.
Q
Who authored HB229?
HB229 was authored by Texas Representative Ellen Troxclair during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB229 signed into law?
HB229 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB229?
HB229 is enforced by Department of Public Safety (DPS), Department of State Health Services (DSHS) and All Texas Governmental Entities (State, County, Municipal).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB229?
The compliance urgency for HB229 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB229?
The cost impact of HB229 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB229 address?
HB229 addresses topics including health, health--privacy/use of information, human relations, women and vital statistics & records.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.