Relating to the authority to cancel certain elections on a measure to authorize the issuance of bonds.
LowStandard timeline
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Local Governing Bodies (School Boards, City Councils, MUD Boards) • County Election Officers
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Immediate effect).
Compliance Deadline: Immediate. This statute applies to any bond elections scheduled for the November 2025 uniform election date.
Agency Rulemaking: No state-level rulemaking is required. Local governing bodies must adopt internal procedures to utilize this authority immediately.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Update Election Calendars: Mark the 90th day (start of eligibility) and 74th day (deadline to act) before the next election on all compliance calendars.
2.Audit Vendor Contracts: Election services vendors must ensure contracts protect revenue for work completed prior to a Day 74 cancellation.
3.Draft Emergency Protocols: Governing bodies should pre-approve a "Disaster Cancellation Protocol" to ensure they can convene and vote rapidly if a disaster declaration is issued.
4.Verify Insurance: Confirm that Directors and Officers (D&O) liability insurance covers decisions made under emergency statutory provisions.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Election Services Agreements (ESAs): Vendors and County Election Officers must review contracts with local entities. Ensure "Cancellation Clauses" explicitly state that fees for services already rendered (ballot programming, equipment logic testing) are due and payable even if the entity cancels the election under HB2253.
Contingent Development Agreements: Construction and infrastructure developers with contracts contingent on bond funding should review "Force Majeure" clauses to account for potential 6-12 month delays if a bond election is scrubbed due to disaster.
Hiring/Training
Legal Counsel & Board Secretaries: Must be trained on the strict 74-day deadline. If a disaster strikes on the 70th day before an election, this statute cannot be used.
Risk Management: Staff must understand that "harm to voters" or "damage to infrastructure" are the only valid justifications and must be tied to the Governor's declaration.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Template Resolutions: Legal teams must draft a "Resolution to Cancel Bond Election" template that cites the specific statutory grounds (HB2253) and the Governor’s specific Disaster Declaration.
Meeting Minutes: If the cancellation meeting does not adhere to standard 72-hour Open Meetings Act notice due to the disaster, minutes must explicitly document *why* standard notice was "impracticable."
Physical Notice: You must prepare to physically post cancellation notices at every polling place that *would* have been used. Digital notice is insufficient.
Fees & Costs
Sunk Costs: Entities must budget for the reality that costs incurred prior to Day 74 (legal fees, publication costs) are sunk and cannot be reimbursed via bond proceeds if the election is canceled.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The "74-Day Cliff": The statute is silent regarding disasters that occur between Day 73 and Election Day. Business logic dictates that after Day 74, the election must proceed regardless of the disaster, unless a court intervenes.
"To the Extent Practicable": The law allows relaxed meeting notice requirements. This is a litigation trap. If electricity and internet are functional, entities should strictly adhere to the Texas Open Meetings Act to avoid accusations of using a disaster to kill a bond measure in secret.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Under current state law, elections can be canceled if the authority that orders an election on a measure determines that the action to be authorized by the voters may not be taken, declares the measure moot, and removes the measure from the ballot. However, the bill author has informed the committee that there are limited options for cancelling elections due to emergencies such as natural disasters, including situations where a disaster declaration is issued by the governor, which may affect a jurisdiction's ability to conduct an election. C.S.H.B. 2253 seeks to grant authorities the ability to cancel certain elections on a measure to authorize the issuance of bonds if a disaster declaration is issued by the governor.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2253 amends the Election Code to authorize an authority that ordered an election on a measure to authorize the issuance of bonds, not later than the 74th day before election day, to cancel the election on the measure if the following conditions are met:
·not earlier than the 90th day before the date of the election on the measure, the governor issues a disaster declaration under the Texas Disaster Act of 1975 regarding a natural disaster or other disaster threatening the health, safety, or general welfare of the authority's residents; and
·the governing body of the authority, after holding an open meeting under the bill's provisions, determines by majority vote that canceling the election on the measure is necessary:
odue to damage to the authority's election system;
oto avoid harm to the authority's election workers; or
oto avoid harm to voters within the authority's jurisdiction.
The bill authorizes the governing body of an authority to hold an open meeting solely to deliberate whether to cancel an election on a measure to authorize the issuance of bonds due to the issuance of a disaster declaration described by the bill's provisions. The bill requires the governing body, to the extent practicable under the circumstances, to provide reasonable public notice of the meeting and allow members of the public and the press to observe the meeting.
C.S.H.B. 2253 requires the authority holding an election on a measure, if the election is canceled, to post notice of the cancellation during early voting by personal appearance and on election day, at each polling place that would have been used for the election on the measure and authorizes a county election officer to use a single combined notice of cancellation for all authorities for which the officer provides election services under contract and that cancel an election on a measure under the bill's provisions.
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2253 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
While both the introduced and the substitute authorize an authority that ordered an election on a measure to cancel the election on the measure if, not earlier than the 90th day before the date of the election on the measure, the governor issues a disaster declaration under the Texas Disaster Act of 1975, the versions differ in the following ways:
·the substitute limits the elections on measures that may be cancelled to elections on measures to authorize the issuance of bonds, whereas the introduced did not;
·whereas the introduced specified that the disaster declaration was a declaration covering an area within the authority's jurisdiction, the substitute specifies that the declaration is a declaration regarding a natural disaster or other disaster threatening the health, safety, or general welfare of the authority's residents; and
·the substitute also conditions an authority's authorization to cancel the election on the governing body of the authority, after holding an open meeting, determining by a majority vote that canceling the election on the measure is necessary due to damage to the authority's election system, to avoid harm to the authority's election workers, or to avoid harm to voters within the authority's jurisdiction, whereas the introduced did not.
The substitute includes an authorization absent from the introduced for the governing body of an authority to hold an open meeting solely to deliberate whether to cancel an election on a measure to authorize the issuance of bonds due to the issuance of a disaster declaration described by the substitute's provisions. The substitute also includes a requirement absent from the introduced for the governing body, to the extent practicable under the circumstances, to provide reasonable public notice of the meeting and allow members of the public and the press to observe the meeting.
The substitute omits the requirement from the introduced for the authority that ordered an election on a measure required following the submission of a petition signed by a number of registered voters that is canceled under the introduced version's provisions to order a new election on the measure for the first available uniform election day after the canceled election.
Effective immediately, HB2253 grants political subdivisions (MUDs, ISDs, Municipalities) the statutory authority to cancel ordered bond elections if a Governor-declared disaster occurs within 90 days of the election. This creates a critical "off-ramp" for public entities but introduces revenue uncertainty for election vendors, bond counsel, and construction firms with contingent contracts tied to bond passage. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Immediate effect).
Q
Who authored HB2253?
HB2253 was authored by Texas Representative Salman Bhojani during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB2253 signed into law?
HB2253 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB2253?
HB2253 is enforced by Local Governing Bodies (School Boards, City Councils, MUD Boards) and County Election Officers.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB2253?
The compliance urgency for HB2253 is rated as "low". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB2253?
The cost impact of HB2253 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB2253 address?
HB2253 addresses topics including disaster preparedness & relief, elections, elections--general, governor and open meetings.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.