Relating to fiscal transparency for bonds issued by local governmental entities.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-05-28
Enforcing Agencies
Bond Review Board • Office of the Attorney General
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date:May 28, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. Any bond election scheduled after May 28, 2025, requires adherence to the 20-day pre-election reporting window. The first annual report for unissued bonds is due September 30, 2025.
Agency Rulemaking: The BRB has until September 1, 2026, to fully launch the public online database.
*Regulatory Gray Zone:* Between May 2025 and September 2026, you are legally required to report, but the automated system may not exist. You must file via interim methods (email/PDF) established by the BRB to preserve the legality of your bond issuances.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Audit Election Calendar: Identify any bond elections scheduled for the remainder of 2025. Calculate the "20-day prior" deadline immediately.
2.Assign Liability: Execute a memo or contract addendum defining whether Legal Counsel or Financial Advisors will physically submit the reports to the BRB.
3.Establish Interim Protocol: Contact the BRB immediately to confirm the submission method (email address or temporary portal) for current elections to ensure you have a paper trail for the Attorney General.
4.Prepare Unissued Inventory: Begin auditing historical election results now to prepare the "Unissued Securities Report" due September 30.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Bond Counsel & Financial Advisor Agreements: You must amend engagement letters to explicitly designate *who* is responsible for generating and submitting HB3526 data.
Underwriting Agreements: Include representations warranting that the issuer is in full compliance with BRB reporting to ensure marketability.
Hiring/Training
Compliance Staff: No new licenses required, but staff must be trained to segregate data by proposition number, not just by aggregate bond package.
Financial Modeling: Financial Advisors must finalize debt service models earlier in the process to meet the "20 days prior to election" reporting deadline.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
You must integrate three new "hard" deadlines into your compliance calendar:
1.Pre-Election Report (T-Minus 20 Days): Submit proposition numbers, purpose, issuance costs, and estimated debt service to the BRB no later than 20 days *before* the election.
2.Post-Election Report (T-Plus 20 Days): Submit voting results and updated financial estimates to the BRB no later than 20 days *after* the election.
3.Annual Unissued Report (Sept 30): Submit a breakdown of all voter-approved but unissued bonds, citing the specific authorizing statute for each.
Fees & Costs
Administrative Costs: Expect a slight increase in professional fees from Bond Counsel or Financial Advisors for the preparation of these additional filings.
No Statutory Fees: The bill does not impose a filing fee payable to the state.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
Interim Filing Protocols: The statute mandates reporting immediately, but the database won't be ready until 2026. The BRB has not yet codified the format for interim submissions (e.g., Excel template vs. PDF). *Watch for immediate guidance from the BRB Executive Director.*
"Any Other Information": Sections 1231.025(a)(6) and (b)(5) grant the BRB broad discretion to request additional data. Expect administrative rulemaking to expand reporting requirements beyond the statutory text in late 2025.
Debt Service Calculations: The requirement to report "estimated minimum annual debt service" is open to interpretation regarding interest rate assumptions. You must document your methodology to defend against potential OAG inquiries.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
According to the comptroller of pubic accounts, local governments in Texas frequently issue bonds to finance infrastructure projects and other public initiatives through the use of general obligation bonds, which require voter approval. However, the bill author has informed the committee that taxpayers and stakeholders often struggle to access clear and comprehensive financial information about these bonds, causing a lack of fiscal transparency that can lead to confusion about how bond proceeds are used, potential tax impacts, and the overall financial health of local government entities. C.S.H.B. 3526 seeks to enhance fiscal transparency for bonds issued by local government entities and ensure taxpayers have easy access to relevant financial information by standardizing reporting and public disclosure requirements with respect to local government bond proposals or issuances, related election information, voter-approved but unused bonds, and the repayment of voter-approved bonds.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Bond Review Board in SECTIONS 2 and 3 of this bill.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3526 amends the Government Code to require the Bond Review Board to develop and maintain on the board's website a publicly accessible and searchable database that provides, in a table format that is easy to read and understand, information on each bond proposed or issued by a local government. The bill requires the database to include for each proposed and issued bond listed in the database the amount of the principal of the bond, the estimated amount of interest on the bond, and the estimated total amount to pay the principal of and interest on the bond. The bill requires the board, as soon as practicable but not later than September 1, 2026, to establish the database.
C.S.H.B. 3526 requires a local government to submit the following reports to the Bond Review Board:
·not later than the 20th day before election day for an election to authorize the local government to issue bonds, a report that includes the following information:
othe date of the election;
othe proposition number for each bond proposition;
othe total estimated cost of the issuance of each proposed bond;
oa description of the purpose of each bond proposition; and
oany other information the board determines necessary; and
·not later than the 20th day after election day for an election to authorize a local government to issue bonds, a report that includes the following information:
othe total number of votes cast for each bond proposition;
othe total number of votes in support of the bond proposition;
othe total number of votes against the bond proposition;
oany updated information different from the information provided to the board in the report sent prior to election day, if applicable; and
oany other information the board determines necessary.
The bill requires the Bond Review Board to publish a report on the results of an election to authorize a local government to issue bonds on the board's website.
C.S.H.B. 3526 requires a local government with voter-approved but unissued bonds, not later than September 30 of each year, to submit a report to the Bond Review Board regarding the amount of voter-approved but unissued bonds authorized by the local government during the most recent fiscal year and requires the report to include the following information:
·the total amount of voter-approved but unissued bonds authorized by the local government;
·the specific statute or law authorizing the issuance of the bonds;
·the number of the propositions that authorized the issuance of the bonds, as applicable;
·the estimated cost of the issuance of the bonds on the bond proposition, as applicable; and
·any other information the board determines necessary.
The bill authorizes the Bond Review Board to adopt rules to implement these bill provisions relating to an annual local unissued securities report.
C.S.H.B. 3526 requires the Bond Review Board, not later than December 31 of each even-numbered year, to prepare and submit to each standing committee of the legislature with primary jurisdiction over matters relating to finance a report on the repayment status of each voter-approved bond issued by a local government. The bill requires the report to include the following:
·for each voter-approved bond issued by a local government, the estimated total amount required to pay the principal of and interest on the bond on the date the bond was issued and the total amount of principal and interest paid by the local government on the bond; and
·if a local government requires an increase in the local government's tax rate in order to pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued by the local government, the amount of the required increase.
The bill authorizes the board to adopt any rules necessary to implement these bill provisions relating to the board's biennial report on the repayment of bonds issued by local government. The bill includes such a report among the reports for which the attorney general is required to send to the board information the attorney general collects on public securities issued by a municipal corporation or political subdivision of the state.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3526 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
The substitute includes the following provisions absent from the introduced relating to required reporting by local governments to the Bond Review Board:
·a provision requiring a local government to submit a report to the board not later than the 20th day before the day of an election to authorize the local government to issue bonds;
·a provision requiring a local government to submit a report to the board not later than the 20th day after the day of an election to authorize a local government to issue bonds;
·a provision requiring a local government with voter-approved but unissued bonds, not later than September 30 of each year, to submit a report to the board regarding the amount of voter-approved but unissued bonds authorized by the local government during the most recent fiscal year;
·provisions relating to the required content of such reports;
·a provision requiring the board to publish a report on the results of an election to authorize a local government to issue bonds on the board's website; and
·a provision authorizing the board to adopt rules to implement the bill's provisions relating to annual local unused securities reports.
Honorable Stan Lambert, Chair, House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB3526 by Capriglione (Relating to fiscal transparency for bonds issued by local governmental entities.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3526, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($290,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2026
($210,000)
2027
($80,000)
2028
($80,000)
2029
($80,000)
2030
($80,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2025
2026
($210,000)
1.0
2027
($80,000)
1.0
2028
($80,000)
1.0
2029
($80,000)
1.0
2030
($80,000)
1.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Government Code to direct the Bond Review Board (BRB) to develop and maintain a publicly accessible and searchable database containing certain information on each bond proposed or issued by a local government.
The bill would direct the BRB to submit a report not later than December 31 of each even-numbered year to each standing committee of the legislature with primary jurisdiction over matters relating to finance.
Methodology
It is anticipated the BRB would need one additional FTE (Program Specialist I or II). The total FTE-related cost is estimated to be $160,000 for the 2026-27 biennium.
Technology
The BRB estimates a one-time cost of $130,000 in fiscal year 2026 to design and build the website.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
302 Office of the Attorney General, 352 Bond Review Board
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, FV, LCO, KCu
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
Effective immediately, HB3526 mandates that all local governmental entities submit detailed financial reports to the Bond Review Board (BRB) before and after bond elections, as well as annually for unissued bonds. This shifts transparency data from a "best practice" to a statutory prerequisite for Attorney General approval of bond transcripts; failure to comply puts bond closing and fund release at material risk. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: May 28, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Q
Who authored HB3526?
HB3526 was authored by Texas Representative Giovanni Capriglione during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB3526 signed into law?
HB3526 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 28, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB3526?
HB3526 is enforced by Bond Review Board and Office of the Attorney General.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB3526?
The compliance urgency for HB3526 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB3526?
The cost impact of HB3526 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB3526 address?
HB3526 addresses topics including elections, elections--general, electronic information systems, bonds and attorney general.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.