Relating to direct payment for certain health care provided by a hospital.
CriticalImmediate action required
High Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date:June 20, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Compliance Deadline:June 20, 2025. All bills sent on or after this date must contain the mandatory notice. Billing systems must be capable of recalculating balances upon request immediately.
Agency Rulemaking: While the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) has enforcement authority, the statute is self-executing. Do not wait for agency guidance to implement the billing notice or fee caps.
Immediate Action Plan
Immediate: Order IT/Billing vendors to add the Section 311.006(b) notice to all patient statement templates before June 20.
Finance: Calculate your AGB + 25% and identify your lowest commercial fee schedule + 50%. Determine which is higher to set your new self-pay pricing floor.
Legal: Audit your lowest-paying commercial payer contract. Determine if the volume from that payer justifies the risk of it setting the price cap for all uninsured patients.
Operations: Issue a memo to billing staff: Any request for "direct payment" received within 60 days of a bill must be escalated for re-rating, not sent to collections.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Managed Care Agreements: Review your lowest-reimbursing commercial contract immediately. Because the statutory cap can be pegged to your "lowest contracted rate," a single low-performing contract now creates a revenue ceiling for your entire self-pay population.
RCM & Vendor MSAs: Amend Master Services Agreements with third-party billing and collection vendors. Insert indemnification clauses holding them liable if they fail to include the statutory notice on patient statements by June 20.
Hiring/Training
Patient Access & Billing Staff: Train staff to identify "non-enrollees" (patients without health benefit plan coverage).
Dispute Resolution: Establish a protocol for the 60-day window. If a patient requests direct payment within 60 days of the bill date, staff must have the authority and tools to re-rate the claim immediately.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Mandatory Billing Notice: You must alter your final billing template to include a statement informing the patient of their right to request direct payment under Section 311.006(b).
Audit Trail: Maintain a documented, quarterly calculation of:
1. Your IRS-defined "Amounts Generally Billed" (AGB).
2. Your lowest commercial contracted rate per service line.
You must be able to prove to regulators how you derived the final billed amount.
Fees & Costs
Revenue Impact: Expect a mandatory write-down of Accounts Receivable (AR) for self-pay patients who exercise this right.
System Costs: Budget for immediate IT spend to reprogram billing logic to handle the "Greater of AGB+25% OR Lowest Contract+50%" calculation.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Enrollee" Definition: The statute applies to patients not "entitled to coverage." It is unclear if patients who *have* insurance but choose not to use it (cash-pay for privacy) are eligible for the cap. Until HHSC clarifies, assume a strict interpretation: if they have coverage, they are an enrollee, and the cap does not apply.
Granularity of "Lowest Rate": The law does not specify if the "lowest contracted rate" is calculated per CPT code, per DRG, or in aggregate. We advise calculating this on a per-service basis to ensure defensibility during an audit.
Bundled Services: Application of the cap to bundled services (where line items are not individually contracted) remains undefined.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The bill author has informed the committee that some hospitals charge their patients different prices for the same procedures, depending on the patients' insurance, or lack thereof. C.S.H.B. 1612 seeks to address this issue by limiting what hospitals are allowed to charge their uninsured patients.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1612 amends the Health and Safety Code to require a licensed public or private hospital, not including a licensed ambulatory surgical center, to accept directly from a patient who is not enrolled in a health benefit plan or otherwise entitled to coverage under such a plan full payment for a health care service provided by the hospital at the patient's request. The bill requires such a request to be made not later than the 60th day after the date on which the patient receives a bill for or other final accounting of the health care service provided. The bill authorizes a hospital, in accepting payments under the bill's provisions for health care services provided by the hospital, to change patients' amounts that are either:
·not more than 25 percent greater than the amounts generally billed, as defined by federal law for a health care service; or
·not more than 50 percent greater than the lowest contracted rate for the service that the hospital has agreed to accept as payment in full as a contracted, preferred, or participating provider of a health benefit plan other than the following:
oCHIP;
oMedicare; or
othe state Medicaid program, including the Medicaid managed care program.
C.S.H.B. 1612 defines the following terms for purposes of the bill's provisions:
·"enrollee" means an individual who is enrolled in a health benefit plan or otherwise entitled to coverage under a health benefit plan;
·"health benefit plan" means any individual or group arrangement with a public or private entity under which the entity will pay for, reimburse expenses for, or otherwise contract with a health care provider for the provision of health care services, supplies, or devices to a patient, including an arrangement with:
oan insurance company;
othe sponsor or administrator of a self-insured health benefit plan;
oa group hospital service corporation or a health maintenance organization operating under applicable state law;
othe state Medicaid program, including the Medicaid managed care program;
oa health benefit plan offered or administered by or on behalf of the state or a political subdivision of the state or an agency or instrumentality of the state or a political subdivision of the state, including a basic coverage plan under the Texas Employees Group Benefits Act, TRS-Care, TRS-ActiveCare, and a plan providing basic coverage under the State University Employees Uniform Insurance Benefits Act; or
oany other entity providing a health insurance or health benefit plan subject to regulation by the Texas Department of Insurance; and
·"health care service" means a service to diagnose, prevent, alleviate, cure, or heal a human illness or injury that is provided to an individual by a physician or other health care provider.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1612 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
The substitute authorizes a hospital, in accepting payments directly from a patient for a health care service provided by the hospital, to change patients' amounts that are either not more than 25 percent greater than the amounts generally billed, as defined by federal law for a health care service, or not more than 50 percent greater than the lowest contracted rate for the service that the hospital has agreed to accept as payment in full as a contracted, preferred, or participating provider of a certain health benefit, whereas the introduced caps the amount of such payment for a service provided by the hospital at not more than 25 percent greater than the lowest contracted rate for the health care service that the hospital has agreed to accept as payment in full as a contracted, preferred, or participating provider of a certain health benefit plan.
Honorable Gary VanDeaver, Chair, House Committee on Public Health
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB1612 by Frank (Relating to direct payment for certain health care provided by a hospital.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
323 Teacher Retirement System, 327 Employees Retirement System, 454 Department of Insurance, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 720 The University of Texas System Administration
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, NPe, BFa
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB1612 imposes a statutory price ceiling on hospital charges for self-pay patients and mandates a "right to request" notice on every final bill. Effective immediately on June 20, 2025, due to a supermajority vote, Chapter 241 hospitals must cap charges for non-enrollees at the greater of AGB plus 25% or the lowest commercial contracted rate plus 50%. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Q
Who authored HB1612?
HB1612 was authored by Texas Representative James Frank during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB1612 signed into law?
HB1612 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB1612?
HB1612 is enforced by Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB1612?
The compliance urgency for HB1612 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB1612?
The cost impact of HB1612 is estimated as "high". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB1612 address?
HB1612 addresses topics including health care providers, hospitals, insurance and insurance--health & accident.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.