Relating to genetic information security for residents of this state; providing a civil penalty; providing a private cause of action.
CriticalImmediate action required
High Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Office of the Attorney General
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority passage).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate for hardware prohibitions and data storage restrictions. December 31, 2025, is the deadline for the first annual certification filing.
Agency Rulemaking: The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) is expected to publish the specific form/portal for the annual certification. Until then, entities must operate under the assumption of strict statutory interpretation regarding "inaccessible" data.
Immediate Action Plan
Immediate Inventory Audit: Identify all genome sequencers and software. Cross-reference manufacturers against the 15 C.F.R. 791.4 Foreign Adversary list (specifically check for BGI/MGI equipment).
Decommission Prohibited Tech: Cease use of any identified prohibited hardware immediately to avoid daily penalties.
Retain Counsel: Secure an attorney specifically to review your compliance status and sign the December 31 certification.
Geofence Data: Instruct IT to implement blocks on all traffic to/from prohibited nations regarding genomic data servers.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Cloud & Storage MSAs: Must be amended to explicitly guarantee that Texas resident genomic data is never stored in, or accessible from, a "Foreign Adversary" nation (currently China, Russia, Iran, North Korea).
Vendor Procurement: New purchase agreements for lab equipment must include warranties of origin and ownership structure to ensure manufacturers are not owned or controlled by prohibited entities.
M&A/Bankruptcy: Asset purchase agreements must disclose restrictions on selling genomic data to foreign entities.
Hiring/Training
Legal Designation: Unlike standard compliance reports, the annual certification must be submitted by an attorney. You must engage outside counsel or formally designate an in-house attorney to assume this specific liability.
IT Security: IT staff require immediate training on implementing strict IP blocking and Access Control Lists (ACLs) to geofence data from prohibited jurisdictions.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Annual Certification: A mandatory filing to the OAG by December 31 each year, certifying compliance with Chapter 174.
Hardware Audit Trail: Maintain a permanent log of country-of-origin and ownership for all sequencers and sequencing software.
Data Residency Verification: Documentation proving physical server locations for all cloud-stored genomic data.
Fees & Costs
"Rip and Replace" Costs: High capital expenditure risk. There is no grandfather clause; prohibited equipment owned prior to the effective date must be decommissioned.
Litigation Reserves: The law creates a private cause of action with $5,000 statutory damages per violation, creating immediate class-action exposure.
Civil Penalties: $10,000 per violation payable to the State.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Inaccessible": The statute requires data be inaccessible to persons in prohibited countries. It is unclear if incidental internet routing constitutes a violation. Strategy: Assume a strict standard; logical and physical access must be affirmatively blocked.
"Resident of this State": The law lacks a verification mechanism for residency. Strategy: If you process de-identified data or biobank samples, treat *all* data as subject to the Act unless you can affirmatively prove the subject is a non-resident.
"Related Equipment": The definition of software includes "related equipment," which may extend to firmware on peripheral devices.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs
Committee Report (Substituted)
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
According to the Asian Development Bank, the 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China (PRC) identifies dominance in biotechnology as critical to strengthening the PRC's science and technological power, and the U.S. Department of State reports that the PRC is implementing an aggressive military-civil fusion strategy to develop the most technologically advanced military in the world. The bill author has informed the committee that a foreign adversary company houses the world's largest gene bank, which could give it a decided commercial advantage in developing pharmaceuticals and other health care solutions. Further, because biotechnology is often stressed as an important component to national power in foreign adversary military literature, the flow of U.S. IP and genetic data to the medical infrastructure of foreign adversaries' militaries may be considered a crucial component of this effort. C.S.H.B. 130 seeks to prevent foreign adversary companies from being able to collect and weaponize Texan genomic data by prohibiting foreign adversary genomic sequencers from being used in medical and research facilities in Texas. The bill would also require that Texan genomic data only be stored at a location in the United States.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 130 amends the Health and Safety Code to establish the Texas Genomic Act of 2025 for the purpose of ensuring that a medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization that conducts research on or testing of genome sequencing or the human genome in Texas and acting on behalf of a foreign adversary does not gain access to the genetic information of Texas residents. The bill establishes that it is the state's policy to oppose the collection and analysis of genomic information by a foreign adversary or for use by a foreign adversary and to support sanctions the U.S. Department of Commerce or the U.S. Department of Defense imposes on a medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization engaged in the collection and analysis of genomic information for use by a foreign adversary.
C.S.H.B. 130 prohibits a medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization subject to the bill's provisions from using a genome sequencer or software produced by or on behalf of the following:
·a foreign adversary;
·a state-owned enterprise of a foreign adversary;
·a company or nonprofit organization domiciled within the borders of a country that is a foreign adversary; or
·an owned or controlled subsidiary or affiliate of a company or nonprofit organization domiciled within the borders of a country that is a foreign adversary.
The bill requires such a medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization to do the following:
·store all such genome sequencing data of Texas residents only at a location in the United States;
·for such a facility, company, or organization that stores genome sequencing data of Texas residents, including storage of genome sequencing data through a contract with a third-party data storage company, ensure the security of the genome sequencing data using reasonable encryption methods, restriction on access, and other cybersecurity best practices; and
·ensure genome sequencing data of Texas residents, other than open data, is inaccessible to any person located within the borders of a country that is a foreign adversary.
C.S.H.B. 130 requires such a facility, company, or organization to certify to the attorney general that the facility, company, or organization is in compliance with the bill's provisions not later than December 31 of each year and requires an attorney representing the facility, company, or organization to submit the certification. The bill authorizes the attorney general to investigate an allegation of a violation of the bill's provisions and authorizes any person to notify the attorney general of such a violation or potential violation.
C.S.H.B. 130 makes a medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization that violates the bill's provisions liable to the state for a civil penalty of $10,000 for each violation. The bill authorizes the attorney general to bring an action to recover that civil penalty in a district court in Travis County or in a county in which any part of the violation occurs. The bill requires the attorney general to deposit a civil penalty collected under these provisions in the state treasury to the credit of the general revenue fund. The bill authorizes the attorney general to recover reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the civil penalty, including court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, investigative costs, witness fees, and deposition expenses.
C.S.H.B. 130 authorizes a Texas resident who is a patient or research subject of a medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization subject to the bill's provisions and who is harmed by the storage or use of the patient's or subject's genome sequencing data in violation of those provisions to bring an action in the county in which the plaintiff resides against the facility, company, or organization that committed the violation. The bill entitles such an individual to obtain the following:
·the greater of the following:
oactual damages; or
ostatutory damages in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each violation; and
·court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
The bill exempts an action brought under these provisions from Civil Practice and Remedies Code provisions relating to the standards for recovery of exemplary damages and factors precluding such recovery.
C.S.H.B. 130 defines the following terms for purposes of its provisions:
·"company" as a sole proprietorship, organization, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company that exists to make a profit, including a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary, parent company, or affiliate of those entities or business associations;
·"domicile" as the country in which:
oa company or nonprofit organization is formed, incorporated, or registered and headquartered;
oa company's or nonprofit organization's affairs are primarily conducted; or
othe majority of the company's ownership shares are held;
·"foreign adversary" by reference to federal regulations relating to the determination of foreign adversaries;
·"genome sequencer" as any device or platform used to conduct genome sequencing, resequencing, or isolation or other genome research;
·"genome sequencing" as any method used to determine the identity and order of nucleotide bases in the human genome;
·"human genome" as the set of DNA found in human cells;
·"medical facility" as a facility licensed or registered by a state or federal agency to provide health care services that receives any state funding, including pass-through federal money provided to a state agency for grant awards; and
·"software" as computer programs and related equipment used for genome sequencing or the operation, control, analysis, research, or other functions of genome sequencers.
C.S.H.B. 130 applies only to a cause of action that accrues on or after the bill's effective date. A cause of action that accrues before the bill's effective date is governed by the law in effect on the date the cause of action accrued, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 130 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
The substitute revises the provision of the introduced requiring a medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization subject to the bill's provisions to ensure genome sequencing data of Texas residents, other than open data, is inaccessible to any person located outside of the United States by requiring such an entity to ensure that data is inaccessible instead to any person located within the borders of a country that is a foreign adversary. Additionally, the substitute omits the provisions from the introduced that authorized such a medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization that stores such data to apply to the attorney general in the form and manner prescribed by attorney general rule to allow remote access to such data by persons located outside of the United States and that authorized the attorney general to allow such access after making certain determinations.
The substitute includes a provision absent from the introduced authorizing an action brought by a Texas resident who is a patient or research subject of a medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization subject to the bill's provisions and who is harmed by the storage or use of the patient's or subject's genome sequencing data in violation of the bill's provisions to be brought in the county in which the plaintiff resides.
Honorable Cole Hefner, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB130 by Bonnen (Relating to genetic information security for residents of this state; providing a civil penalty; providing a private cause of action.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that any costs or revenue implications resulting from the implementation of the bill would be insignificant.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 503 Texas Medical Board, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 537 State Health Services, Department of, 542 Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 720 The University of Texas System Administration, 758 Texas State University System, 768 Texas Tech University System Administration, 769 University of North Texas System Administration, 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board, 783 University of Houston System Administration
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, MGol, LBO, BCa, WP
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
The Texas Genomic Act of 2025 (HB130) mandates the immediate removal of genomic sequencing hardware and software originating from foreign adversaries (e. g. , China, Russia) and imposes strict data localization requirements.
Q
Who authored HB130?
HB130 was authored by Texas Representative Greg Bonnen during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB130 signed into law?
HB130 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB130?
HB130 is enforced by Office of the Attorney General.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB130?
The compliance urgency for HB130 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB130?
The cost impact of HB130 is estimated as "high". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB130 address?
HB130 addresses topics including health, health--general, health--other diseases & medical conditions, intergovernmental relations and charitable & nonprofit organizations.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.