Relating to certain practices of health benefit plan issuers to encourage the use of certain physicians and health care providers and rank physicians.
CriticalImmediate action required
Medium Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Department of Insurance
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025.
Compliance Deadline:July 18, 2025. You must issue the required 45-day notices to physicians regarding their rankings/classifications prior to the September 1 effective date to ensure uninterrupted network management.
Agency Rulemaking:Critical Dependency. The Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) must adopt rules designating standard-setting organizations (Section 1460.005) before you can legally rank physicians. If TDI fails to adopt rules by 9/1/2025, all physician ranking programs must be suspended until rules are finalized to avoid statutory violation.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Audit Steering Logic: Immediately review all tiered network algorithms. If a tier is based *solely* on unit cost, it violates the impending fiduciary standard; integrate quality metrics immediately.
2.Monitor Rulemaking: Assign regulatory affairs staff to track TDI's docket for the designation of standard-setting organizations.
3.Build the Portal: Commission the IT build for the physician dispute portal now to ensure it is operational for the July 2025 notice cycle.
4.Update Notices: Draft the "Methodology Disclosure" templates to comply with the 45-day advance notice requirement.
5.Review Insurance: Consult with your E&O carrier to ensure your policy covers the new statutory fiduciary liability created by Sections 843.322(b) and 1301.0047(b).
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Vendor MSAs (Analytics/Network Management): You must amend agreements with third-party vendors (e.g., Optum, Cotiviti) to include strict indemnification clauses for breaches of the new fiduciary standard caused by their data.
Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Vendor contracts must mandate data dispute resolution within the statutory 30-day window.
Provider Agreements: Review data-sharing provisions to ensure you have the contractual right to disclose the specific performance metrics used for ranking, as required by the new transparency rules.
Hiring/Training
Utilization Management (UM) & Network Teams: Staff must be retrained to document that every steering decision or tier placement is for the "primary benefit of the enrollee." Cost savings alone are no longer a sufficient defense without a documented quality component.
Dispute Resolution Staff: Designate specific personnel to manage the physician dispute channel to ensure the 30-day statutory deadline is met.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Pre-Publication Notice: You must retain proof of delivery for the 45-day advance written notice sent to physicians regarding their ranking.
Quality Parity Documentation: You must create internal records proving that "preferred" or "Tier 1" providers are not of "materially lower quality" than non-preferred providers.
Conflict of Interest Logs: Maintain certification that steering is not occurring *solely* because your organization owns or controls the provider group.
Fees & Costs
Litigation Reserves: Legal departments should increase reserves for potential "breach of fiduciary duty" lawsuits regarding adverse outcomes from steered care.
Administrative Costs: Budget for the development of a web-based, "easy-to-use" physician dispute portal.
Penalty Risk: Violation of ranking standards carries a mandatory administrative penalty: the prohibition of using *any* ranking system for at least 12 months.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Primary Benefit": The statute requires steering be for the enrollee's "primary benefit." It is currently undefined whether "lower premiums" constitute a primary benefit or if the benefit must be strictly clinical. Legal counsel must define a defensive position on this prior to Q3 2025.
"Materially Lower Quality": This threshold is subjective. TDI has not defined what constitutes a "material" difference in quality metrics (e.g., readmission rates, infection rates).
Designated Standards: We do not yet know which standard-setting organizations TDI will designate. If they select an organization with high licensing fees or restrictive IP covenants, your current ranking methodology may become obsolete or more expensive.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Currently, the Insurance Code prevents health insurance options that encourage patients to be smart shoppers.
Texas employers would like to be able to utilize health insurance plans for their employees that not only share basic information about physician prices but also how they meet nationally recognized quality of care standards. Employers that have used these types of flexible plans where they are allowed have been able to lower health care costs by five percent.
Health care price transparency is rapidly advancing, yet many patients still lack incentives to shop for lower cost, higher quality health care services and providers.
S.B. 926 modernizes the Insurance Code to allow health benefits that incentivize patients to make value-driven health care decisions.
As proposed, S.B. 926 amends current law relating to certain practices of health benefit plan issuers to encourage the use of certain physicians and health care providers and rank physicians.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
Rulemaking authority previously granted to the commissioner of insurance is modified in SECTION 5 (Section 1460.005, Insurance Code) of this bill.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Subchapter I, Chapter 843, Insurance Code, by adding Section 843.322, as follows:
Sec. 843.322. INCENTIVES TO USE CERTAIN PHYSICIANS OR PROVIDERS. (a) Authorizes a health maintenance organization (HMO) to provide incentives for enrollees to use certain physicians or providers through modified deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing provisions.
(b) Provides that a HMO that encourages an enrollee to obtain a health care service from a particular physician or provider, including offering incentives to encourage enrollees to use specific physicians or providers, or that introduces or modifies a tiered network plan or assigns physicians or providers into tiers, has a fiduciary duty to the enrollee or group contract holder to engage in that conduct only for the primary benefit of the enrollee or group contract holder.
SECTION 2. Amends Section 1301.0045(a), Insurance Code, to prohibit Chapter 1301 (Preferred Provider Benefit Plans), except as provided by Sections 1301.0046 (Coinsurance Requirements for Services of Nonpreferred Providers) and 1301.0047, from being construed to limit the level of reimbursement or the level of coverage, including deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing provisions, that are applicable to preferred providers or, for plans other than exclusive provider benefit plans, nonpreferred providers, and to make a nonsubstantive change.
SECTION 3. Amends Subchapter A, Chapter 1301, Insurance Code, by adding Section 1301.0047, as follows:
Sec. 1301.0047. INCENTIVES TO USE CERTAIN PHYSICIANS OR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS. (a) Authorizes an insurer to provide incentives for insureds to use certain physicians or health care providers through modified deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing provisions.
(b) Provides that an insurer that encourages an insured to obtain a health care service from a particular physician or health care provider, including offering incentives to encourage insureds to use specific physicians or providers, or that introduces or modifies a tiered network plan or assigns physicians or providers into tiers, has a fiduciary duty to the insured or policyholder to engage in that conduct only for the primary benefit of the insured or policyholder.
SECTION 4. Amends Section 1460.003, Insurance Code, by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (a-1), as follows:
(a) Prohibits a health benefit plan issuer, including a subsidiary or affiliate, from ranking physicians or classifying physicians into tiers based on performance unless:
(1) the standards used by the health benefit plan issuer to rank or classify are propagated or developed by an organization designated by the commissioner of insurance (commissioner) through rules adopted under Section 1460.005 (Rules; Standards);
(2) the ranking, comparison, or evaluation meets certain criteria; and
(3) each affected physician is given an easy-to-use process to identify discrepancies between the standards and the ranking, comparison, or evaluation as propagated by the health benefit plan issuer.
Deletes existing text prohibiting a health benefit plan issuer, including a subsidiary or affiliate, from publishing physician-specific information that includes rankings, tiers, ratings, or other comparisons of a physician's performance against standards, measures, or other physicians, unless certain criteria are met.
(a-1) Requires a health benefit plan issuer, if a physician submits information to the health benefit plan issuer under Subsection (a)(3) sufficient to establish a discrepancy, to remedy the discrepancy by the later of publication or the 30th day after the date the health benefit plan issuer receives the information.
SECTION 5. Amends Section 1460.005(c), Insurance Code, as follows:
(c) Provides that, in adopting rules under this section, the commissioner is authorized to only designate organizations that meet certain requirements. Deletes existing text requiring the commissioner, in adopting rules under this section, to consider the standards, guidelines, and measures prescribed by nationally recognized organizations that establish or promote guidelines and performance measures emphasizing quality of health care, including the National Quality Forum and the AQA Alliance. Deletes existing text requiring the commissioner, if neither the National Quality Forum nor the AQA Alliance has established standards or guidelines regarding an issue, to consider the standards, guidelines, and measures prescribed by the National Committee on Quality Assurance and other similar national organizations. Deletes existing text requiring the commissioner, if neither the National Quality Forum, nor the AQA Alliance, nor other national organizations have established standards or guidelines regarding an issue, to consider standards, guidelines, and measures based on other bona fide nationally recognized guidelines, expert-based physician consensus quality standards, or leading objective clinical evidence and scholarship.
Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB926 by Hancock (Relating to certain practices of health benefit plan issuers to encourage the use of certain physicians and health care providers and rank physicians.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
327 Employees Retirement System, 454 Department of Insurance, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 720 The University of Texas System Administration
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, NPe, AAL, BFa
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB926 fundamentally transforms the legal relationship between payers and enrollees by imposing a statutory fiduciary duty on insurers and HMOs when steering patients or tiering networks, effective September 1, 2025. This law creates significant new tort liability for "cost-only" steering and grants the Insurance Commissioner the authority to suspend an issuer's ability to use physician ranking systems entirely for 12 months if compliance fails. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025.
Q
Who authored SB926?
SB926 was authored by Texas Senator Kelly Hancock during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB926 signed into law?
SB926 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB926?
SB926 is enforced by Texas Department of Insurance.
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB926?
The compliance urgency for SB926 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB926?
The cost impact of SB926 is estimated as "medium". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB926 address?
SB926 addresses topics including health care providers, insurance, insurance--health & accident, health maintenance organizations and physicians.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.