Relating to the provision of direct patient care by physicians and health care practitioners.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Medical Board • Texas Board of Nursing • Texas State Board of Dental Examiners • Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists • Other Title 3 Occupations Code Licensing Boards
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date:June 20, 2025 (Law is currently active).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. Any Direct Patient Care Agreement entered into on or after June 20, 2025, must comply with Chapter 117 requirements. Agreements executed prior to this date are grandfathered under previous law.
Agency Rulemaking: No specific rulemaking deadline is set, but licensing boards (Medical Board, Dental Board, etc.) retain authority to sanction licensees for non-compliance. Expect future guidance on "hybrid" practice audits.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Draft the Disclosure: Create the mandatory "Not Insurance" notice immediately and integrate it into your digital intake flow.
2.Segregate Billing: Configure your EMR/PMS to automatically suppress claim generation for patients tagged as "Direct Patient Care" for covered services.
3.Review Payer Contracts: Legal counsel must review your current HMO/PPO contracts to ensure offering a direct subscription does not breach your provider participation agreements.
4.Update Marketing: Ensure website and marketing materials clearly distinguish the subscription program from insurance plans to avoid TDI scrutiny.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
New Templates Required: You must replace "Direct Primary Care" or generic "Retainer" headers with "Direct Patient Care Agreement."
Mandatory Disclosure: You must create a standalone written or electronic notice provided to the patient prior to contract execution. This notice must explicitly state that the agreement is not insurance.
Scope Definition: Contracts must clearly define the specific "Health Care Services" covered by the periodic fee to distinguish them from insurance-billable services.
Hiring/Training
Billing Staff: Implement a strict "firewall" protocol. Staff must be trained that services covered by the subscription fee cannot be submitted to an insurer or HMO for reimbursement.
Front Desk/Intake: Staff must be scripted to inform patients that subscription fees do not count toward insurance deductibles.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Audit Trail: You must retain proof (signature or electronic log) that the patient received the "Not Insurance" disclosure *before* signing the main agreement.
Billing Records: Your practice management software must be configured to tag "Direct Care" encounters to prevent accidental claims submission to payers.
Fees & Costs
No New State Fees: There are no filing fees or registration costs with the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI).
Administrative Costs: Budget for legal review of contract templates and potential updates to billing software logic.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The "Hybrid" Trap: The law permits practices to accept insurance for *some* patients while offering direct care to *others*. However, it is vague regarding patients who utilize *both* (e.g., a subscription for visits, but insurance for labs).
*Risk:* If a service is ambiguous (e.g., a "wellness check" that turns into a "diagnostic visit"), billing insurance may be flagged as a violation of Section 117.004.
Payer Contract Conflicts: While the law prohibits insurers from discriminating against you *solely* for offering direct care, it does not void existing "All Products" clauses in HMO contracts. You may still be contractually obligated to bill insurance for covered patients, regardless of your new subscription offering.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The bill author has informed the committee that the rising cost of health care in Texas has made it increasingly difficult for patients to access quality care. State law provides for a direct primary care model, which allows patients to pay an agreed upon fee directly to a physician without interference from insurance companies, but the law currently does not apply to other health care practitioners such as nurses, dentists, or psychologists. H.B. 541 seeks to expand this model to allow for direct pay relationships with any type of health care practitioner, with the goal of improving health care access and outcomes for Texans.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 541 amends the Occupations Code to expand the scope of statutory provisions relating to direct primary care, which is a model under which a physician provides primary medical care services to a patient in exchange for a direct fee, to apply more broadly to direct patient care, which means any health care service provided by a physician or health care practitioner to a patient in exchange for such a fee. The statutory provisions affected by the bill do the following:
·establish the noninsurance nature of direct care;
·prohibit billing an insurer or health maintenance organization (HMO) for direct care paid under an applicable agreement;
·prohibit a state agency, health insurer, HMO, or health care provider from taking certain actions against providers of direct care or persons paying for direct care; and
·require a provider to disclose that an agreement for direct care is not insurance prior to entering into the agreement.
The bill makes corresponding changes to related definitions, including changing the name of an agreement under which direct care is provided from a medical service agreement to a direct patient care agreement and defining the following new terms:
·"health care practitioner" means an individual other than a physician who holds a license, certificate, permit, or other authorization issued under state law to engage in a health care profession and who provides health care in the ordinary course of business or practice of a profession; and
·"health care service" means any care, service, or procedure provided by a physician or health care practitioner, including any medical or psychological diagnosis, treatment, evaluation, advice, or other service that affects the structure or function of the human body.
H.B. 541 applies only to an agreement entered into on or after the bill's effective date. An agreement entered into before that date is governed by the law applicable to the agreement immediately before the bill's effective date, and that law is continued in effect for that purpose.
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2025.
Honorable Gary VanDeaver, Chair, House Committee on Public Health
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB541 by Shaheen (Relating to the provision of direct patient care by physicians and health care practitioners.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
Based on the analysis of the Texas Medical Board, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
503 Texas Medical Board
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, NPe, BFa
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
Effective immediately, Texas law expands the "subscription" or "retainer" healthcare model beyond primary care physicians to include all Title 3 licensed health care practitioners (specialists, dentists, chiropractors, etc. ). HB541 creates a statutory safe harbor exempting these "Direct Patient Care" agreements from insurance regulation, provided businesses strictly adhere to new prohibitions on double-billing and mandatory patient disclosures.
Q
Who authored HB541?
HB541 was authored by Texas Representative Matthew Shaheen during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB541 signed into law?
HB541 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB541?
HB541 is enforced by Texas Medical Board, Texas Board of Nursing, Texas State Board of Dental Examiners, Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists and Other Title 3 Occupations Code Licensing Boards.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB541?
The compliance urgency for HB541 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB541?
The cost impact of HB541 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB541 address?
HB541 addresses topics including health care providers, insurance, insurance--health & accident, occupational regulation and occupational regulation--health occupations.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.