Relating to the execution of a warrant issued for certain releasees who violate a condition of parole or mandatory supervision related to the electronic monitoring of the releasee.

Contracts

• Electronic Monitoring (EM) Vendors: Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with counties and the state must be reviewed. "Notification windows" for strap violations or dead batteries must be tightened to near real-time to align with the "as soon as practicable" statutory requirement.
• Indemnification Clauses: LEAs may seek to amend vendor contracts to shift liability. If a warrant execution is delayed due to a vendor data lag, the vendor may now be held liable for the LEA's statutory failure.

Hiring/Training

• Dispatch Protocols: Dispatchers and warrant officers must be trained to recognize the "SISP – Electronic Monitoring" flag. These warrants must be categorized as "Priority 1" or equivalent, bypassing standard queues.
• Triage Training: Intake staff must be trained to filter incoming warrants immediately upon receipt to identify SISP status.

Reporting & Record-Keeping

• Audit Trails: LEAs must implement immutable logging of two specific timestamps: 1) Receipt of the warrant/violation notice, and 2) Assignment to an active unit.
• Justification Logs: If a warrant is not executed immediately, a contemporaneous log entry explaining the delay (e.g., "force majeure," "all units on active emergency") is required to defend against negligence claims under the "practicable" standard.

Fees & Costs

• No Statutory Fees: The bill does not impose new fees.
• Operational Costs: Agencies should anticipate potential overtime costs associated with the immediate mobilization of officers for off-hour warrant execution.