Relating to an early childhood integrated data system.
LowStandard timeline
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Education Agency (Lead Agency) • Health and Human Services Commission • Texas Workforce Commission • Department of Family and Protective Services
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Immediate effect following supermajority vote).
Compliance Deadline: January 1, 2027. By this date, the system must be fully operational. Providers must ensure their internal software (Student Information Systems/Case Management) can interface with state portals by Q4 2026.
Agency Rulemaking: The Texas Education Agency (TEA), as the lead agency, will convene an Interagency Work Group immediately. The critical "Regulatory Gray Zone" is June 2025 through September 1, 2026, during which the "Data Governance Plan" will be written. This plan will define the technical standards your business must meet.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Contact Your Software Vendor: Ask your SIS or management software provider if they are aware of HB3963 and if they are preparing for the TEA/TWC data integration standards.
2.Audit Data Entry Protocols: Ensure your staff is collecting full legal names and dates of birth exactly as they appear on official documents to prevent errors during the state's data matching process.
3.Monitor the Work Group: Assign a compliance officer to track the "Interagency Data Governance Plan" due September 1, 2026. We must intervene if they propose technical requirements that are unfunded mandates for private providers.
4.Review Privacy Policies: Update your parent handbooks and privacy policies to disclose that data is shared with state agencies for longitudinal tracking, ensuring you are covered under consent clauses.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
State Vendor Contracts: If you provide IT, software, or consulting services to TEA, TWC, or HHSC, your contracts will be amended to require compliance with the new ECIDS architecture and stricter cybersecurity protocols (Sec. 10.002(b)(3)).
Provider Agreements: Childcare providers operating under TWC subsidies or Pre-K partnerships should anticipate amendments in the 2026 renewal cycle. These will likely include clauses requiring cooperation with data validation audits to ensure your reported data matches the new state standards.
Hiring/Training
Administrative Training: Your intake and administrative staff must be retrained on data entry standards once the agencies harmonize definitions. For example, how "attendance" and "family income" are defined may change to ensure consistency between TWC and TEA.
IT Coordination: No new hires are required, but you must designate a point of contact to work with your software vendors to ensure your systems can export data in the format the state will mandate.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Unique Identifiers (UIDs): The system relies on matching records across agencies. You will likely be required to collect and input specific UIDs (e.g., TSDS IDs) for all children and families in your care.
Data Hygiene: Audit your current data immediately. The state will aggregate data you have already submitted. If your historical reporting to TWC or TEA is inaccurate, it will skew the public perception of your facility's outcomes when the data is published.
Fees & Costs
Software Upgrades: There are no direct fees paid to the state. However, if your current software vendor charges for "custom reporting" or API integrations needed to connect to ECIDS, you will bear that cost.
Cyber Liability: Review your cyber insurance. While the state secures the central system, you are liable for the security of the data *before* it leaves your server.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The "Consumer Dashboard": Sec. 10.005(b)(3)(C) mandates a publicly available dashboard. The law does not specify the level of granularity.
*Risk:* If data is reported at the *provider level* rather than aggregated by county, your facility’s "outcomes" could be publicly compared against others without context.
"Business Use Cases": Sec. 10.005(c)(2) allows agencies to use this data for undefined "business use cases."
*Risk:* Agencies may use this integrated data to justify changes to reimbursement rates or grant eligibility based on "efficiency" metrics derived from the new system.
Appropriation Contingency: Implementation is contingent on the ~$5.8M funding noted in the Fiscal Note. If this specific line item was cut from the final General Appropriations Act, the timeline will freeze.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Texas' Early Childhood Education (ECE) system has immense value as a foundation for supporting families and employers, students' educational attainment, and the state's long-term prosperity. Yet this system is fragmented across multiple state agencies, each managing their own data systems for programs serving children from birth to age eight. Examples of these systems include child protective services under the Department of Family and Protective Services, public prekindergarten under the Texas Education Agency, and childcare services under the Texas Workforce Commission. The bill author has informed the committee that the siloed data across agencies and systems such as these increases cost, hampers transparency, and obscures necessary information for strategic decision-making and that fostering insights through cross-agency collaboration could enable more informed decisions that promote positive outcomes for young children, their families, and the state economy. C.S.H.B. 3963 seeks to address these issues by strengthening data sharing across agencies to better inform state-level policy and program improvement related to early childhood.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3963 amends the Education Code to require the early childhood interagency work group to initiate the development of the early childhood integrated data system for the purpose of facilitating the sharing of data from early childhood programs across state agencies to inform policy related to those programs at the state level and to guide improvements to those programs to provide better outcomes for children and families. The bill requires such a system to be developed in a manner that does the following:
·allows for the integration of existing state and federal data systems that are accessible to the cooperating entities and that contain data derived from early childhood services and programs;
·allows for the identification of and reporting on gaps in services, opportunities to align services and programs, coordination needs across services and programs, and specific outcome measures using aggregated data that does not contain any identifying information, to the extent state or federal law expressly authorizes that use of the information; and
·complies with state and federal laws relating to privacy, cybersecurity, and data collection, including rules establishing procedures to ensure that there is no unauthorized duplication or removal of confidential information.
The bill establishes that its provisions may not be construed to authorize the collection of data other than such data derived from early childhood services and programs. The bill defines "early childhood interagency work group" as the work group established to promote collaboration across state agencies serving families with young children and that consists of representatives from the following state agencies:
·Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS);
·Department of State Health Services (DSHS);
·Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC);
·Texas Education Agency (TEA); and
·Texas Workforce Commission (TWC).
C.S.H.B. 3963 requires TEA to do the following:
·oversee the completion of the system in a manner consistent with the requirements of the bill;
·implement and maintain the system with assistance from the work group;
·provide staff to operate the system;
·using system data, conduct data matching using a protocol approved by the cooperating entities; and
·oversee research related to the system in coordination with the cooperating entities.
The bill defines "cooperating entity" as the Children's Learning Institute at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, HHSC, TEA, and TWC. The bill requires TEA to undertake to ensure that the system is completed not later than January 1, 2027.
C.S.H.B. 3963 requires TEA and each cooperating entity to enter into a memorandum of understanding regarding the sharing of data for purposes of the system. The memorandum of understanding must specify the data derived from early childhood services and programs to be shared and the frequency and manner of that data sharing. The bill requires each cooperating entity to participate in the system and share data for purposes of the system as required by the memorandum.
C.S.H.B. 3963 requires TEA to submit to the governor and the legislature, not later than September 1 of each year, a report on the progress in developing, establishing, and operating the system. The bill requires the initial report to include the following components:
·an interagency data governance plan that includes objectives relevant to the system and a framework for achieving those objectives, the roles and responsibilities of all state entities involved in establishing and maintaining the system, and documentation of relevant state and federal privacy, cybersecurity, and data collection laws, including rules;
·a design plan that includes data integration, security, storage, retention, management, processing, and analytics and other products, as well as roles and responsibilities of relevant state entity personnel regarding data integration; and
·information on the status of the hiring of staff to operate the system, funding applied for and secured, and the development of a website that includes a preliminary, publicly available consumer data dashboard.
The bill requires each subsequent report to include the following:
·updates to the information required in the initial report;
·an overview on business use cases the system can support; and
·information on the development of analytic tools based on those business use cases.
C.S.H.B. 3963 authorizes the work group, the cooperating entities, and TEA to use any available state or federal money to develop the system. The bill requires TEA to actively pursue grants or other money available from the state and federal government to operate the system. The bill authorizes the work group, the cooperating entities, and TEA to accept gifts, grants, and donations from any source for the purposes of the bill's provisions.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3963 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
While the introduced amended the Human Resources Code to establish provisions relating to the early childhood integrated data system, the substitute amends the Education Code to establish those provisions. Additionally, whereas the introduced included DFPS and the Texas Head Start Collaboration Office in the definition of "cooperating entity," the substitute omits these entities from that definition. The substitute defines "lead agency" as TEA and omits provisions from the introduced requiring the early childhood interagency workgroup to designate from among certain cooperating entities a lead agency and defining the term as that designated entity.
The substitute and the introduced differ in the following ways regarding provisions relating to the initial development of the early childhood integrated data system:
·whereas the introduced required the workgroup to develop the system, the substitute requires the work group to initiate the development of the system;
·whereas the introduced set out the purpose of the system as facilitating and strengthening the sharing of data from early childhood programs, the substitute only sets out the purpose as facilitating such data sharing;
·whereas the introduced stated one of the goals of such data sharing to be guiding improvements for those programs that support the state's early childhood goals and priorities and provide better outcomes for children and families in Texas, the substitute changes the goal to guiding improvements to early childhood programs to provide better outcomes for children and families;
·the substitute changes the requirement present in the introduced that the system be developed in a manner that allows for the integration of existing state and federal data systems that are accessible to the cooperating agencies and that contain data derived from early childhood services and programs in the following ways:
oreplaces reference to "cooperating agencies" with reference to "cooperating entities";
oremoves the specification that the services and programs serve families with children from birth through eight years of age; and
oremoves the specification that such data includes data related to outcomes under those services and programs;
·the substitute omits the requirement present in the introduced for the system to be developed in a manner that allows for the identification of and reporting on gaps in underserved populations; and
·replaces the prohibition on data other than that described by the bill's applicable provisions from being collected for purposes of the system, as in the introduced, with a provision establishing that nothing in the bill's provisions may be construed to authorize the collection of data other than that specified data.
The introduced required the lead agency to complete the development of the system in a manner consistent with the requirements of the bill, whereas the substitute requires TEA to oversee the completion of the system in such a manner. The substitute includes a provision not in the introduced that requires TEA, in coordination with the cooperating entities, to oversee research projects related to the system.
Whereas the introduced required the workgroup to submit to the legislature, not later than January 1 of each year, a report on the workgroup's, lead agency's, and cooperating entities' progress in developing, establishing, and operating the system, the substitute requires TEA to submit to the governor and the legislature, not later than September 1 of each year, a report on the progress in developing, establishing, and operating the system. Both the introduced and substitute establish the components of the initial report, but the versions differ as follows:
·the substitute omits the provisions included in the introduced for those components to include an identification of the state entity the workgroup designated to act as the lead agency and a standardized process for updating the memorandum of understanding into which the cooperating entities entered;
·the introduced included among the report's components a design plan that focuses on data transportation, whereas the substitute changes this component to a design plan that includes data integration; and
·the introduced included as a component of the report information on the status of hiring project management full-time equivalents and grant funding applied for and grant funding secured, whereas the substitute changes this to information on the status of hiring staff to operate the system and funding applied for and secured.
The substitute includes an authorization not in the introduced for the work group, the cooperating entities, and TEA to accept gifts, grants, and donations from any source for the purposes of the bill's provisions. The substitute requires TEA to actively pursue grants or other money available from the state government, in addition to the federal government as in the introduced, to operate the system.
The substitute omits the following provisions present in the introduced:
·provisions that required the workgroup, not later than January 1, 2026, to designate the lead agency for the system and to submit the initial report to the applicable entities; and
·a provision that provided for the delayed implementation of any provision for which a state agency determined a federal waiver or authorization is necessary for implementation until the waiver or authorization was requested and granted.
The substitute includes a requirement not in the introduced for TEA to undertake to ensure that the early childhood integrated data system is completed not later than January 1, 2027.
Honorable Giovanni Capriglione, Chair, House Committee on Delivery of Government Efficiency
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB3963 by Capriglione (Relating to an early childhood integrated data system.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3963, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($5,880,848) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2026
($2,533,366)
2027
($3,347,482)
2028
($2,158,464)
2029
($2,158,464)
2030
($2,158,464)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1
Probable Savings/(Cost) from Federal Funds 555
Probable Savings/(Cost) from GR Match For Medicaid 758
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2025
2026
($2,060,272)
($485,298)
($473,094)
5.0
2027
($2,874,388)
($485,298)
($473,094)
5.0
2028
($1,685,370)
($485,298)
($473,094)
5.0
2029
($1,685,370)
($485,298)
($473,094)
5.0
2030
($1,685,370)
($485,298)
($473,094)
5.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would create an Early Childhood Interagency Work Group, consisting of multiple state entities identified by the bill, that would develop an Early Childhood Integrated Data System (ECIDS). This analysis assumes the Texas Education Agency (TEA) would function as the lead agency for the group and would maintain the ECIDS.
The bill would require an initial and subsequent annual reports to inform policy related the state's early childhood goals and priorities.
Methodology
TEA assumes an inital cost of $62,500 in fiscal year 2026 and a subsequent annual cost of $125,000 for reporting requirements.
The analysis assumes that TEA would require an additional 4.0 FTEs to implement provisions of the bill at a cost of $0.6 million annually.
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) estimates the need for 1.0 FTE at a cost of $0.2 million annually to develop an internal coordination integrated data system.
Technology
TEA assumes IT costs to implement the provisions of the bill would total $1.8 million for the 2026-27 biennium and $0.1 million in subsequent years.
HHSC estimates an annual All Funds cost of $1.8 million to implement IT provisions of the bill including development of an internal integrated data system and file sharing requirements and capabilities with the lead agency.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
320 Texas Workforce Commission, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of, 701 Texas Education Agency, 720 The University of Texas System Administration
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, RStu, ASA, SL, NV, LBl
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB3963 mandates the immediate creation of the Early Childhood Integrated Data System (ECIDS), a centralized infrastructure linking data from TEA, TWC, HHSC, and DFPS. While primarily an agency-level directive, this law will force downstream data standardization for all licensed childcare providers, Head Start programs, and Pre-K partnerships receiving state funding. Expect stricter data validation protocols and new software interoperability requirements to facilitate the state’s cross-agency tracking of child outcomes.
Q
Who authored HB3963?
HB3963 was authored by Texas Representative Giovanni Capriglione during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB3963 signed into law?
HB3963 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB3963?
HB3963 is enforced by Texas Education Agency (Lead Agency), Health and Human Services Commission, Texas Workforce Commission and Department of Family and Protective Services.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB3963?
The compliance urgency for HB3963 is rated as "low". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB3963?
The cost impact of HB3963 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB3963 address?
HB3963 addresses topics including education, education--primary & secondary, education--primary & secondary--general, electronic information systems and human services.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.