Relating to notaries public; creating a criminal offense; authorizing a fee.
CriticalImmediate action required
Medium Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Secretary of State • Local District and County Attorneys
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025 (Criminal penalties and retention rules apply immediately).
Compliance Deadline:
September 1, 2025: Immediate cessation of non-appearance notarizations to avoid criminal liability.
January 1, 2026: New education and application mandates apply to all appointments and reappointments submitted on or after this date.
Agency Rulemaking: The Secretary of State must adopt rules establishing course content and fees by January 1, 2026.
*Note:* A regulatory gap exists between Sept 1, 2025, and Jan 1, 2026, where criminal penalties are active, but the state-mandated education on these penalties will not yet be available.
Immediate Action Plan
Audit Notary Roster: Identify all employees holding a commission and map their expiration dates.
Issue Policy Memo: Distribute a directive immediately stating that notarizing without the signer's physical presence (or compliant RON connection) is prohibited and constitutes a criminal offense.
Update Offboarding: Revise exit interviews to address the location and storage of the departing employee's notary journal.
Verify RON Tools: Ensure IT has vetted all remote notarization platforms for statutory compliance.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Employment Agreements: Update job descriptions for administrative staff holding commissions. Explicitly state that adherence to Texas Government Code regarding personal appearance is a condition of employment to mitigate vicarious liability.
Third-Party Vendors: Mobile notary and signing agent contracts must be amended to require certification of compliance with the new 10-year record retention mandate.
Hiring/Training
Mandatory Education: You must allocate paid work hours for renewing notaries to complete the SOS-administered course (capped at 2 hours).
Internal Training: Immediately train staff that "leaving a document on the desk to be stamped later" is now a crime. Verify that any Remote Online Notarization (RON) software used meets Section 406.104 standards; standard video conferencing (Zoom/Teams) without identity proofing does not satisfy the "personal appearance" requirement.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
10-Year Retention: Update document retention policies to preserve notary journals for 10 years from the date of the act.
Custody Protocols: Establish a clear protocol for the physical custody of journals when a notary employee terminates employment. While the journal belongs to the notary, the business relies on the record to defend contract validity.
Fees & Costs
New Course Fees: Budget for a new, undefined "reasonable fee" for the SOS education course starting in 2026.
Insurance Review: Consult your broker immediately. Standard Errors & Omissions (E&O) policies typically exclude criminal acts. If an employee is charged with a felony for improper notarization, your current policy likely will not cover their defense.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Reasonable Fee": The legislature did not cap the fee for the mandatory course; the SOS will determine this amount during rulemaking.
Course Exclusivity: The SOS is the sole provider of the required education. There is no alternative if the state's portal experiences technical failures, potentially creating bottlenecks for renewals in Q1 2026.
"Good Cause" for Revocation: While the law adds failure to maintain records as "good cause" for revocation, the specific audit procedures the SOS will use to verify the 10-year retention remain undefined.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Deed theft occurs when a person takes the title to a home without the homeowner's knowledge or consent. Usually, the signatures of the true owners are forged to either "sell" the property to unknowing buyers or borrow against the property from unknowing lenders. Often, the true owners do not discover that a fraudulent deed or lien has been filed until they go to sell or refinance their property.
To produce a document that appears to be valid, the bad actor either conspires with a notary, tricks a notary with a fake ID, or fraudulently reproduces the seal and signature of a notary.
S.B. 693 will deter deed theft from occurring by creating a criminal offense for the use of a valid or fraudulent notary signature on a fraudulent document. The bill would create a Class A misdemeanor for knowingly affixing a valid or fraudulent notary seal to a document that is presumed to be fraudulent under Section 51.901(c)(2) of the Government Code and filing or attempting to file that document. A document is presumed to be fraudulent when it purports to create a lien or assert a claim against real property and is a document that is not provided for by the Constitution or state or federal laws and is not created by consent of the obligor, debtor, or owner of the property or is not a lien imposed by a court.
As proposed, S.B. 693 amends current law relating to creating a criminal offense for the use of a notary seal or counterfeit seal on a fraudulent document or instrument.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Subchapter A, Chapter 406, Government Code, by adding Section 406.027, as follows:
Sec. 406.027. USE OF NOTARY SEAL OR COUNTERFEIT SEAL ON FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT OR INSTRUMENT; CRIMINAL OFFENSE. (a) Defines "counterfeit seal."
(b) Provides that a person commits an offense if the person knowingly affixes a notary seal or counterfeit seal to a document or instrument presumed to be fraudulent under Section 51.901(c)(2) (relating to the circumstance in which a document or instrument is presumed to be fraudulent) and files, records, or attempts to file or record the document or instrument with a clerk of the supreme court, clerk of the court of criminal appeals, clerk of a court of appeals, district clerk, county clerk, district and county clerk, or municipal clerk.
(c) Provides that an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
(d) Authorizes the actor, if conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under any other law, to be prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both.
Honorable Pete Flores, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB693 by West (Relating to creating a criminal offense for the use of a notary seal or counterfeit seal on a fraudulent document or instrument.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would create a Class A misdemeanor offense for knowingly affixing a notary seal or counterfeit seal to a document or instrument presumed to be fraudulent and then filing, recording, or attempting to file or record the document or instrument with certain clerks.
It is assumed that any impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources would not be significant.
Local Government Impact
It is assumed that any fiscal impact to units of local government associated with enforcement, prosecution, supervision, or confinement would not be significant.
Source Agencies: b > td >
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 307 Secretary of State
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, MGol, DGI
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB693 fundamentally alters the liability landscape for Texas businesses by elevating "convenience notarization"—notarizing without the signer present—from a procedural error to a criminal offense, punishable as a State Jail Felony for real estate documents. Effective September 1, 2025, the law also mandates a strict 10-year record retention period and establishes the Secretary of State (SOS) as the exclusive provider of mandatory notary education. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 (Criminal penalties and retention rules apply immediately).
Q
Who authored SB693?
SB693 was authored by Texas Senator Royce West during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB693 signed into law?
SB693 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 30, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB693?
SB693 is enforced by Texas Secretary of State and Local District and County Attorneys.
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB693?
The compliance urgency for SB693 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB693?
The cost impact of SB693 is estimated as "medium". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB693 address?
SB693 addresses topics including crimes, crimes--miscellaneous, notaries, continuing education and secretary of state.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.