Relating to status of certain documents or instruments purporting to convey title to or an interest in real property.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Texas District Courts • County Clerks • District Clerks
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025
Compliance Deadline:August 1, 2025 (Internal readiness for mail processing and template creation is required prior to the effective date).
Agency Rulemaking: No agency rulemaking required. However, District and County Clerks must update fee schedules to zero-out costs for these specific filings by the effective date.
Immediate Action Plan
Update Legal Templates: Incorporate statutory language from Gov't Code § 51.9035(b) and Property Code § 5.0206(e) into your document management system immediately.
Audit Mail Procedures: Establish a "Red Flag" protocol for incoming Certified Mail to ensure the 120-day objection window is never missed.
Review Portfolios: Identify assets currently encumbered by fraudulent liens and prepare Affidavits for filing on September 1, 2025.
Revise Underwriting: Title companies must update guidelines to accept the "Judicial Finding of Fact" as conclusive evidence of clear title.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Purchase & Sale Agreements (PSAs): Amend PSAs to include a 150-day cure period (120-day statutory wait + 30 days judicial processing) for title defects resolved via this statute.
Vendor Agreements: Update scopes of work for third-party lien monitoring services. They must flag "Owner’s Affidavits" filed under Property Code § 5.0206 immediately.
Hiring/Training
Mailroom Protocols: Train intake staff to prioritize Certified Mail referencing "Property Code § 5.0206" or "Fraudulent Lien." Failure to route these notices to Legal within the 120-day window can result in the extinguishment of a valid lien.
Legal Staff: Counsel must be trained on the new *ex parte* petition workflow to avoid unnecessary litigation costs for clear-cut fraud cases.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Mandatory Forms: Adopt the specific statutory forms for the "Owner’s Affidavit," "Petition," and "Finding of Fact" defined in the statute. Generic pleadings will be rejected.
Proof of Mailing: You must retain physical return receipts (green cards) or electronic delivery confirmations indefinitely. These are evidentiary prerequisites for obtaining the judicial order.
Fees & Costs
Fee Prohibitions: The law prohibits the District Clerk from charging a filing fee for the Petition and the County Clerk from charging a recording fee for the Judge's Order.
Budget Impact: Positive. This reduces legal spend on quiet title actions significantly.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The "Controverting Affidavit" Block: The statute does not require a counter-filing to be proven *true*, only *filed*. If a fraudster (or their proxy) files a Controverting Affidavit within the 120-day window, the expedited process is halted, and you must revert to traditional litigation.
Judicial Unfamiliarity: District Judges may initially resist signing orders *ex parte* (without a hearing). Counsel must be prepared to brief the court on their specific authority under Gov't Code § 51.9035 to rule based solely on the documents.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Vital documents related to real property, such as deeds and mortgages, are recorded in the county clerk's office in the county where the property is located. Filing these vital documents for recording provides public notice of ownership while also offering protection against fraud and title disputes.
However, when fraudulent documents are filed for recording, such protection no longer exists. In fact, when a fraudulent deed is recorded, it can be used sell the property to unknowing buyers or to borrow against the property from unknowing lenders.
Often, the true owners do not discover that a fraudulent deed or lien has been filed until they go to sell or refinance their property.
S.B. 1734 protects Texas homeowners by creating a procedure for homeowners to challenge the validity of a recorded document that purports to convey title when they have reason to believe it is fraudulent.
To challenge the validity of a recorded document, a homeowner must complete a two-step process.
First, if a homeowner has reason to believe that a recorded document is fraudulent, the homeowner must file an affidavit asserting the document is fraudulent with the county. During this period, the purported grantor and grantee have the ability to file an affidavit asserting that the document is valid.
If the purported grantor or grantee does not respond, the homeowner may file a motion challenging the validity of the recorded document with the district clerk of the county.
Once a motion is filed with the district clerk, a district judge has the ability to determine the validity of the document.
S.B. 1734 ensures that Texas homeowners will have a clear and inexpensive route to justice when deed theft occurs.
As proposed, S.B. 1734 amends current law relating to status of certain documents or instruments purporting to convey title to or an interest in real property.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Section 51.901(c), Government Code, as follows:
(c) Provides that a document or instrument, for purposes of Section 51.901 (Fraudulent Document or Instrument), is presumed to be fraudulent if it meets certain criteria, including if the document or instrument purports to convey title to or an interest in real property and a person has been convicted of an offense under Title 7 (Offenses Against Property) or Title 8 (Offenses Against Public Administration), Penal Code, for conduct with respect to the document or instrument or the document or instrument is the subject of an owner's affidavit and certificate of mailing filed and recorded in accordance with Section 5.0206, Property Code, and a controverting affidavit was not timely filed for recording under that section. Makes nonsubstantive changes.
SECTION 2. Amends Subchapter J, Chapter 51, Government Code, by adding Section 51.9035, as follows:
Sec. 51.9035. ACTION ON FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE. (a) Authorizes an owner of real property who has reason to believe that a document or instrument purporting to convey title to or an interest in the real property and recorded in the real property records is fraudulent, subject to Section 5.0206(c), Property Code, to complete and file with the district clerk of the county in which the document or instrument is recorded a motion, verified as required by Subsection (c), to which the movant has attached:
(1) a copy of the document or instrument; and
(2) documentary evidence of a person's conviction of an offense under Title 7 or Title 8, Penal Code, for conduct with respect to the document or instrument or the filing and recording of an uncontroverted owner's affidavit and certificate of mailing under Section 5.0206, Property Code.
(b) Requires that a motion under Subsection (a) contain, at a minimum, the information in a certain suggested form. Sets forth the required language of the form.
(c) Requires that a motion filed under Subsection (a) be verified by the affidavit in substantially a certain form. Sets forth the required language of the form.
(d) Authorizes a motion under this section to be ruled on by a district judge having jurisdiction over real property matters in the county where the document or instrument described in the motion is recorded. Authorizes the district court to rule on the motion based solely on a review of the attached document or instrument, the attached documentary evidence, and any relevant public records without hearing any testimonial evidence. Authorizes the court's review to be made ex parte without delay or notice of any kind. Requires an appellate court to expedite review of a court's finding under this section.
(e) Prohibits the district clerk from collecting a filing fee for filing a motion under this section.
(f) Requires the district judge, after reviewing the attached document or instrument, the attached evidence, and any relevant public records under this section, to enter an appropriate finding of fact and conclusion of law, which is required to be filed for recording and indexed in the same class of records in which the subject document or instrument was originally recorded. Requires that a copy of the finding of fact and conclusion of law be sent, by first class mail, to the movant and to the person who filed the document or instrument for recording at the last known address of each person within seven days after the date that the finding of fact and conclusion of law is issued by the judge.
(g) Prohibits the county clerk from collecting a fee for filing a district judge's finding of fact and conclusion of law under this section.
(h) Sets forth the language of a suggested form for a district court's finding of fact and conclusion of law under Subsection (f).
SECTION 3. Amends Subchapter A, Chapter 5, Property Code, by adding Sections 5.0206 and 5.0207, as follows:
Sec. 5.0206. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT REGARDING PURPORTED CONVEYANCE OF TITLE OR INTEREST. (a) Authorizes an owner of real property to file for recording in the real property records of the county in which a document or instrument purporting to convey title to or an interest in the real property was recorded an affidavit that substantially complies with Subsection (e) and a certificate of mailing that substantially complies with Subsection (f).
(b) Requires a property owner who files an affidavit under Subsection (a) to send a copy of the filed affidavit and a letter notifying the grantor and grantee of the purported conveyance of the filing of the affidavit by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the grantor and grantee's last known addresses.
(c) Authorizes the property owner that filed an affidavit, if an affidavit and certificate of mailing are filed and recorded under Subsection (a) and a controverting affidavit is not filed for recording in the time provided by Subsection (d), to bring a motion for a district court ruling under Section 51.9035, Government Code.
(d) Authorizes the grantor or grantee of the purported conveyance, not later than the 120th day after the date a certificate of mailing was filed under Subsection (a), to file for recording a controverting affidavit in the real property records of the county in which the real property is located asserting that the affidavit or certificate of mailing filed by the property owner under Subsection (a) is untrue or another reason exists as to why the conveyance is valid.
(e) Requires that an affidavit filed under Subsection (a) be in substantially a certain form. Sets forth the required language of the form.
(f) Requires that a certificate of mailing filed under Subsection (a) be in substantially a certain form. Sets forth the required language of the form.
Sec. 5.0207. EFFECT OF CERTAIN COURT FINDINGS ON PURPORTED CONVEYANCE OF TITLE OR INTEREST. Authorizes a bona fide purchaser or a mortgagee for value or a successor or assign of a bona fide purchaser or mortgagee for value to rely conclusively on a determination in a district court's finding of fact and conclusion of law recorded under Section 51.9035, Government Code, that a document or instrument does not convey title to or an interest in the real property described in the document or instrument.
Honorable Bryan Hughes, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB1734 by West (Relating to status of certain documents or instruments purporting to convey title to or an interest in real property.), As Introduced
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to lack of case-level data.
The bill would create a new filing mechanism for an owner of real property to challenge certain fraudulent conveyances of real property and would prohibit district clerks from collecting a filing fee connected to the motion for action on a fraudulent conveyance.
The Office of Court Administration indicates that any fiscal impact on the state court system cannot be determined due to lack of case-level data.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, KDw, DA, NTh
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB1734 establishes a streamlined, fee-exempt judicial process to expunge fraudulent real property filings (deeds and liens) effective September 1, 2025. This legislation allows property owners to bypass expensive quiet title lawsuits in favor of an expedited ex parte review, but it imposes strict monitoring requirements on lenders and lienholders to prevent the inadvertent invalidation of legitimate interests via default. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 Compliance Deadline: August 1, 2025 (Internal readiness for mail processing and template creation is required prior to the effective date).
Q
Who authored SB1734?
SB1734 was authored by Texas Senator Royce West during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB1734 signed into law?
SB1734 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 30, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB1734?
SB1734 is enforced by Texas District Courts, County Clerks and District Clerks.
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB1734?
The compliance urgency for SB1734 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB1734?
The cost impact of SB1734 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB1734 address?
SB1734 addresses topics including property interests, property interests--real property, fraud, county government and county government--employees/officers.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.