Relating to the accreditation of certain postsecondary educational institutions in this state or of certain programs offered by those institutions.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025
Compliance Deadline: Immediate upon effective date for institutions submitting new degree program applications; ongoing for accreditation renewal cycles.
Agency Rulemaking:High Priority. The THECB must formally define and publish the list of "recognized accrediting agencies." Until this rulemaking is finalized (expected Q4 2025 – Q1 2026), institutions exist in a regulatory gray zone regarding which agencies satisfy state requirements.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Conduct a "Ctrl+F" Audit: Immediately search all active bond covenants, student handbooks, and articulation agreements for the term "SACS" and flag for legal review.
2.Freeze Accreditation Changes: Do not initiate a switch to a new accreditor until THECB publishes its final list of recognized agencies.
3.Update Board Liability Insurance: Verify that D&O insurance policies cover Regents/Trustees for decisions related to accreditation changes, specifically regarding potential loss of federal funding.
4.Revise Junior College Proposals: If you are a Junior College currently drafting a baccalaureate proposal, rewrite the accreditation section to reference "THECB-recognized agencies" rather than SACS specifically.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Critical Audit Required: You must review three specific contract types for explicit references to "SACS" or "Southern Association of Colleges and Schools":
1.Bond Indentures & Loan Agreements: Many financing covenants define an "Event of Default" as a loss of SACS accreditation. These must be amended to reference "THECB-recognized accreditation."
2.Articulation & Transfer Agreements: Contracts with partner institutions often condition credit acceptance on SACS accreditation. These require renegotiation to ensure credits remain transferable if accreditors change.
3.Vendor/TPM Agreements: Third-party program manager contracts often tie performance metrics to SACS standards.
Hiring/Training
Faculty Credentialing: If your institution transitions to a new accreditor, Human Resources must overhaul faculty qualification standards. SACS guidelines for instructor credentials differ from other regional or national agencies; ensure your Faculty Handbook aligns with the *current* accreditor's standards to avoid audit findings.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Junior College Baccalaureate Plans: Under amended Section 130.307(c), public junior colleges seeking authorization for baccalaureate programs must now submit a long-term financial plan specifically addressing accreditation acquisition from a THECB-recognized agency.
Due Diligence Files: Boards of Regents must maintain administrative records justifying any decision to switch accreditors, including cost-benefit analyses and alignment with federal Title IV (financial aid) requirements.
Fees & Costs
Transition Costs: While the legislative fiscal note indicates "no significant fiscal implication to the State," the cost to *institutions* to switch accreditors is substantial. Budget for application fees, site visit travel costs, and internal staff hours for self-studies if a switch is pursued.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
Federal vs. State Conflict: The law requires THECB to identify recognized agencies. If THECB recognizes an agency that the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) does not fully recognize for Title IV purposes, institutions could jeopardize access to Pell Grants and federal student loans. Monitor THECB rulemaking to ensure total alignment with USDOE lists.
"Compelling Academic Reason": The bill allows institutions to exceed credit hour caps for a "compelling academic reason." As this standard was previously interpreted through SACS precedents, THECB must now clarify if this definition will change or remain standardized across different accreditors.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
In 2019, the U.S. Department of Education amended federal rules to no longer require institutions of higher education to use their regional accreditor. Instead, colleges and universities are allowed to be accredited by any nationally recognized accreditor. However, there are parts of code that still require a Texas institutions of higher education to be accredited by their regional accreditor, the Southern Association of College and Schools (SACS). This legislation removes the statutory requirements for institutions of higher education to be accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
As proposed, S.B. 530 amends current law relating to the accreditation of certain postsecondary educational institutions in this state or of certain programs offered by those institutions.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION 2. Amends Section 61.0515(a), Education Code, as follows:
(a) Prohibits a student, to earn a baccalaureate degree, from being required by a general academic teaching institution to complete more than the minimum number of semester credit hours required for the degree by the institution's recognized accrediting agency, rather than the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools or its successor, unless the institution determines that there is a compelling academic reason for requiring completion of additional semester credit hours for the degree.
SECTION 3. Amends Section 61.05151(a), Education Code, to make a conforming change.
SECTION 4. Amends Section 61.8235(f), Education Code, to make a conforming change.
SECTION 5. Amends Section 107.151(c), Education Code, to make a conforming change.
SECTION 6. Amends Section 107.201(c), Education Code, to make a conforming change.
SECTION 7. Amends Section 130.301, Education Code, by adding Subdivision (3) to define "recognized accrediting agency."
SECTION 8. Amends Section 130.305, Education Code, to make a conforming change.
SECTION 9. Amends Section 130.307(c), Education Code, to make a conforming change.
Honorable Brandon Creighton, Chair, Senate Committee on Education K-16
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB530 by Sparks (Relating to the accreditation of certain postsecondary educational institutions in this state or of certain programs offered by those institutions.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 717 Texas Southern University, 719 Texas State Technical College System Administration, 720 The University of Texas System Administration, 758 Texas State University System, 768 Texas Tech University System Administration, 769 University of North Texas System Administration, 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board, 783 University of Houston System Administration, 966 Howard College, 978 San Jacinto College
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, FV, GO, LBO
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB530 removes the statutory mandate requiring Texas public institutions to be accredited specifically by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), transferring authority to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) to designate "recognized accrediting agencies. " This legislation compels all public universities and junior colleges to audit bond covenants and transfer agreements that explicitly reference SACS to avoid technical default or loss of credit transferability. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 Compliance Deadline: Immediate upon effective date for institutions submitting new degree program applications; ongoing for accreditation renewal cycles.
Q
Who authored SB530?
SB530 was authored by Texas Senator Kevin Sparks during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB530 signed into law?
SB530 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB530?
SB530 is enforced by Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB).
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB530?
The compliance urgency for SB530 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB530?
The cost impact of SB530 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB530 address?
SB530 addresses topics including education, education--higher, education--higher--institutions & programs, education--junior college districts and higher education coordinating board, texas.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.