Relating to the contract requirements for a contract between a single source continuum contractor and the Department of Family and Protective Services.
CriticalImmediate action required
High Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025
Compliance Deadline: Immediate upon the execution of any contract entered into, amended, modified, renewed, or extended on or after September 1, 2025.
Agency Rulemaking: While no statutory deadline for rulemaking exists, DFPS is expected to update internal policy manuals to operationalize "case reclamation" protocols. Watch for contract amendments rather than public rulemaking.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Audit Subcontracts: Review all downstream provider agreements to ensure they mirror the new statutory liability for court order compliance.
2.Negotiate Cure Periods: In upcoming contract discussions, aggressively negotiate for a defined "cure period" or dispute resolution process before DFPS can exercise "sole discretion" to reclaim cases.
3.Stress-Test Data Transfer: Conduct a "Reclamation Drill" to ensure your IT systems can transfer case authority back to DFPS within 24-48 hours to mitigate damages.
4.Establish Intake Protocol: Create a rapid-response workflow for court orders to ensure they are operationalized immediately upon receipt.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Master Services Agreement (MSA): Expect DFPS to insert non-negotiable language regarding "sole discretion" transfers and court order compliance in your next renewal or amendment.
Subcontracts: You must immediately amend agreements with Child Placing Agencies (CPAs) and network providers. Flow-down clauses are mandatory: if a subcontractor ignores a court order, it puts the SSCC in breach. Strengthen indemnification clauses to protect the SSCC from subcontractor non-compliance.
Hiring/Training
Judicial Compliance Officer: Designate a specific role responsible for the immediate intake, interpretation, and dissemination of court orders.
Staff Training: Case managers must be trained that a court order supersedes standard DFPS policy or internal SOPs. Non-compliance is no longer just a legal issue; it is a contract retention issue.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Judicial Order Log: Implement a centralized tracking system for every court order received. You must document the date received, the specific requirement, and the operational action taken. This log will be your primary defense against breach of contract allegations.
Transfer Readiness: Maintain case files in "audit-ready" status to facilitate immediate transfer back to DFPS or a competitor if the state exercises its reclamation authority.
Fees & Costs
Revenue Volatility: Financial forecasting must account for the risk of sudden partial or total contract loss without a standard cure period.
Insurance: Review Errors & Omissions (E&O) policies. Ensure coverage extends to liabilities arising from "contractual reclamation" or alleged failure to comply with judicial mandates.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Sole Discretion": The statute does not define the performance metrics or thresholds that trigger DFPS's right to reclaim cases. This lacks due process protections. There is currently no statutory requirement for a "Notice and Cure" period before the Department removes revenue-generating cases.
"Orders Imposing a Requirement on the Department": This language is dangerously broad. It implies that systemic court mandates against DFPS (e.g., federal class-action remedies) automatically flow down to the SSCC. It is unclear if DFPS will provide additional funding to meet these systemic judicial requirements.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
There are concerns the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) cannot reclaim case management functions in part or whole from a single source continuum contractor (SSCC) after the case management function has been transitioned to the SSCC, unless there is a full contract turnover or termination, either on the part of the SSCC or DFPS. This is intended to ensure continuous quality of care and service provision to children and families. However, there is a need for DFPS to respond to and expeditiously address concerns with case management performance without a full contract turnover being initiated.
S.B. 1589 amends language in the Texas Family Code allowing DFPS to assume case management responsibilities of a SSCC, in part or incrementally, as opposed to full contract termination, if consistent issues are present.
As proposed, S.B. 1589 amends current law relating to the contract requirements for a contract between a single source continuum contractor and the Department of Family and Protective Services.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Section 264.155(a), Family Code, as follows:
(a) Requires that a contract with a single source continuum contractor to provide community-based care services in a catchment area include certain provisions, including provisions that allow the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), at DFPS's sole discretion, to reclaim the case management authority over any or all of the cases in a catchment area from the single source continuum contractor or transfer the case management authority over any or all of the cases in a catchment area from the single source continuum contractor to another single source continuum contractor. Makes nonsubstantive changes.
SECTION 2. Makes application of this Act prospective.
Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB1589 by Hancock (Relating to the contract requirements for a contract between a single source continuum contractor and the Department of Family and Protective Services.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would allow the Department of Family and Protective Services to reclaim case management authority from the single source continuum contractor or transfer the authority to another single source continuum contractor.
It is assumed any costs to the Department of Family and Protective Services could be absorbed within existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, NPe, ER, AN
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB 1589 fundamentally alters the risk profile for Community-Based Care (CBC) by granting the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) unilateral "sole discretion" to reclaim case management authority from Single Source Continuum Contractors (SSCCs). Furthermore, it codifies judicial orders regarding children or departmental requirements as strict contractual obligations, meaning a failure to follow a court order is now a material breach of your Master Services Agreement. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 Compliance Deadline: Immediate upon the execution of any contract entered into, amended, modified, renewed, or extended on or after September 1, 2025.
Q
Who authored SB1589?
SB1589 was authored by Texas Senator Kelly Hancock during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB1589 signed into law?
SB1589 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB1589?
SB1589 is enforced by Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS).
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB1589?
The compliance urgency for SB1589 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB1589?
The cost impact of SB1589 is estimated as "high". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB1589 address?
SB1589 addresses topics including family, family--child protection, family & protective services, department of and contractors & subcontractors.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.