Relating to the availability of certain personal information of a member of the governing board of an institution of higher education, the chief executive officer of the institution, or the chief executive officer of a university system.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Office of the Attorney General (Open Records Division) • County Appraisal Districts • Public Institutions of Higher Education (Public Information Officers)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025
Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025. All public information requests received on or after this date must adhere to the new redaction standards. There is no phase-in period.
Agency Rulemaking: No formal rulemaking is required. However, the Texas Comptroller is expected to update Form 50-284 (Request for Confidentiality) to explicitly list these new eligible categories before the effective date.
Immediate Action Plan
Identify the Roster: Immediately generate a list of all current Regents, Trustees, Chancellors, and Presidents/CEOs.
Distribute Forms: Provide Comptroller Form 50-284 and the PIA Election Form to these individuals; set an internal deadline of August 15, 2025, for return/filing.
Update Manuals: Revise the institution's Public Information Act manual to include these roles in the "Mandatory Redaction" category.
Audit Directories: Review public-facing online directories and remove home addresses or personal cell phone numbers of affected leadership prior to September 1.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Vendor Agreements: Review contracts with third-party vendors managing payroll, benefits, or directory services. Ensure their systems are capable of suppressing data for specific high-profile individuals to prevent accidental publication.
Executive Employment Agreements: Update contract templates for new Presidents and Chancellors to include a clause acknowledging the institution’s statutory obligation to secure their personal data under SB1569.
Hiring/Training
PIO Retraining: Public Information Officers must update "mandatory redaction" checklists. Staff must be trained to recognize that Regents and Trustees are now protected classes under the PIA, similar to peace officers.
HRIS Configuration: HR Information Systems must be updated to "flag" these specific roles. This prevents automated data dumps or directory generators from releasing protected contact information.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Tax Code Exemption (Form 50-284): Executives and board members must affirmatively complete the *Request for Confidentiality of Home Address* and submit it to their local County Appraisal District to scrub their home address from property tax rolls.
PIA Election Form: Public university officials should sign a standard Gov’t Code § 552.024 election form stating they do not wish to allow public access to their personal information. This serves as the operational trigger for HR to withhold data.
External Agency Notice: Private university leaders must provide documentation (Gov’t Code § 552.1175) to external government bodies (e.g., city permitting offices) if they wish to shield their data held by those entities.
Fees & Costs
No New Fees: There are no state fees associated with this compliance.
Operational Costs: Costs are limited to administrative time for form processing, system configuration, and potential legal review of "governing board" rosters.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
Definition of "Governing Board": The law cites Education Code 61.003. While this clearly covers Boards of Regents and Trustees, it likely *excludes* advisory boards or university foundation boards. Legal counsel must strictly interpret the "governing" scope to avoid over-redaction, which can lead to Attorney General challenges.
Private Institution Verification: While private university leaders are protected, they lack a standardized state ID to prove their status to external agencies (like a Tax Assessor). Private institutions should prepare a standardized "Verification of Employment/Position" letter for their leadership to attach to confidentiality requests filed with other government bodies.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
After recent controversies on university campuses, members of the governing boards of higher education institutions have had their private information shared on social media websites. Consequently, dozens of protestors showed up outside the residence of at least one university president on numerous occasions in the spring of 2024 chanting with megaphones, hitting pots and pans on the sidewalk and street, and even trespassing onto private property.
Legislation is needed to prevent the public sharing of Texas university officials' home addresses and to ensure the safety and security of these officials and their families.
S.B. 1569 expands the list of individuals whose personal information is exempt from public records requests to include:
(1) members of governing boards of institutions of higher education;
(2) chancellors and chief executive officers of university systems; and
(3) presidents and chief executive officers of public and private universities. Personal information includes the individual's home address, phone number, emergency contact information, Social Security number, and family member details.
S.B. 1569 protects higher education leaders from harassment and threats by extending them the same protections that are already offered to law enforcement officers, judges, and other public officials.
As proposed, S.B. 1569 amends current law relating to the availability of certain personal information of a member of the governing board of an institution of higher education, the chief executive officer of the institution, or the chief executive officer of a university system.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Section 552.117(a), Government Code, as follows:
(a) Provides that information is excepted from the requirements of Section 552.021 (Availability of Public Information) if it is information that relates to the home address, home telephone number, emergency contact information, or social security number of the following person or that reveals whether the person has family members:
(1)-(17) makes no changes to these subdivisions;
(18)-(19) makes nonsubstantive changes to these subdivisions;
(20) a member of the governing board of an institution of higher education or a private or independent institution of higher education, as those terms are defined by Section 61.003 (Definitions), Education Code;
(21) the chancellor or other chief executive officer of a university system, as defined by Section 61.003, Education Code; or
(22) the president or other chief executive officer of an institution of higher education or a private or independent institution of higher education, as those terms are defined by Section 61.003, Education Code.
SECTION 2. Amends Section 552.1175(a), Government Code, as follows:
(a) Provides that Section 552.1175 (Exception: Confidentiality of Certain Personal Identifying Information of Peace Officers and Other Officials Performing Sensitive Governmental Functions) applies only to:
(1)-(17) makes no changes to these subdivisions;
(18)-(19) makes nonsubstantive changes to these subdivisions;
(20) member of the governing board of an institution of higher education or a private or independent institution of higher education, as those terms are defined by Section 61.003, Education Code;
(21) the chancellor or other chief executive officer of a university system, as defined by Section 61.003, Education Code; and
(22) the president or other chief executive officer of an institution of higher education or a private or independent institution of higher education, as those terms are defined by Section 61.003, Education Code.
SECTION 3. Reenacts and amends Section 25.025(a), Tax Code, by amending Chapters 76 (S.B. 617), 152 (S.B. 870), 430 (H.B. 1911), 765 (H.B. 4504), and 937 (S.B. 1525), Acts of the 88th Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, as follows:
(a) Provides that Section 25.025 (Confidentiality of Certain Home Address Information) applies only to:
(1)-(26) makes no changes to these subdivisions;
(27)-(29) makes nonsubstantive changes to these subdivisions;
(30) a member of the governing board of an institution of higher education or a private or independent institution of higher education, as those terms are defined by Section 61.003, Education Code;
(31) the chancellor or other chief executive officer of a university system, as defined by Section 61.003, Education Code; and
(32) the president or other chief executive officer of an institution of higher education or a private or independent institution of higher education, as those terms are defined by Section 61.003, Education Code.
Deletes text of existing Subdivision (27) providing that this section applies to a current or former attorney for the Department of Family and Protective Services.
SECTION 4. Provides that, to the extent of any conflict, this Act prevails over another Act of the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, relating to nonsubstantive additions to and corrections in enacted codes.
SECTION 5. Makes application of this Act prospective.
Honorable Charles Schwertner, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB1569 by King (Relating to the availability of certain personal information of a member of the governing board of an institution of higher education, the chief executive officer of the institution, or the chief executive officer of a university system.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
302 Office of the Attorney General, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 717 Texas Southern University, 719 Texas State Technical College System Administration, 720 The University of Texas System Administration, 758 Texas State University System, 768 Texas Tech University System Administration, 769 University of North Texas System Administration, 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board, 783 University of Houston System Administration, 966 Howard College, 978 San Jacinto College
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, RStu, LBO, GO
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB1569 mandates strict confidentiality for the home addresses, telephone numbers, and family information of higher education governing board members, Chancellors, and Presidents, effective September 1, 2025. This legislation expands Public Information Act (PIA) exceptions and Tax Code protections, requiring immediate updates to redaction protocols and HR data management systems for both public and private institutions. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025.
Q
Who authored SB1569?
SB1569 was authored by Texas Senator Phil King during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB1569 signed into law?
SB1569 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 24, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB1569?
SB1569 is enforced by Office of the Attorney General (Open Records Division), County Appraisal Districts and Public Institutions of Higher Education (Public Information Officers).
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB1569?
The compliance urgency for SB1569 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB1569?
The cost impact of SB1569 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB1569 address?
SB1569 addresses topics including education, education--higher, education--higher--faculty, education--higher--institutions & programs and education--higher--private schools.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.