Relating to civil asset forfeiture of digital currency or other similar property.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Law Enforcement Agencies (Peace Officers) • Attorneys representing the State (District Attorneys) • Texas District Courts
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025
Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025 (Applies to all seizures initiated on or after this date).
Agency Rulemaking: No specific rulemaking is mandated by the statute, creating a regulatory gray zone regarding the technical standards for law enforcement wallets. We anticipate guidance from the Attorney General or industry best practices to emerge regarding "secure wallet" verification prior to Q3 2025.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Legal Review: Draft TOS amendments regarding seizure indemnification and yield cessation; deploy to users by July 1, 2025.
2.Technical Workflow: Establish a secure, out-of-band method for LEAs to provide destination wallet addresses. Never accept a wallet address via unverified email.
3.Insurance Audit: Review Cyber/Crime policies to ensure "compliance with invalid legal process" or "fraudulent instruction" is covered, specifically regarding irreversible crypto transfers.
4.Gas Fee Policy: Establish a hard policy on who pays the network transfer fees and communicate this to local District Attorneys' offices.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Terms of Service (TOS) & User Agreements: You must amend customer agreements immediately to include:
Seizure Protocol: Explicit notice that assets subject to a valid warrant will be transferred to government custody.
Cessation of Yield: A clause stating that staking rewards, interest, or yield generation ceases immediately upon seizure transfer.
Indemnification: Language protecting your institution from liability regarding market volatility or depreciation while the asset is in State custody.
Hiring/Training
Compliance & Fraud Teams:
Staff must be trained to distinguish between a standard "freeze order" and an SB1498 "transfer warrant."
Implement training on verifying destination wallet addresses provided by Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) to prevent irreversible transfers to fraudulent addresses (social engineering risks).
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Valuation Snapshots:
Because the law defines "proceeds" to include market appreciation, you must generate a timestamped valuation of the asset at the exact moment of transfer.
Chain of Custody:
Retain the Transaction Hash (TXID) as the primary receipt of compliance. This replaces the traditional paper receipt for physical cash seizures.
Fees & Costs
Network Fees ("Gas"):
The statute is silent on transaction costs. Update internal policies to either deduct network fees from the seized balance or require the seizing LEA to provide a wallet with sufficient funds to cover the transfer. Do not absorb these costs.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Secure Wallet" Verification: The law requires transfer to a wallet "not connected to an exchange or network." It is unclear how an RFI can technically verify the LEA's wallet status before transfer. Risk: Transferring to a compromised or "hot" wallet provided by an LEA could expose the RFI to negligence claims.
Venue Shopping: Venue is now tied to the seizing agency's location. Expect warrants from rural Texas counties with no geographic connection to the account holder. These are likely valid under SB1498; do not automatically contest based on lack of nexus.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
In Texas, civil asset forfeiture allows authorities to seize property�such as cash, vehicles, real estate, and other assets�connected to criminal activity. The goal is to disrupt illegal enterprises, particularly those involved in drug trafficking, fraud, money laundering, and organized crime.
With the rise of digital assets like cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and stablecoins, financial transactions have become more complex, creating new challenges for law enforcement. These assets, often decentralized and difficult to track, can be used to facilitate crimes such as fraud and money laundering. Unlike traditional property, digital assets require specialized tools and procedures for identification, seizure, and management.
S.B. 1498 establishes clear guidelines to ensure that digital assets can be effectively seized, stored, and forfeited under Texas law. By modernizing asset forfeiture procedures, it helps law enforcement combat financial crimes involving digital currencies and emerging technologies, preventing criminals from exploiting legal loopholes.
As proposed, S.B. 1498 amends current law relating to civil asset forfeiture of digital currency or other similar property.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Article 59.01, Code of Criminal Procedure, by amending Subdivisions (2), (7), and (9) and adding Subdivision (3-a), to redefine "contraband," "proceeds," and "depository account" and define "digital currency" and to make nonsubstantive changes.�
SECTION 2. Amends Article 59.023(a), Code of Criminal Procedure, as follows:
(a) Authorizes an attorney representing the state, on receiving an affidavit that identifies the amount of proceeds gained from the commission of an offense and that states probable cause that the proceeds are contraband subject to forfeiture, to file for a judgment in the amount of the proceeds in a district court in certain counties, including, if the property is a digital currency, non-fungible token, stablecoin, or wallet not connected to an exchange or network, the county in which the law enforcement agency that initiated the seizure of the property is located. Makes nonsubstantive changes.
SECTION 3. Amends Article 59.03(c), Code of Criminal Procedure, as follows:
(c)� Provides that a peace officer who seizes property under Chapter 59 (Forfeiture of Contraband) has custody of the property, subject only to replevy under Article 59.02 (Forfeiture of Contraband) or an order of a court. Provides that, not later than 72 hours after the seizure, certain actions may occur, including if the property seized is a digital currency, non-fungible token, or stablecoin, the law enforcement agency employing the peace officer is required to transfer the property to a wallet that is not connected to an exchange or network, and only accessible by the law enforcement agency or the attorney representing the state. Makes nonsubstantive changes.
SECTION 4. Amends Article 59.04(b), Code of Criminal Procedure, as follows:
(b)� Provides that a forfeiture proceeding commences under this chapter when the attorney representing the state files a notice of the seizure and intended forfeiture in the name of the state with the clerk of the district court in the county in which the seizure is made or, if the property is a digital currency, non-fungible token, stablecoin, or wallet not connected to an exchange or network, in the county in which the law enforcement agency that initiated the seizure of the property is located. Requires the attorney representing the state to attach to the notice the peace officer's sworn statement under Article 59.03 (Seizure of Contraband) or, if the property has been seized under Article 59.12(b) (relating to authorizing a regulated financial institution, at the time a seizure warrant issued under Chapter 18 (Search Warrants) is served on this institution to perform certain actions), the statement of the terms and amount of the depository account or inventory of assets provided by the regulated financial institution to the peace officer executing the warrant in the manner described by Article 59.12(b). Makes a nonsubstantive change.
SECTION 5. Amends Article 59.12(b), Code of Criminal Procedure, as follows:
(b)� Authorizes a regulated financial institution, at the time a seizure warrant issued under Chapter 18 is served on the institution, to perform certain actions, including transfer any digital currency, non-fungible token, or stablecoin held by the institution to a secure wallet that is not connected to an exchange or network and in the possession of a law enforcement agency or an attorney representing the state. Makes nonsubstantive changes.
SECTION 6. Makes application of this Act prospective.
Honorable Pete Flores, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB1498 by Nichols (Relating to civil asset forfeiture of digital currency or other similar property.), As Introduced
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined since the total number and value of forfeitures recovered by the state are unknown.
The bill would require law enforcement agencies to transfer seized digital currency, NFTs, and stablecoins to a wallet that is not connected to an exchange or network and only accessible by the law enforcement agency or the attorney representing the state.
The bill would make forfeiture proceedings involving property that is a digital currency, NFT, stablecoin, or wallet not connected to an exchange or network, commence in the county of the law enforcement agency that initiated the seizure of the property.
The bill would allow regulated financial institutions, at the time the appropriate seizure warrant is served on the institution, to transfer any digital currency, NFT, or stablecoin held by the institution to a secure wallet that is not connected to an exchange or network and is in the possession of a law enforcement agency or an attorney representing the state
According to the Comptroller of Public Accounts, the bill could increase revenue to the state; however, since the total number and value of future forfeitures are unknown, the total increase can not be determined.
It is assumed that any impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources would not be significant.
Local Government Impact
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time.
Source Agencies: b > td >
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, MGol, DA, JPa
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB1498 explicitly classifies digital currency, NFTs, and stablecoins as "contraband" subject to civil forfeiture in Texas. For Regulated Financial Institutions (RFIs) and crypto-custodians, this creates a new operational mandate: upon service of a seizure warrant, you must be capable of transferring digital assets directly to a law enforcement-controlled "cold wallet," rather than simply freezing the account in place. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025 (Applies to all seizures initiated on or after this date).
Q
Who authored SB1498?
SB1498 was authored by Texas Senator Robert Nichols during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB1498 signed into law?
SB1498 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB1498?
SB1498 is enforced by Texas Law Enforcement Agencies (Peace Officers), Attorneys representing the State (District Attorneys) and Texas District Courts.
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB1498?
The compliance urgency for SB1498 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB1498?
The cost impact of SB1498 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB1498 address?
SB1498 addresses topics including criminal procedure, criminal procedure--general, financial, financial--general and assets.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.