Relating to water losses reported by certain municipally owned utilities to the Texas Water Development Board; authorizing administrative penalties.
CriticalImmediate action required
High Cost
Effective:2025-05-29
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: May 29, 2025 (Immediate).
Compliance Deadline:
Validation: Due 180 days after your annual water audit is filed.
Mitigation Plan: Due 1 year after your annual water audit is filed.
Detailed Validation: Due December 31, 2030 (and every 10 years thereafter).
Agency Rulemaking: TWDB must define specific qualifications for "certified" validators. Watch the Texas Register closely in Q3/Q4 2025 for these definitions to ensure your chosen vendor qualifies.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Verify Threshold: Confirm immediately if your utility exceeds 150,000 potable water service connections.
2.Update Calendar: If you filed your audit on May 1, your Validation is due approx. Nov 1, and your Mitigation Plan is due May 1, 2026.
3.Issue RFP: Initiate procurement for a third-party validator immediately. Ensure the RFP explicitly excludes your current audit preparation vendor to satisfy independence requirements.
4.Draft Mitigation Goals: Convene engineering and finance heads to draft the 1, 3, 5, and 10-year water loss reduction targets required for the Plan.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Vendor Bifurcation: You must amend procurement policies to ensure independence. The law prohibits the person who prepares the water audit from validating it. You must hold separate contracts for Audit Preparation and Audit Validation.
Scope of Work (SOW): New contracts for validators must explicitly reference adherence to TWDB validation guidelines and include professional liability coverage for validation errors.
Hiring/Training
External Consultants: Immediate procurement is required for a certified third-party validator.
Internal Staff: Engineering and finance teams must collaborate to generate the financial ROI data required for the Mitigation Plan (cost of implementation vs. value of water saved).
Reporting & Record-Keeping
New Filing: The Water Loss Mitigation Plan is a new statutory document requiring 1, 3, 5, and 10-year targets for water loss reduction.
Annual Integration: Progress against this plan must be tracked and included in the existing Annual Water Conservation Report.
Audit Trail: You must retain documentation proving the validator’s certification and independence from the audit preparation team.
Fees & Costs
Consulting Fees: Budget immediately for third-party validation services.
Penalty Risk: A $25,000 administrative penalty applies for failure to submit the Mitigation Plan. This is a strict liability provision ("shall assess").
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Certified" Validator: The statute requires a "certified" validator but does not yet specify the certifying body (e.g., AWWA vs. a state-specific roster). Using a non-recognized consultant poses a compliance risk until TWDB rules are finalized.
Billing Data Investigation: The 2030 requirement for "investigation of billing data accuracy" is undefined. It is unclear if this requires physical meter testing or merely database auditing.
Penalty Stacking: The law specifies a penalty for failure to submit the plan. It is currently ambiguous whether TCEQ will assess this penalty once, annually for continued non-compliance, or if a "deficient" plan constitutes a "failure to submit."
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The bill author has informed the committee that large municipally owned utilities are losing an excessive amount of water through their infrastructure. According to a Texas Tribune article, 88 billion gallons of water were lost in Texas' most populous cities in 2023. The bill author has further informed the committee that his constituents in House District 17 are concerned about the billions of gallons of water that are pumped annually from the district to San Antonio, whose water system loses 21 billion gallons of water per year due to leaks, breaks, and other issues, as reported by the San Antonio Express-News. H.B. 29 seeks to address this issue by requiring certain municipally owned utilities that have filed an annual water audit with the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) indicating that the utility's real water loss meets or exceeds the threshold established by TWDB rule to take certain corrective actions.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 29 amends the Water Code to require a municipally owned utility, defined by reference to provisions relating to water rates and services, that provides potable water through more than 150,000 service connections and that has filed an annual water audit with the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) indicating that the utility's real water loss meets or exceeds the threshold established by TWDB rule to do the following:
·not later than the 180th day after the date the audit was filed, complete a validation of the audit to ensure the utility accurately assessed potential inaccuracies in data used in the audit;
·not later than the first anniversary of the date the audit was filed, develop and submit to the TWDB a water loss mitigation plan; and
·if the audit indicates that the utility's real water loss meets or exceeds the threshold for three consecutive audit years:
ocomplete a more detailed validation of the utility's most current water audit to determine whether the implementation of water leakage reduction strategies is appropriate and to investigate the accuracy of the utility's billing data; and
oupdate the utility's water loss mitigation plan accordingly.
H.B. 29 requires each audit validation regarding the accurate assessment by a utility of potential data inaccuracies to be performed by a person who has completed water audit validation training and is certified to conduct the validation. The bill requires the validation to follow TWDB validation guidelines and prohibits the validation from being conducted by a TWDB staff member or the person who submitted the water audit.
H.B. 29 requires each water loss mitigation plan, as updated if applicable, to be incorporated into the utility's most recent water conservation plan not later than the first anniversary of the date the mitigation plan is completed. The bill requires the utility, as part of its annual water conservation report, to report the utility's progress in implementing the mitigation plan. The bill requires the mitigation plan to include the following:
·one-year, three-year, five-year, and ten-year goals for water loss mitigation;
·descriptions of water loss mitigation projects or programs designed to meet those goals;
·estimated financial savings and water savings from the implementation of the projects or programs; and
·cost estimates for implementing each project or program.
H.B. 29 requires a utility that is required to complete the more detailed validation of its most current water audit to update its water loss mitigation plan to revise the one-year, three-year, five-year, and ten-year goals. The bill requires each such validation to be performed by a person who is experienced in performing required validation activities and prohibits the validation from being conducted by a TWDB staff member or the person who submitted the water audit. The bill additionally requires the validation to be based on the recommendations from the utility's audit validation regarding the accurate assessment of potential data inaccuracies, be completed in consultation with the person who completed that validation, and be conducted in accordance with industry standards.
H.B. 29 requires the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to assess against a municipally owned utility an administrative penalty of $25,000 for each violation of the bill's provisions.
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2025.
Honorable Cody Harris, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB29 by Gerdes (Relating to water losses reported by certain municipally owned utilities to the Texas Water Development Board; authorizing administrative penalties.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that any costs and revenue implications associated with the bill would be insignificant.
Local Government Impact
There could be a cost to certain municipally owned water utilities with more than 150,000 service connections that would be required to conduct water loss audit validations, develop water loss mitigation plans, and update the utilities' water conservation plans. Municipally owned water utilities could be assessed a $25,000 administrative penalty for each violation of the requirements outlined in the bill.
Source Agencies: b > td >
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, TUf, BC, CWi, CMA, AJL
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB29 is effective immediately and fundamentally changes water audit procedures for municipally owned utilities (MOUs) with over 150,000 service connections. These entities must now procure independent third-party validation of their water audits and submit a binding Water Loss Mitigation Plan to the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). Failure to submit this plan triggers a mandatory $25,000 administrative penalty assessed by the TCEQ.
Q
Who authored HB29?
HB29 was authored by Texas Representative Stan Gerdes during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB29 signed into law?
HB29 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 29, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB29?
HB29 is enforced by Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB29?
The compliance urgency for HB29 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB29?
The cost impact of HB29 is estimated as "high". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB29 address?
HB29 addresses topics including city government, city government--utilities, utilities, utilities--water & sewer and water.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.