Relating to the offenses of assault, harassment, and interference with public duties committed against certain employees or agents of a utility.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Local Law Enforcement (Police/Sheriff) • District and County Attorneys
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025
Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025 (Field staff must be in compliant attire on this date to receive protection).
Agency Rulemaking: No agency rulemaking required. This is a Penal Code modification enforced by local District Attorneys. However, internal corporate policy "rulemaking" must occur immediately to meet the effective date.
Immediate Action Plan
Audit Field Identification: Immediately review the attire of all field employees and contractors. If they are not clearly branded, they are not protected.
Update Vendor Contracts: Issue contract addendums to all field service vendors requiring visible identification as a condition of the "Agency" relationship.
Revise Incident Forms: Update security reporting templates to capture "Attire" and "Scope of Duty" by August 1, 2025.
Brief Local Law Enforcement: Have your security director send a memo to local police chiefs and DAs in your service territory highlighting the change in statute effective September 1.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Master Service Agreements (MSAs): You must amend agreements with third-party vendors (vegetation management, meter readers, line construction) to classify them as "agents" under the statute.
Identification Clauses: Insert strict clauses requiring vendor personnel to wear uniforms or high-visibility badging that clearly identifies them as agents of the utility. Failure to do so now constitutes a liability risk by waiving statutory safety protections.
Hiring/Training
Field Safety Protocols: Update training modules to instruct employees to verbally identify themselves ("I am a utility worker performing my duties") during any confrontation. This establishes the "knowledge" element required for felony prosecution.
Security Liaison Training: Security directors must be trained to cite Texas Penal Code Section 22.01 and SB482 explicitly in police reports to ensure local law enforcement charges the offense correctly (Felony vs. Misdemeanor).
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Incident Report Forms: Revise internal security incident forms immediately. New fields are required:
1.Attire Verification: Did the employee have a visible badge/uniform?
2.Scope of Duty: What specific utility task was being performed?
3.Verbal Warning: Did the employee identify themselves to the aggressor?
Fees & Costs
Uniform Inventory: Budget immediately for branded high-visibility gear for any plain-clothes field units.
Legal Review: Minimal costs associated with updating vendor MSAs and internal safety policy documents.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Criminal Negligence" in Interference: The statute criminalizes interference caused by "criminal negligence." It is unclear if a customer passively blocking access (e.g., refusing to unlock a gate) meets this threshold or if it requires active disruption. Expect local DAs to vary on prosecuting non-violent interference until case law settles the definition.
Visibility Standards: The law requires the actor to "know" the victim is a utility worker. It is undefined whether a generic safety vest constitutes "knowledge" or if specific utility branding is required. Operational Strategy: Assume generic PPE is insufficient; mandate branded gear to remove ambiguity.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
In the wake of Hurricane Beryl, utility workers restoring power faced not only the physical challenges of repairing downed power lines but also alarming hostility from some members of the public. These workers were met with harassment, verbal threats and, in some cases, physical assaults that put their safety at risk. They persisted in their essential work despite these dangers, highlighting the need for stronger legal protections for utility workers during emergencies. S.B. 482 enhances protections for utility workers by increasing criminal penalties for offenses committed against them while performing their duties during declared disasters or in areas with evacuation orders.
Bill Provisions:
As filed, S.B. 482 creates the following amendments to the Penal Code:
�Classifies assault against a utility worker while performing their duties in areas of declared disaster or evacuated areas as a third-degree felony.
�Classifies harassment of a utility worker during disasters as a Class A misdemeanor.
�Defines "utility" in detail, covering services like electricity, gas, telecommunications and pipelines.
As proposed, S.B. 482 amends current law relating to increasing the criminal penalties for the offenses of assault and harassment committed against certain employees or agents of a utility and committed in a disaster area or evacuated area.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Section 12.50, Penal Code, by adding Subsection (d-1) to prohibit a punishment for an offense, if that offense is punishable as a felony of the third degree under Section 22.01(b)(10), notwithstanding Section 12.50 (Penalty If Offense Committed in Disaster Area or Evacuated Area), from being increased under Subsection (c) (relating to the minimum term of confinement and prohibition of increased punishment for an offense under certain sections).
SECTION 2. Amends Section 12.501, Penal Code, by adding Subsection (d-1) to prohibit a punishment for an offense, if that offense is punishable as a Class A misdemeanor under Section 42.07(c)(3), notwithstanding Section 12.501 (Penalty for Certain Offenses Committed in Retaliation for or on Account of Person's Service or Status as Public Servant), from being increased under Subsection (d) (relating to the minimum term of confinement and prohibition of increased punishment for an offense under certain sections).
SECTION 3. Amends Section 22.01(b), Penal Code, as follows:
(b) Provides that an offense under Subsection (a)(1) (relating to classifying an offense as assault if a person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another, including the person's spouse) is a Class A misdemeanor, except that the offense is a felony of the third degree if the offense is committed against:
(1)-(7) makes no changes to these subdivisions;
(8)-(9) makes nonsubstantive changes to these subdivisions; and
(10) a person the actor knows or reasonably should know is an employee or agent of a utility while the person is performing a duty within the scope of that employment and located in certain areas.
SECTION 4. Amends Section 22.01(e), Penal Code, to define "utility."
SECTION 5. Amends Section 42.07(b), Penal Code, to define "utility."
SECTION 6. Amends Section 42.07(c), Penal Code, as follows:
(c) Provides that an offense under Section 42.07 (Harassment) is a Class B misdemeanor, except that the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if:
(1)-(2) makes nonsubstantive changes to these subdivisons; and
(3) the offense was committed against a person the actor knows or reasonably should know is an employee or agent of a utility while the person is performing a duty within the scope of that employment or agency and the offense was committed in certain areas.
SECTION 7. Makes application of this Act prospective.
Honorable Pete Flores, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB482 by Alvarado (Relating to increasing the criminal penalties for the offenses of assault and harassment committed against certain employees or agents of a utility and committed in a disaster area or evacuated area.), As Introduced
Increasing the penalty for an existing offense may result in increased demands upon state correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or sentenced to a term of confinement. The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the lack of data to estimate the prevalence of conduct outlined in the bill's provisions that would be subject to increased criminal penalties.
The bill would increase the criminal penalty for the offense of assault from a Class A misdemeanor to a third degree felony if the defendant assaulted a utility worker while performing their duties in areas of evacuation or disaster.The bill would increase the criminal penalty for the offense of harassment of a utility worker within an evacuation or disaster area from a Class B misdemeanor to a Class A misdemeanor.
The impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources cannot be determined due to the lack of data to estimate the prevalence of conduct outlined in the bill's provisions that would be subject to increased criminal penalties.
Local Government Impact
While the fiscal impact cannot be determined, increasing the penalty for an existing offense may result in increased demands upon local correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or sentenced to a term of confinement.
Source Agencies: b > td >
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, MGol, AMr, QH
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB482 elevates assault, harassment, and interference committed against utility employees and agents from minor misdemeanors to serious offenses, including Third Degree Felonies. This legal protection is not automatic; it is contingent upon the worker being visibly identifiable as a utility representative while performing their duties. Consequently, this legislation mandates a strict operational shift regarding field identification standards for both internal employees and third-party contractors to trigger these enhanced prosecutorial protections.
Q
Who authored SB482?
SB482 was authored by Texas Senator Carol Alvarado during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB482 signed into law?
SB482 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB482?
SB482 is enforced by Local Law Enforcement (Police/Sheriff) and District and County Attorneys.
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB482?
The compliance urgency for SB482 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB482?
The cost impact of SB482 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB482 address?
SB482 addresses topics including crimes, crimes--against persons, crimes--against persons--general, crimes--miscellaneous and disaster preparedness & relief.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.