Relating to rapid DNA analysis by certain law enforcement agencies, the establishment of a related pilot program, and the content of certain DNA databases.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Medium Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (via standard setting)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025 (DPS begins IT system updates).
Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2026 (Pilot Program operational launch). Vendors must have validation studies complete and hardware ready for procurement cycles prior to this date.
Agency Rulemaking: DPS is required to adopt rules regarding sample collection, preservation, and shipment. Critical Window: Between Q4 2025 and Q2 2026, DPS will define the technical criteria for "Authorized Law Enforcement Agencies." Monitor the *Texas Register* closely during this period.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Audit Technology: Immediately test all "Rapid DNA" inventory against the FBI’s *Quality Assurance Standards for Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories*.
2.Update Indemnification: Revise sales contracts to address liability for data privacy breaches and loss of state authorization.
3.Monitor Rulemaking: Assign a compliance officer to track DPS filings in the *Texas Register* starting September 2025 to comment on collection and preservation rules.
4.Prepare Validation Data: Compile proof-of-validation packages now; agencies will require these during the procurement phase for the 2026 pilot.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Master Services Agreements (MSAs): Vendors selling Rapid DNA hardware must amend MSAs to indemnify agencies against "loss of authorization" caused by equipment failure or software non-compliance.
Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Contracts for the Pilot Program must explicitly guarantee a 2-hour processing turnaround. Failure to meet this statutory metric constitutes a material breach.
Outsourcing Amendments: If a private entity is contracted for sample collection, the agreement must legally bind the contractor to DPS preservation and shipment rules (Section 5).
Hiring/Training
Validation Specialists: Technology vendors must deploy staff capable of conducting and documenting validation studies that satisfy FBI Quality Assurance Standards (QAS) to prove equipment proficiency to DPS.
Collection Staff: Phlebotomists and intake staff (including contractors) must be retrained on the specific, yet-to-be-published DPS protocols for Rapid DNA sample preservation.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Digitized Chain of Custody: Paper logs are insufficient for Rapid DNA integration. Systems must automatically generate digital chain-of-custody records compatible with CODIS interfaces.
Validation Documentation: Vendors must maintain and provide accessible records of FBI proficiency testing for all deployed units.
Collection Logs: Entities collecting samples must maintain specific records of collection and preservation until the sample is forwarded, subject to DPS audit.
Fees & Costs
Capital Expenditures: While the state has allocated ~$2M for initial device and software acquisition in 2026, vendors should anticipate absorbing the costs of required validation studies and FBI compliance testing.
Insurance: Review Professional Liability and Errors & Omissions (E&O) policies. Ensure coverage extends to regulatory audits and liability for data privacy breaches (e.g., inadvertent upload of PII to CODIS).
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The following areas are legally vague and will be defined by DPS rulemaking. Businesses must watch these areas to avoid investing in non-compliant workflows:
1."Authorized" Status Criteria: The statute says the Director "may" authorize an agency but does not list the technical checklist. The barrier to entry for your clients (LEAs) is currently undefined.
2.IT Integration Standards: The law mandates IT updates but does not specify the API or data standard for connecting local Rapid DNA machines to the state CODIS system.
3.Humanitarian Scope: The bill expands database use to humanitarian identification. It is unclear if private labs assisting in these cases are subject to the same strict criminal justice standards or a separate regulatory tier.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
In the 86th Legislature, H.B. 1399 was signed into law requiring collection of DNA samples by law enforcement at the time of booking for certain felony arrests. In the 88th Legislature, H.B. 3956 was signed into law requiring DNA samples to be collected at booking for all arrestees charged with a felony class offense. As a result of this historic legislation, in fiscal year 2024, the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) Crime Lab Division solved approximately 1,005 cases utilizing DNA collection at the time of booking.
New technology has emerged that severely decreases the time required to process the DNA samples that are collected at booking. Instead of taking up to between 24 to 72 hours and falling into a testing backlog, rapid DNA analysis allows for samples collected to be processed, analyzed, and provide results in 90 to 120 minutes. This breakthrough technology, when implemented, will streamline the DNA collection and analyzation process to solve cold cases, reduce DNA testing backlogs, and prevent violent, repeat offenders from committing crimes.
S.B. 1723 establishes a rapid DNA analysis pilot program under the guidance of DPS no later than September 1, 2026. DPS will select two counties to participate in the pilot program.
S.B. 1723 permits DPS and participating law enforcement agencies to consult with the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding rapid DNA analysis implementation and best practices.
DPS is directed to review the pilot program and submit a report to the legislature on the pilot program and any recommendations they may have regarding the continuation or expansion of the program no later than January 1, 2028.
Additionally, DPS is permitted to accept gifts, grants, and donations pertaining to funding the pilot program.
As proposed, S.B. 1723 amends current law relating to the establishment of a rapid DNA analysis pilot program in certain counties.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Texas Department of Public Safety in SECTION 1 (Section 411.1465, Government Code) of this bill.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Subchapter G, Chapter 411, Government Code, by adding Section 411.1465, as follows:
Sec. 411.1465. RAPID DNA ANALYSIS PILOT PROGRAM. (a) Defines "rapid DNA analysis."
(b) Requires the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) to establish a pilot program to optimize the process of reporting DNA records and decrease the number of arrests for which a DNA sample is not collected and analyzed by assisting law enforcement agencies in implementing rapid DNA analysis of DNA samples collected under Section 411.1471(b) (relating to requiring a law enforcement agency booking a defendant to require the defendant to provide one or more specimens for the purpose of creating a DNA record).
(c) Requires DPS, not later than September 1, 2025, to begin updating information technology systems as necessary to support the pilot program.
(d) Requires DPS, not later than September 1, 2026, to begin implementing the pilot program in two counties as determined by DPS. Authorizes DPS to expand the pilot program to additional counties.
(e) Authorizes DPS and each law enforcement agency participating in the pilot program to consult with the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding rapid DNA analysis implementation and best practices.
(f) Requires DPS, not later than January 1, 2028, to review the pilot program established under this section and submit a written report to the legislature on the pilot program and any recommendations regarding the continuation or expansion of the program.
(g) Authorizes DPS to solicit and accept gifts, grants, and donations from any public or private source to fund the pilot program.
(h) Authorizes DPS to adopt rules as necessary to implement this section.
(i) Provides that this section expires September 1, 2028.
SECTION 2. Effective date: upon passage or September 1, 2025.
Honorable Pete Flores, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB1723 by Creighton (Relating to the establishment of a rapid DNA analysis pilot program in certain counties.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB1723, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($6,489,194) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2026
($3,549,647)
2027
($2,939,547)
2028
($3,167,549)
2029
$0
2030
$0
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2025
2026
($3,549,647)
6.0
2027
($2,939,547)
6.0
2028
($3,167,549)
6.0
2029
$0
0.0
2030
$0
0.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would require the Department of Public Safety (DPS) to establish a pilot program to implement rapid analysis of DNA samples in at least two counties. Under the provisions of the bill, DPS would begin updating information technology systems to support the pilot program by September 1, 2025 and begin implementing the pilot program by September 1, 2026.
The bill would also require DPS to submit a written report to the legislature no later than January 1, 2028, on the progress of the pilot program and recommend continuation or expansion.
The provisions of the bill would expire September 1, 2028.
Methodology
According to DPS, the duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could not be absorbed within existing resources. DPS states that 6.0 full-time equivalent positions (FTEs) would be needed to staff the unit including 1.0 Forensic Scientist III, 1.0 Forensic Scientist IV, 1.0 Research Specialist IV, 1.0 Network Specialist IV, 1.0 Program Specialist, and 1.0 Project Management Specialist II. This analysis includes $645,249 in fiscal year 2026 and $645,249 in fiscal year 2027 for salary and benefits.
According to DPS, there would be $2,054,679 in capital expenditures in fiscal year 2026 only for Rapid DNA testing devices, change orders to CODIS and Livescan device software, and other capital equipment.
Other costs including consumables supplies for DNA testing, travel, fuel, rent, other operating expenses, and would total $849,719 in fiscal year 2026 and $2,294,298 in fiscal year 2027 and $2,521,800 in fiscal year 2028.
Technology
According to DPS, two change orders to information technology systems would be needed to comply with the provisions of the bill including CODIS ($200,000) and Livescan device software ($500,000) in fiscal year 2026 only.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
405 Department of Public Safety
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, MGol, CSh, KVEL
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB1723 decentralizes forensic processing by authorizing specific law enforcement agencies to conduct Rapid DNA analysis locally, moving intake away from centralized state labs. This legislation creates a new procurement market for forensic technology vendors and private laboratories but mandates strict adherence to FBI Quality Assurance Standards; failure to comply results in immediate revocation of authorization and contract termination. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 (DPS begins IT system updates).
Q
Who authored SB1723?
SB1723 was authored by Texas Senator Charles Creighton during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB1723 signed into law?
SB1723 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB1723?
SB1723 is enforced by Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (via standard setting).
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB1723?
The compliance urgency for SB1723 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB1723?
The cost impact of SB1723 is estimated as "medium". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB1723 address?
SB1723 addresses topics including criminal procedure, criminal procedure--general, law enforcement, dna and public safety, department of.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.