Relating to the procedures for the expunction of arrest records and files; authorizing a fee.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
District Court Clerks • Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025
Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025 (Applies to all petitions filed and orders entered on or after this date).
Agency Rulemaking: No formal state-level rulemaking is mandated, but 254 County District Clerks must independently compile and publish website directories of agency email addresses prior to the effective date.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Establish Dedicated Intake: Provision a permanent, monitored email alias (e.g., `expunctions@yourcompany.com`) immediately. Do not rely on individual employee email addresses.
2.Update Software Logic: Law firms must update case management systems to require email fields for all agencies and implement validation logic to prevent duplicate entity listings.
3.Monitor County Websites: Assign compliance staff to audit District Clerk websites starting August 2025 to ensure your entity's contact email is listed correctly.
4.Audit Vendor Compliance: Confirm your background check providers have transitioned to digital intake to prevent FCRA liability for reporting expunged records.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Background Screening Vendors: Update Master Service Agreements (MSAs) to require vendors to certify capability for electronic intake of expunction orders.
Indemnification: Revise clauses to specifically cover liability arising from "missed" electronic notices, as the physical paper trail of certified mail will no longer exist.
Hiring/Training
Intake Staff: Retrain legal compliance teams to treat emails from District Clerk domains as formal service of process, equivalent to certified mail.
Petitioners (Attorneys): Staff must be trained to consolidate service lists; the law now explicitly prohibits listing the same agency more than once in a single petition.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
District Clerks: Must transition from "destroy after one year" protocols to indefinite confidential retention of expunction orders.
Public Registries: Clerks must maintain a public-facing website listing the designated email addresses for all relevant agencies.
Petitioners: Must include valid email addresses for all respondents in the initial petition.
Fees & Costs
New Penalty Fee: A $25 fee applies per entity listed in a petition that is *unable* to receive electronic service.
Fee Repeals: Budget lines for Art. 102.006 fees (mailing notices/orders and ex parte filing fees) should be removed for orders entered after September 1, 2025.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Secure Electronic Mail" Standards: The statute does not define the technical standard for "secure" email (e.g., TLS encryption, password-protected PDF, or web portal). Businesses should anticipate inconsistent delivery methods across counties until the Office of Court Administration (OCA) issues guidance.
"Unable to Receive" Determination: It is unclear if an agency that simply fails to provide an email address to the Clerk triggers the $25 non-electronic service fee, or if the burden falls on the petitioner to discover the address.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
When a person wants to petition for their record to be expunged, the district clerk must send notices of an expunction to various entities such as law enforcement, court officials, and the Department of Public Safety (DPS). This process can become costly and time-consuming, especially when physically mailing the notices, because not all agencies receive them electronically. What's more, county fees for mailing expunctions vary, and multiple departments within DPS may receive separate notices about the expunction, creating redundancy and further increasing costs.
Current law limits expunction orders' retention period to sixty days and one year. Expunged criminal history, however, sometimes remains accessible online beyond this period. As a result, persons who do not retain their original expunction order often return to the clerk's office after the retention period expires to request a copy, only to find that it is no longer available, requiring them to restart the expunction process.
S.B. 1667, requested by the County and District Clerks' Association of Texas, would modernize the expunction process by making electronic service free to the filer and requiring state and local agencies to accept electronic service whenever possible. It would establish a standardized $25 fee per entity for cases where electronic service is not available, ensuring a more predictable cost structure for petitioners. What's more, S.B. 1667 would allow clerks to retain expunction orders indefinitely, ensuring persons can obtain copies of their expunction records if needed. By streamlining the expunction notification process, standardizing service fees, and extending record retention, S.B. 1667 would reduce mailing costs, improve efficiency, and provide petitioners with continued access to their expunction records.
As proposed, S.B. 1667 amends current law relating to the procedures for the expunction of arrest records and files and authorizes a fee.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Article 55A.203, Code of Criminal Procedure, by adding Subsection (d), as follows:
(d) Requires a person entitled to expunction under Article 55A.053(a)(2)(A) (relating to entitling certain persons to have all records and files expunged if the court finds that the indictment or information was dismissed or quashed because the person completed a veterans treatment court program) or (B) (relating to entitling certain persons to have all records and files expunged if the court finds that the indictment or information was dismissed or quashed because the person completed a mental health court program) to provide the court with the information required in a petition for expunction under Article 55A.253.
SECTION 2. Amends Article 55A.253, Code of Criminal Procedure, as follows:
Art. 55A.253. CONTENTS OF PETITION. (a) Creates this subsection from existing text. Requires that an ex parte petition filed under certain articles of the Code of Criminal Procedure be verified and include, with respect to the person who is the subject of the petition, certain information, including the applicable physical and e-mail addresses, rather than physical or e-mail addresses, of certain entities.
(b) Prohibits a petition under this article from listing any state or local agency more than once or including multiple contacts or addresses for different divisions with respect to the same state or local agency.
(c) Requires each district clerk to compile and maintain on the clerk's Internet website a list of the agencies and entities described by Subsection (a)(8)(A) (relating to requiring that an ex parte petition include a list of certain agencies, officials, or entities) and include the applicable e-mail addresses for those agencies and entities. Provides that the district clerk is not responsible for ensuring that the website contains a complete list of agencies and entities described by Subsection (a)(8)(A) or a petition filed under this article contains a complete list of agencies and entities described by Subsection (a)(8)(A).
SECTION 3. Amends Article 55A.254, Code of Criminal Procedure, by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsections (a-1), (d), (e), (f), and (g), as follows:
(a) Requires the court to set a hearing on an ex parte petition for expunction not earlier than the 30th day following the date the petition is filed and to give a copy of the petition and notice of hearing to each official, agency, or other entity listed in the petition, other than central federal depositories of criminal records, by certain means. Deletes existing text requiring the court to set the hearing not earlier than 30 days from the filing of the petition and to give to each official or agency or other governmental entity named in the petition reasonable notice of the hearing by certain means.
(a-1) Provides that the clerk of the court is not required to transmit a copy of either the petition or notice of the hearing to the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System (OCA).
(d) Requires a state or local agency with an e-mail address that is identified under Article 55A.253(a) to accept a copy of the petition or notice of hearing that is provided in an electronic format by the clerk of the court.
(e) Prohibits the clerk of the court from charging a fee to electronically transmit a copy of the petition or notice of hearing to an official, agency, or other entity for which an e-mail address or other means of electronic transmission is provided in the petition.
(f) Requires the clerk of the court to charge a fee of $25 for each official, agency, or other entity that is listed in the petition that is unable to receive an electronic transmission under Subsection (e).
(g) Requires the Department of Public Safety (DPS), on receipt of a copy of a petition or notice of hearing under Article 55A.254 (Hearing; Notice), to notify the appropriate central federal depositories of criminal records listed in the petition.
SECTION 4. Amends Article 55A.256, Code of Criminal Procedure, by amending Subsection (c) and adding Subsection (c-1), as follows:
(c) Makes a conforming change to this subsection.
(c-1) Prohibits an application for expunction under Article 55A.256 (Application for Expunction Based on Mistaken Identity) from listing any state or local agency more than once or including multiple contacts or addresses for different divisions with respect to the same state or local agency.
SECTION 5. Amends Article 55A.351, Code of Criminal Procedure, by amending Subsections (a), (b), and (c) and adding Subsections (b-1), (b-2), and (b-3), as follows:
(a) Requires the clerk of the court, when an expunction order issued under Subchapter E (Procedures for Automatic Entry of Expunction Order) or Subchapter F (General Procedures for Seeking Entry of Expunction Order) is final, to send a copy, rather than a certified copy, of the order to the Crime Records Service of DPS, OCA, and each official or agency or other governmental entity of this state or of any political subdivision of this state listed, rather than named, in that order.
(b) Makes a conforming change to this subsection.
(b-1) Requires a state or local agency with an e-mail address that is identified under Article 55A.253 or 55A.256 to accept a copy of an expunction order that is provided in an electronic format by the clerk of the court.
(b-2) Prohibits the clerk of the court from charging a fee to electronically transmit a copy of the expunction order to an official or agency or other governmental entity for which an e-mail address or other means of electronic transmission is provided in the applicable petition or application.
(b-3) Requires the clerk of the court to charge a fee of $25 for each official, agency, or other governmental entity that is listed in the applicable petition or application and that is unable to receive an electronic transmission under Subsection (b-2).
(c) Makes a conforming change to this subsection.
SECTION 6. Amends Article 55A.352(c), Code of Criminal Procedure, to make a conforming change.
SECTION 7. Amends Article 55A.353, Code of Criminal Procedure, to make conforming changes.
SECTION 8. Amends Article 55A.354, Code of Criminal Procedure, to make a conforming change.
SECTION 9. Amends Article 55A.356, Code of Criminal Procedure, by amending Subsection (c) and adding Subsection (c-1), as follows:
(c) Requires the clerk of the court, with certain exceptions, to destroy all the files or other records maintained under Subsection (b) (relating to requiring the clerk of the court issuing the order to obliterate all public references to the proceeding), other than the expunction order itself, on the first anniversary of the date the order is issued, rather than not earlier than the 60th day after the date the order is issued or later than the first anniversary of that date, unless the records or files were released under Article 55A.355 (Providing Expunged Records to Person Who is Subject to Expunction).
(c-1) Requires the clerk of the court to maintain the expunction order in a confidential manner and provide a copy to the person subject to the order after proper presentation of identification, subject to any further order from the court regarding access to the order.
SECTION 10. Repealers: Articles 55A.356(d) (relating to requiring the clerk to provide notice by certain means to the attorney representing the state not later than the 30th date before the clerk destroys files or other records) and (e) (relating to requiring the clerk to certify to the court the destruction of files or other records), Code of Criminal Procedure.
Repealer: Article 102.006 (Fees in Expunction Proceedings), Code of Criminal Procedure.
SECTION 11. Makes application of Articles 55A.203, 55A.253, 55A.254, and 55A.256, Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended by this Act, prospective.
SECTION 12. Makes application of Article 55A.351, as amended by this Act, prospective.
SECTION 13. Provides that Article 55A.356(c), Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended by this Act, Article 55A.356(c-1), Code of Criminal Procedure, as added by this Act, and Articles 55A.356(d) and (e), Code of Criminal Procedure, as repealed by this Act, apply to any records and files in the possession of the court on or after the effective date of this Act.
SECTION 14. Provides that the repeal of Article 102.006, Code of Criminal Procedure, by this Act applies to an expunction order entered on or after the effective date of this Act, regardless of whether the underlying arrest occurred before, on, or after the effective date of this Act.
SECTION 15. Provides that, to the extent of any conflict, this Act prevails over another Act of the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, relating to nonsubstantive additions to and corrections in enacted codes.
Honorable Pete Flores, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB1667 by Zaffirini (Relating to the procedures for the expunction of arrest records and files; authorizing a fee.), As Introduced
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to a lack of available case-level data.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to adjust fee collections and procedures for certain expunctions.
The bill would require court clerks to charge a new $25 fee for each official, agency, or other governmental entity that is listed in a petition for expungement and that is unable to receive electronic transmission of the expungement record. The bill would also repeal certain expungement fees, including fees charged for filing an ex parte petition in a civil action in a district court, a $1 fee for mailing a notice of hearing date, and a $2 fee for mailing certified copies of an order of expunction.
According to information provided by the Office of Court Administration, any changes in revenue to the state can not be determined due to an unknown number of petitions and orders filed pursuant to the provisions of the bill.
Local Government Impact
According to the Comptroller of Public Accounts, the $25 fee would be a new source of revenue for local entities, but the fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the number of petitions and orders filed under the provisions of the bill being unknown.
Source Agencies: b > td >
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, MGol, DA, JPa, MW
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB1667 mandates the digitization of criminal record expunctions effective September 1, 2025, shifting the primary method of service from certified mail to "secure electronic mail. " This legislation imposes immediate operational obligations on Consumer Reporting Agencies (CRAs), law firms, and government entities to establish dedicated email intake systems, while penalizing reliance on paper notices with new fees. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 Compliance Deadline: September 1, 2025 (Applies to all petitions filed and orders entered on or after this date).
Q
Who authored SB1667?
SB1667 was authored by Texas Senator Judith Zaffirini during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB1667 signed into law?
SB1667 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB1667?
SB1667 is enforced by District Court Clerks and Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS).
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB1667?
The compliance urgency for SB1667 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB1667?
The cost impact of SB1667 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB1667 address?
SB1667 addresses topics including courts, courts--district, criminal procedure, criminal procedure--general and criminal records.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.