Relating to the compensation of a distributed renewable generation owner in certain areas outside of ERCOT.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Medium Cost
Effective:2026-09-01
Enforcing Agencies
Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2026
Compliance Deadline:Immediate for Financial Modeling. While the statutory bar takes effect in 2026, businesses projecting ROI for solar projects coming online after that date must adjust financial models to reflect this new regulatory safeguard.
Agency Rulemaking:High Probability (2025-2026). The PUC must determine what constitutes "established best practices" for the required CBA. Expect a contested rulemaking period prior to the effective date to define the methodology utilities must use.
Immediate Action Plan
Audit Geography: Confirm which of your Texas facilities are in non-ERCOT territories (e.g., El Paso, Panhandle, East Texas). Facilities within ERCOT are not protected by this bill.
Preserve Data: Ensure your solar inverters and metering equipment are recording high-resolution interval data to prove your load profile does not harm the grid.
Update Financial Models: For projects with a 2026+ COD (Commercial Operation Date), adjust risk profiles to reflect that net metering rates are statutorily protected until proven otherwise.
Monitor Rulemaking: Instruct your trade association representatives to intervene when the PUC opens the docket to define the CBA methodology.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs): Third-party solar developers and host customers must review "Change in Law" and "Tariff Modification" clauses. This statute strengthens the stability of projected savings, but contracts should explicitly address how parties will share costs if a utility successfully passes a new fee via a CBA after 2026.
ROI Projections: Capital expenditure proposals for non-ERCOT facilities can now assume a higher degree of rate stability. Update internal investment memos to reflect that adverse rate changes now require a significant regulatory hurdle.
Hiring/Training
Regulatory Monitoring: In-house counsel or compliance officers must be trained to monitor PUC filings for "Alternative Compensation Method" applications starting late 2026.
Technical Consultants: If your utility files a rate case, you will need to engage energy economists or rate analysts to challenge the utility's CBA methodology.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Generation Logging: Maintain granular data on your facility's onsite generation and consumption. If a utility attempts to alter rates based on a CBA, you must possess your own load profile data to rebut claims regarding your facility's impact on peak demand or grid stability.
Fees & Costs
Fee Prevention: This bill is a defensive measure designed to prevent the implementation of new "solar surcharges" or "standby fees."
Litigation Budget: Allocate potential budget for legal intervention. If a utility files a CBA to lower solar credit rates, trade associations and large commercial users will need to fund a legal intervention to protect the current rate structure.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The statute relies on terms that are not strictly defined, creating a battleground for future PUC rulemaking:
1."Established Best Practices": The law requires the CBA to follow this standard, but there is no single industry consensus. Utilities will push for methodologies that highlight lost revenue; businesses must push for "Value of Solar" methodologies that quantify avoided transmission and capacity costs.
2."Comprehensive": It is unclear if the analysis must include non-energy benefits such as environmental compliance savings or grid resilience. The broader the definition of "comprehensive," the better the outcome for solar owners.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Under current law, distributed renewable generation owners that operate outside the purview of ERCOT have statutorily prescribed methods of compensation within the Public Utility Regulatory Act. However, this could prevent the Public Utility Commission of Texas from exercising flexibility with respect to those owners as the nature of alternative energy generation evolves within Texas. H.B. 912 seeks to address this issue by specifying the application of statutory provisions related to compensation for distributed renewable generation owners in certain areas outside of ERCOT.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 912 amends the Utilities Code to specify that existing statutory provisions related to compensation for distributed renewable generation owners that choose interconnection through a single meter apply unless the Public Utility Commission of Texas approves an alternative method for the compensation of such an owner for electricity generated by distributed renewable generation or a qualifying facility.
HB912 prohibits investor-owned electric utilities outside the ERCOT grid (e. g. , El Paso Electric, SWEPCO) from altering net metering rates or imposing distributed generation fees without first submitting a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to the Public Utility Commission (PUC).
Q
Who authored HB912?
HB912 was authored by Texas Representative Joseph Moody during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB912 signed into law?
HB912 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB912?
HB912 is enforced by Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB912?
The compliance urgency for HB912 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB912?
The cost impact of HB912 is estimated as "medium". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB912 address?
HB912 addresses topics including energy, energy--general, utilities, utilities--electric and utilities--general.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.