Relating to access to criminal history record information that relates to providers and provider applicants under Medicaid and other public benefits programs administered by the Health and Human Services Commission.
CriticalImmediate action required
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) • HHSC Office of Inspector General (OIG)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date:June 20, 2025 (Law took immediate effect upon signature).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. New enrollment applications must comply now. Existing providers must be compliant by their next re-validation cycle, but internal audits should be completed immediately to prevent payment holds.
Agency Rulemaking: HHSC is expected to update the Provider Enrollment Management System (PEMS) and issue guidance defining the scope of "Managing Employee" and asset valuation methods for security interests. Expect these clarifications within 60-90 days.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Audit Leadership: Immediately run background checks on all "Managing Employees" and Officers; do not wait for re-validation.
2.Review Debt Structure: Identify any lender holding a security interest (mortgage, note, deed of trust) against >5% of your assets. Request their criminal history representations immediately.
3.Update Legal Templates: Insert "Medicaid Eligibility" contingencies into all future executive employment offers and commercial loan term sheets.
4.Prepare for Re-validation: Ensure your PEMS profile matches your new internal audit data regarding managers and owners.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
You must amend three specific contract categories to include "Bad Actor" and indemnification clauses:
1.Employment Agreements: For all management-level staff, employment must be contingent on clearing HHSC/OIG checks.
2.Loan/Security Agreements: Private lenders holding >5% security interest must warrant they have no disqualifying criminal history and agree to submit PII for screening.
3.Operating Agreements: Partners and officers must consent to screening; the entity requires the power to buy out or strip voting rights from disqualified individuals to preserve the provider number.
Hiring/Training
Expanded Roster: HR must expand background checks beyond clinical staff. You must now screen any "Managing Employee" (General Managers, Administrators, Business Managers) regardless of their ownership status.
Consent Collection: Implement a process to collect PII and consent forms from non-employee stakeholders (e.g., private lenders or silent partners) for submission to HHSC.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Org Chart Updates: Update internal organizational charts to explicitly identify:
5% Direct/Indirect Owners.
5% Security Interest Holders (Lenders).
Officers, Directors, and Partners.
Managing Employees (defined by operational control).
Audit Trail: Maintain proof of screening for all individuals in these categories to present during OIG audits.
Fees & Costs
Administrative Costs: Budget for increased legal fees to amend corporate/loan documents and increased administrative time for processing expanded background checks.
State Fees: No new state fees are imposed by the statute itself.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Managing Employee" Definition: The statute defines this as anyone exercising "operational or managerial control." HHSC has not yet clarified if this extends to department-level heads (e.g., Director of Billing) or remains at the C-Suite level. Guidance: If they have signature authority or authorize contracts, screen them.
"Security Interest" Valuation: The law applies to interests equaling "at least five percent of the value of the property or other assets." The method for valuing assets (Book Value vs. Fair Market Value) is undefined. Guidance: If a lender’s stake is near the 5% threshold, treat them as subject to the law.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The Health and Human Services Commission's Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducts certain screening activities required at the federal and state levels for providers seeking to enroll in Medicaid, CHIP, and other state health programs. The bill author has informed the committee that the screenings and reviews promote compliance with federal and state provider enrollment program integrity requirements, increase accountability for the appropriate use of taxpayer resources by helping to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse, and protect the health and safety of Texans. In 2023, new federal requirements were established regarding the FBI's criteria for the use of criminal background check information, and the 88th Texas Legislature responded through the enactment of H.B. 4123 to update and clarify criminal background check requirements in state law. However, the bill author has further informed the committee that the FBI identified further deficiencies in state law, citing overly broad categories that they would like further defined, and granted the OIG a grace period until April 1, 2026, to make the necessary statutory changes or risk losing access to critical criminal history record information, which would make the OIG unable to complete appropriate background checks on providers to protect Texas Medicaid and healthcare program clients. C.S.H.B. 4643 seeks to address this issue by adding clear definitions in statute regarding an agency's access to criminal history record information with respect to certain public benefits programs.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 4643 amends the Government Code to include any agency operating part of a public benefits program, including Medicaid, among the agencies entitled to obtain certain criminal history record information that relates to an applicable provider or person applying to enroll as a provider. With respect to such a provider or an applicant, the bill removes the specification that the providers or applicants about which that information may be obtained be a Medicaid provider or applicant for enrollment as a Medicaid provider and instead specifies that the providers or applicants about which that information may be obtained are providers of a public benefits program administered by the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) or an applicant for enrollment as a provider under such a program.
C.S.H.B. 4643 clarifies that such criminal history record information that HHSC or the office of inspector general is authorized to obtain includes information relating to the following:
·a person that:
ohas a direct or indirect ownership interest, or a combination of direct and indirect ownership interests, that equals five percent or more in the provider or person applying to enroll as a provider;
oowns an interest of five percent or more in a mortgage, deed of trust, promissory note, or other obligation secured by the provider or person applying to enroll as a provider if that interest equals at least five percent of the value of the property or other assets of the provider or person applying to enroll as a provider;
ois an officer or director of the provider or person applying to enroll as a provider if that provider or applicant is organized as a corporation; or
ois a partner in the provider or person applying to enroll as a provider if that provider or applicant is organized as a partnership; and
·a managing employee of the provider or person applying to enroll as a provider.
C.S.H.B. 4643 defines the following terms:
·"managing employee," with respect to a provider or person applying to enroll as a provider, as an individual, including a general manager, business manager, administrator, or director, who does the following:
oexercises operational or managerial control over all or part of the provider or applicant; or
odirectly or indirectly conducts the daily operations of all or part of the provider or applicant;
·"ownership interest," with respect to a provider or person applying to enroll as a provider, as having equity in the provider's or applicant's capital, stock, or profits; and
·"provider" as an individual or entity that engages in the delivery of health care services and is authorized to deliver those services in Texas, including an individual or entity that delivers health care services to Medicaid recipients.
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 4643 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
The substitute includes provisions absent from the introduced expanding the agencies entitled to obtain certain criminal history record information and changes the types of providers and applicants about which such information may be obtained.
Both the introduced and the substitute define certain terms with respect to access to criminal history record information but differ in the following ways:
·the substitute omits the definition of "Medicaid agency"; and
·the substitute replaces the definition of "provider" as an individual or entity that provides Medicaid services under an agreement with the Medicaid agency or an individual or entity that engages in the delivery of health care services through the Medicaid managed care program and is authorized by the state to deliver those services, as in the introduced, with a definition of that term as an individual or entity that engages in the delivery of health care services and is authorized to deliver those services in Texas, including an individual or entity that delivers health care services to Medicaid recipients.
The substitute changes the bill's effective date to provide for its possible immediate effect, contingent on receiving the requisite constitutional vote, whereas the introduced provided only for the bill to take effect April 1, 2025, contingent on receiving the requisite constitutional vote.
Honorable Lacey Hull, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB4643 by Dorazio (Relating to access to criminal history record information for purposes of the Medicaid program.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would expand the criteria under which the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is entitled to obtain criminal history record information that relates to Medicaid providers or those applying to enroll as Medicaid providers.
The bill would take effect April 1, 2025, assuming it received the requisite two-thirds majority votes in both houses of the Legislature. Otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2025.
According to HHSC, updates to websites and processes would be necessary to implement the provisions of the bill. This analysis assumes that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
529 Health and Human Services Commission
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, NPe, ER, ESch
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB4643 is effective immediately, mandating a significant expansion of criminal history screening for all HHSC public benefit providers (Medicaid, CHIP, etc. ). The law pierces the corporate veil, requiring providers to disclose and screen not only direct owners but also "Managing Employees" and financial stakeholders holding a 5% or greater security interest in the business.
Q
Who authored HB4643?
HB4643 was authored by Texas Representative Mark Dorazio during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB4643 signed into law?
HB4643 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB4643?
HB4643 is enforced by Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) and HHSC Office of Inspector General (OIG).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB4643?
The compliance urgency for HB4643 is rated as "critical". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB4643?
The cost impact of HB4643 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB4643 address?
HB4643 addresses topics including human services, human services--medical assistance, criminal records, medicaid and health care providers.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.