Relating to the Health and Human Services Commission's office of inspector general, the review of certain Medicaid claims, and the recovery of certain overpayments under Medicaid.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Medium Cost
Effective:2025-05-29
Enforcing Agencies
Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) • Office of Inspector General (OIG) • Third-party Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date:May 29, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. Your intake teams must be ready to screen and potentially reject RAC requests starting May 29.
Agency Rulemaking: The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) must adopt rules establishing the appeals process for RAC findings.
*Regulatory Gray Zone:* Between May 29 and the finalization of these rules, the specific procedural steps for appealing a RAC determination remain undefined. We anticipate draft rules in Q3 2025.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Configure Software Logic: Update release-of-information software to flag/block RAC requests for dates of service within the last 365 days.
2.Establish Audit Cross-Check: Create a workflow requiring staff to cross-reference RAC requests against the internal MCO audit log prior to data submission.
3.Review MCO Contracts: Identify exposure to pass-through liability for RAC findings and prepare legal arguments regarding indemnification limits.
4.Monitor Rulemaking: Subscribe to HHSC alerts specifically for the RAC Appeals Process rules; the window to comment will be short.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
MCO Provider Agreements: Review "Indemnification" and "Overpayment Recovery" clauses immediately. The law allows the state to recover from the MCO; the MCO will contractually attempt to pass this liability (and potentially the RAC's contingency fee) down to the provider.
Vendor Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Update agreements with third-party billing or release-of-information vendors. They must be contractually obligated to notify you of a RAC request within 24 hours to ensure you do not miss statutory submission deadlines.
Hiring/Training
"Gatekeeper" Training: Train Health Information Management (HIM) and compliance staff to stop automatic processing of audit requests. They must perform a "Triage Check" before releasing data:
1. Is the claim less than 365 days old? (If yes, reject based on Sec. 544.0504).
2. Is the claim currently under MCO review? (If yes, reject based on "Double Jeopardy" provisions).
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Centralized Audit Log: You must maintain a real-time log of all active audits by Claim ID. You cannot utilize the statutory defense against RAC audits without documented proof that an MCO is already auditing the specific claim.
Credentialing Files: Maintain current proof of "Good Standing" from licensing boards for all professionals. This documentation is now the statutory rebuttal against OIG demands for fingerprint-based criminal history checks.
Fees & Costs
Contingency Fee Exposure: RACs are paid a percentage of recovered funds. Expect an increase in technical denials and aggressive coding interpretations.
Insurance: Verify that your Regulatory Billing E&O policy covers defense costs for multi-agency investigations, as the OIG now has expanded authority to share data with law enforcement.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Cost-Effective" Threshold: The statute permits RAC reviews only if "cost-effective," but fails to define a minimum dollar amount. Without a defined floor in upcoming rulemaking, RACs may target high-volume, low-dollar claims that cost more to defend than to pay.
The Appeals Process: The Executive Commissioner must create an appeals process. It is currently unclear if this will mirror the formal administrative hearing process or be a streamlined "desk review." This is the primary area for industry advocacy during the rulemaking comment period.
Recovery Hierarchy: The law allows recovery from the Provider *or* the MCO. HHSC has not defined the logic for who gets the demand letter first. If they target the MCO for administrative ease, providers may lose direct control over the defense of the claim.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
According to the office of inspector general (OIG) of the Health and Human Services Commission in information provided to the House Committee on Human Services of the 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, the OIG faces multiple barriers under current law. For instance, the OIG notes that there are conflicting statutory provisions relating to the procurement of experts, the OIG is prohibited from conducting criminal history checks on licensed health care professionals who are in good standing, there are inefficacies regarding the required fraud hotline, and the OIG is unable to coordinate with other states in detecting fraud, waste, and abuse in Texas' health and human services programs.
C.S.H.B. 142 seeks to clarify these issues by correcting those conflicting provisions, narrowing the prohibition to fingerprint-based criminal history record information check, providing flexibility in the manner the OIG receives reports of fraud, waste, and abuse, and authorizing the OIG to disclose information to other governmental bodies. Additionally, the bill seeks to repeal a requirement for an annual review of Medicaid claims based on a method that is outdated and produces limited results.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 142 amends the Government Code to set out and revise provisions relating to the administration, authority, and duties of the office of inspector general (OIG) of the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC).
Contract for Review of Investigative Findings by Qualified Expert
C.S.H.B. 142 removes the following statutory provisions relating to contracts for the services of a qualified expert to review the OIG's investigative findings based on medical necessity, the quality of medical care, the necessity of dental services, or the quality of dental care:
·the authorization for HHSC, if it did not receive any responsive bids on a competitive solicitation for the services and the number of contracts to be awarded is not otherwise limited, to negotiate with and award a contract for the services on the basis of the contractor's agreement to a set fee and the contractor's affirmation and the OIG's verification that the contractor possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience; and
·the provision establishing that a contract awarded on that basis is not subject to competitive advertising and proposal evaluation requirements.
The bill establishes instead that a qualified expert retained by HHSC on behalf of the OIG is considered an expert witness for purposes of the exemption to obtain such witnesses from the State Purchasing and General Services Act.
Permitted Disclosure of Certain Information
C.S.H.B. 142 authorizes the OIG, for purposes of performing its statutory duties, to disclose information obtained in the course of conducting the OIG's administrative oversight activities to the following persons and entities:
·a federal, state, or local governmental entity, including:
oa federal agency or an agency of this state or another state;
othe criminal, civil, or administrative department, division, bureau, or other entity with enforcement or prosecutorial authority of this state, the United States, another state, or a local governmental entity of this state or another state; and
oa political subdivision of this state; or
·a person authorized by the OIG to receive the information.
Medicaid Provider Criminal History Record Checks
C.S.H.B. 142 makes the following changes to the prohibition against the OIG conducting a criminal history record information check of a health care professional to determine the professional's eligibility to participate as a Medicaid provider if the OIG confirmed with a licensing authority that the professional is licensed and in good standing:
·specifies that the prohibition applies to a fingerprint-based criminal history record information check; and
·specifies that the prohibition does not apply if federal law requires otherwise.
Fraud Reporting Method
C.S.H.B. 142 changes from a toll-free telephone hotline to an appropriate communications system the type of communication method that HHSC or a health and human services agency must maintain and promote for reporting suspected fraud in programs HHSC or a health and human services agency administers.
Repealed Requirements
C.S.H.B. 142 repeals Section 544.0201 and Section 544.0252(a), Government Code, which respectively do the following:
·require HHSC to annually select and review a random, statistically valid sample of all claims for Medicaid reimbursement, including under the vendor drug program, for potential cases of fraud, waste, or abuse and to use the annual review results to determine the types of claims toward which HHSC resources for fraud and abuse detection should be primarily directed; and
·require the OIG to conduct a preliminary investigation of an allegation of fraud or abuse against a provider that HHSC receives from any source to determine whether there is a sufficient basis to warrant a full investigation, with specified deadlines for the beginning and completion of that preliminary investigation.
Federal Waiver Contingency
If before implementing any provision of the bill a state agency determines that a waiver or authorization from a federal agency is necessary for implementation of that provision, the agency affected by the provision must request the waiver or authorization and may delay implementing that provision until the waiver or authorization is granted.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 142 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
Whereas the introduced established that the State Purchasing and General Services Act does not apply to HHSC's procuring of a contract for the services of a qualified expert to the same extent that act does not apply to obtaining expert witnesses for legal services, the substitute establishes that a qualified expert retained by HHSC on behalf of the OIG is considered an expert witness for purposes relating to the exemption for legal services under that act.
Honorable Lacey Hull, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB142 by Noble (Relating to the administration, authority, and duties of the Health and Human Services Commission's office of inspector general.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
529 Health and Human Services Commission
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, NPe, ER, NT
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB142 mandates the aggressive expansion of Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)—third-party auditors incentivized by contingency fees—to identify and recover Medicaid overpayments effective May 29, 2025. This legislation exposes Medicaid providers and Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) to heightened scrutiny but establishes critical statutory defenses regarding claim age and concurrent reviews that you must operationalize immediately to prevent revenue loss. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: May 29, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Q
Who authored HB142?
HB142 was authored by Texas Representative Candy Noble during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB142 signed into law?
HB142 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 29, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB142?
HB142 is enforced by Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC), Office of Inspector General (OIG) and Third-party Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB142?
The compliance urgency for HB142 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB142?
The cost impact of HB142 is estimated as "medium". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB142 address?
HB142 addresses topics including human services, human services--medical assistance, health & human services commission, inspector general for health & human services and electronic information systems.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.