Relating to the authority of a city to impose certain governmental requirements on an agricultural operation.
LowStandard timeline
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Municipalities (restricted from enforcement) • Texas Courts (for declaratory judgment actions against non-compliant cities)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Effective immediately upon signature).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. You may cease compliance with conflicting municipal ordinances as of the effective date.
Agency Rulemaking: None required. This is a statutory limitation on municipal power; however, monitor local city councils for reactionary changes to nuisance ordinances.
Immediate Action Plan
Audit: Map all locations where your crews currently maintain public rights-of-way and verify if this is voluntary or compelled by city ordinance.
Cease: Stop mandatory mowing of public ROWs immediately.
Reject: Instruct legal counsel to reject any municipal demand for tax appraisal certificates as a condition of zoning or permitting.
Dismiss: File motions to dismiss any pending municipal citations regarding ROW vegetation or tax-status zoning violations, citing the retroactive application of Section 2.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Lease Agreements: Review agricultural leases immediately. Standard clauses requiring tenants to "comply with all local ordinances" no longer compel the tenant to mow public rights-of-way.
Landlord Action: If a landowner requires the public ROW to be maintained for aesthetic reasons, the lease must be amended to make this a private contractual obligation, as it is no longer a legal municipal requirement.
Hiring/Training
Maintenance Crews: Issue a "Stop Work" order for vegetation maintenance on public rights-of-way (ditches, easements) where such work is performed solely to satisfy city code.
Risk Management: By removing crews from public roadways, you reduce liability exposure. Update safety logs to reflect this change in operational scope.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Zoning Disputes: Cease providing Article VIII, Section 1-d or 1-d-1 tax appraisal documents to municipalities. Cities are statutorily barred from requiring these documents to verify your status as an agricultural operation.
Alternative Proof: Prepare alternative documentation (sales receipts, feed logs, timber management plans) to prove "Agricultural Operation" status under Texas Agriculture Code § 251.002, should a city challenge your classification without the tax form.
Fees & Costs
Cost Savings: Immediate reduction in labor and equipment costs associated with mowing public property.
Fines: Do not pay new fines related to these specific ordinances issued after June 20, 2025. Contest any fines based on retroactivity.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
Verification of Status: The law bans cities from requiring tax valuation forms but does not specify what proof they *can* require. Expect hostile municipalities to invent new, burdensome administrative forms to "verify" agricultural status.
"Indirect" Regulation: The statute prohibits "indirect" restrictions. Watch for cities attempting to bypass this law by enforcing strict "nuisance" codes (dust, odor, grass height on *private* property) to penalize operations they can no longer regulate via ROW mandates.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The bill author has informed the committee that some cities currently impose requirements on agricultural operations that interfere with generally accepted agricultural practices, including mandates relating to the maintenance of vegetation along public road rights-of-way, which can create unnecessary burdens for farmers and ranchers, especially when such requirements are unrelated to public health or safety. C.S.H.B. 4163 seeks to protect agricultural operations from overly restrictive municipal ordinances by prohibiting a city from imposing certain governmental requirements on an agricultural operation.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 4163 amends the Agriculture Code to prohibit a city from imposing a governmental requirement that directly or indirectly requires the owner or lessee of an agricultural operation to mow, bale, shred, or hoe material on the right-of-way of a public road that is adjacent to the operation. The bill applies to a governmental requirement adopted before, on, or after the bill's effective date.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 4163 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
With respect to the right-of-way to which the bill applies, the introduced specified the right-of-way of a portion of a public road, whereas the substitute omits the reference to any portion and only specifies the right-of-way of a public road. The substitute includes a provision absent from the introduced establishing that the bill applies to a governmental requirement adopted before, on, or after the bill's effective date.
HB 4163 immediately strips municipalities of the authority to force agricultural operations to maintain public rights-of-way (ROW) or to require specific tax valuations (1-d or 1-d-1) as a condition of operation. This legislation is retroactive, rendering any existing city ordinances that impose these specific burdens on farms, ranches, and timber operations null and void. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Effective immediately upon signature).
Q
Who authored HB4163?
HB4163 was authored by Texas Representative Ryan Guillen during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB4163 signed into law?
HB4163 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB4163?
HB4163 is enforced by Municipalities (restricted from enforcement) and Texas Courts (for declaratory judgment actions against non-compliant cities).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB4163?
The compliance urgency for HB4163 is rated as "low". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB4163?
The cost impact of HB4163 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB4163 address?
HB4163 addresses topics including agriculture, city government and city government--land use & zoning.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.