Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: September 1, 2025 (Statutory enactment).
Compliance Deadline:September 1, 2026 (Hard deadline for all guardians appointed prior to July 1, 2026). For new appointments after July 1, 2026, training confirmation is required 10 days prior to the hearing.
Agency Rulemaking: The Texas Supreme Court must adopt governing rules by January 1, 2026. The Judicial Branch Certification Commission (JBCC) must launch the online course by July 1, 2026.
Immediate Action Plan
Immediate: Update job descriptions for all guardian positions to include the annual dementia training requirement.
Q1 2026: Review Texas Supreme Court rules released in January to determine if your medical staff qualifies for waivers.
July 1, 2026: Designate the first week of July as "Mandatory Training Week." Direct all existing staff to complete the course immediately upon launch to avoid the September system crash.
Ongoing: Update E&O insurance renewal questionnaires to reflect full compliance with state training mandates to protect coverage eligibility.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Employment Agreements: Professional guardianship agencies must amend employment contracts to list "Maintenance of HB3376 Training Compliance" as a condition of continued employment.
Vendor MSAs: Master Service Agreements with third-party guardianship providers must include a warranty clause stating all assigned personnel are compliant with Section 155.204 of the Government Code.
Hiring/Training
Pre-Appointment Workflow: Intake teams must schedule this training immediately upon filing a guardianship application. Proof of training must be available to the court 10 days before the appointment hearing.
Annual Recertification: This is not a one-time certification. Organizations must integrate a mandatory 1-hour "Dementia Refresher" into their annual continuing education calendars for all relevant staff.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Audit Trail: Compliance officers must configure case management software (CRM) to track the "Annual Refresher Date" for every employee serving as a guardian.
Certificate Management: Establish a central repository for JBCC digital completion certificates. These must be filed with the Probate Court to prevent administrative removal from cases.
Fees & Costs
Course Fees: The law mandates the training be provided at $0 (Free).
Operational Costs: Costs are limited to administrative time for tracking and the 1-hour salary cost per employee, per year, for course completion.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
Waiver Eligibility: The Texas Supreme Court has discretion to "identify circumstances" for waivers. It is currently unclear if medical professionals (RNs, MDs) serving as guardians will be exempt. Do not assume exemptions until rules are published in January 2026.
Verification Mechanics: The statute does not specify if the JBCC will automatically transmit proof to Probate Courts or if the Guardian must manually file. Organizations should prepare for manual filing until an automated system is confirmed.
Definition of "Related Disorders": For wards under 60, the specific medical diagnoses that trigger this requirement are undefined. Agency rulemaking will likely establish specific ICD-10 codes or diagnostic criteria.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The bill author has informed the committee that as Texas' population ages, the prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease continues to increase, creating complex challenges for affected individuals, their families, and caregivers. Further, although appointed legal guardians are often tasked with caring for wards suffering from these neurological conditions, some guardians may lack sufficient knowledge to communicate effectively with or advocate for these individuals, potentially resulting in substandard care. C.S.H.B. 3376 seeks to elevate the quality of care for these individuals by requiring annual training on Alzheimers disease, dementia, and related diseases for certain appointed guardians.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Texas Supreme Court in SECTION 3 of this bill.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3376 amends the Government Code to require the Texas Supreme Court, in adopting rules for the process by which the Judicial Branch Certification Commission (JBCC) performs training for individuals seeking appointment as guardian, to require that not later than the sixth month after the date a guardian is appointed and at least once a year, the guardian completes a one-hour training course that is made available for free to guardians by the JBCC online through the JBCC website and is provided to educate guardians on Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and related disorders, including providing information about the following:
·common aspects of aging;
·warning signs of dementia and Alzheimer's disease;
·effective strategies for communicating with a person who is diagnosed with dementia or Alzheimer's disease; and
·effective strategies and resources available for supporting a person who is diagnosed with dementia or Alzheimer's disease in exercising the person's rights.
This requirement applies only to the appointment of a guardian of the person or the estate, or both, of a ward who is 60 years of age or older or is younger than 60 years of age if the ward has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, dementia, or a related disorder and is subject to the supreme court's identification of circumstances under which a court may waive guardian training requirements.
C.S.H.B. 3376 requires the supreme court, in adopting rules for the process by which the JBCC performs training and criminal history background checks for individuals seeking appointment as guardian, to ensure that a probate court is required to ensure a guardian's timely completion of the training required under the bill's provisions, unless the training is waived by the probate court.
C.S.H.B. 3376 requires the supreme court, not later than January 1, 2026, to adopt the rules required under the bill's provisions and requires the JBCC, not later than July 1, 2026, to make the course required by the bill's provisions available on the JBCC website. The bill requires a guardian appointed before July 1, 2026, who is required to complete the training required by the bill's provisions, to complete the initial required training not later than September 1, 2026.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3376 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
The substitute includes a requirement absent from the introduced for the supreme court, in adopting rules for the process by which the JBCC performs training and criminal history background checks for individuals seeking appointment as guardian, to ensure that a probate court is required to ensure a guardian's timely completion of the training required under the bill's provisions, unless the training is waived by the probate court. Accordingly, the substitute requires the supreme court to adopt rules for purposes of that requirement, whereas the introduced did not.
Whereas the introduced required the supreme court, in adopting rules for the process by which the JBCC performs training for individuals seeking appointment as guardian, to ensure that the guardian completes a three-hour annual training course designed by the JBCC to educate guardians on dementia and Alzheimer's disease within the specified timeframe, the substitute requires the supreme court in adopting those rules instead to require that the guardian complete a one-hour annual training course provided to educate guardians on Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and related disorders within that timeframe. While both the introduced and substitute require the training to provide information about effective strategies for supporting a person who is diagnosed with dementia or Alzheimer's disease in exercising the person's rights, the substitute also includes information about resources available for supporting such a person in the requirement, whereas the introduced did not. Additionally, the substitute includes a provision absent from the introduced establishing that the required training for appointed guardians under the bill's provisions applies only to the appointment of a guardian of the person or the estate, or both, of a ward who is 60 years of age or older or is younger than 60 years of age if the ward has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, dementia, or a related disorder.
With respect to the requirement that a guardian appointed before July 1, 2026, complete the bill's required initial training not later than September 1, 2026, the substitute specifies that the requirement applies to a guardian who is required to complete the training, whereas the introduced did not include that specification.
Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB3376 by Capriglione (Relating to training on dementia and Alzheimer's disease for certain guardians.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3376, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($559,942) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2026
($379,324)
2027
($180,618)
2028
($180,618)
2029
($184,158)
2030
($181,458)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2025
2026
($379,324)
2.0
2027
($180,618)
1.0
2028
($180,618)
1.0
2029
($184,158)
1.0
2030
($181,458)
1.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Government Code to require the Supreme Court of Texas to adopt rules requiring guardians to complete a training course for Dementia and Alzheimer's disease. The bill would require guardians to complete the course within six months after appointment and repeat the course each year they are assigned as a guardian. The bill would require the adoption of the rules by January, 1, 2026, and for the course to be made available by July 1, 2026. The bill would also require the training course to be made available on the court's website at no cost to an appointed guardian.
Methodology
Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration (OCA), this analysis assumes the Court would require $379,324 in General Revenue in fiscal year 2026 and $180,618 in General Revenue in fiscal year 2027 and 2.0 FTE positions to implement the provisions of the bill. This includes 1.0 full-time License and Permit Specialist and 1.0 temporary License and Permit Specialist in fiscal year 2026 for implementation and compliance of the training program. The first specialist position would be maintained in perpetuity to meet the new training requirements while the second position would ensure an estimated 60,000 existing certified guardians complete the training before the September 1, 2026, deadline. Salary costs included in these amounts would total $63,600 each fiscal year, totaling $127,200 in fiscal year 2026 and $63,600 in fiscal years 2027-2030. Benefits and payroll contributions, as well as other personnel costs included in these amounts, would total $41,658 in fiscal year 2026 and $22,869 in fiscal year 2027.
Based on information provided by OCA, this analysis also assumes the court would require $210,466 in General Revenue in fiscal year 2026 and $94,149 in General Revenue in fiscal year 2027 to develop and implement the training program on the courts website.
Technology
These costs include technology impacts of $174,292 in General Revenue in fiscal year 2026 and $76,546 in General Revenue in fiscal year 2027 to host an additional 6,000 guardians that are required to complete the online training.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, KDw, DA, JPa
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB3376 mandates annual, state-certified Alzheimer’s and dementia training for all guardians of adults over 60 or those with dementia, serving as a strict condition of appointment and retention. While the training is free, the law imposes a hard compliance deadline of September 1, 2026, for all existing guardians, creating a significant administrative bottleneck and immediate risk of disqualification for non-compliance. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: September 1, 2025 (Statutory enactment).
Q
Who authored HB3376?
HB3376 was authored by Texas Representative Giovanni Capriglione during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB3376 signed into law?
HB3376 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB3376?
HB3376 is enforced by Texas Supreme Court, Judicial Branch Certification Commission (JBCC) and Texas Probate Courts.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB3376?
The compliance urgency for HB3376 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB3376?
The cost impact of HB3376 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB3376 address?
HB3376 addresses topics including aging, health, health--other diseases & medical conditions, probate and probate--guardians & related trusts.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.