Relating to the current debt rate and tax rate of a taxing unit for ad valorem tax purposes.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2026-01-01
Enforcing Agencies
Comptroller of Public Accounts • Local Governing Bodies (School Boards, City Councils, Commissioners Courts)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: January 1, 2026
Compliance Deadline: August 2026 (First tax rate adoption cycle under new rules).
Agency Rulemaking: The Comptroller of Public Accounts must update Truth-in-Taxation forms and website posting templates prior to the 2026 tax season. Monitor the Texas Register throughout 2025 for the definition of "minimum" debt service.
Immediate Action Plan
Municipal Advisors: Immediately audit all client debt schedules to distinguish between "mandatory" payments and "planned/prepayment" allocations.
Legal Counsel: Draft template motions for the "60% supermajority vote" required to exceed the minimum debt rate.
Commercial Property Owners: Flag the August 2026 tax season for enhanced auditing; challenge any tax rate that exceeds the minimum if the specific supermajority motion is absent from the public record.
Compliance Officers: Monitor Comptroller updates for the release of revised Truth-in-Taxation worksheets in late 2025.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Municipal Engagement Letters: Law firms and financial advisors serving taxing units must amend engagement letters to include the additional scope of work required for calculating "minimum" rates and drafting specific "excess revenue" motions.
Bond Covenants: While existing covenants remain valid, the interpretation of "required" payments within those covenants will now dictate the statutory tax rate cap.
Hiring/Training
Finance Officers & Counsel: Staff responsible for tax rate calculations must be trained on the new distinction between "budgeted debt service" and "statutory minimum debt service."
Board Education: School boards and city councils require training on the new voting thresholds; a simple majority is no longer sufficient to adopt a rate that allows for debt prepayment.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Meeting Minutes: If a taxing unit seeks to collect more than the minimum, the meeting minutes must explicitly record a motion stating the purpose of the excess revenue and the specific difference in tax rates.
Website Postings: By August 7 annually, taxing units must post a debt obligation schedule reflecting the "minimum dollar amount" required, distinct from total budget figures.
Public Notices: School districts must utilize revised statutory language in the "Notice of Public Meeting to Discuss Budget and Proposed Tax Rate."
Fees & Costs
Administrative Costs: Municipalities may incur increased legal and advisory fees to ensure compliance with the stricter rate-setting formulas.
Tax Liability: Commercial property owners may realize reduced tax liabilities if taxing units fail to garner the supermajority vote required to maintain higher debt rates.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The term "minimum dollar amount required" is the primary area of regulatory risk.
Variable Rate Debt: It is unclear if the Comptroller will allow "minimum" calculations to include buffers for interest rate fluctuations.
Coverage Ratios: It is undefined whether "required" includes maintaining debt service coverage ratios mandated by bond covenants or strictly the principal/interest payment.
Risk: A narrow interpretation by the Comptroller could technically force a taxing unit into a position where they under-collect revenue, risking default. We must engage in the rulemaking process to ensure "minimum" includes contractual safety margins.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The Interest and Sinking (I&S) tax rate declines as the total amount of debt outstanding from issuances is paid off over time.
However, the governing bodies of some taxing units elect to retire debt earlier than required. These decisions require that the taxing unit's I&S tax rate be set higher than otherwise would be required. This leads taxpayers to pay higher tax bills than they otherwise would.
S.B. 1453 seeks to amend the definition of "current debt" for purposes of calculating an I&S tax rate, to include only the minimum amount required by the bond issuances' schedules.
S.B. 1453 does permit a taxing entity to adopt an I&S rate higher than the minimum tax rate if there is a motion that:
States what the minimum I&S tax rate would be,
States the proposed rate,
States the difference between the minimum and proposed I&S tax rates,
Describes the purpose for which the excess collected from the proposed rate will be used, and
The motion is approved by at least 60 percent of the members of the governing body.
As proposed, S.B. 1453 amends current law relating to the current debt rate and tax rate of a taxing unit for ad valorem tax purposes.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Section 44.004(c), Education Code, as follows:
(c) Requires that the notice of public meeting to discuss and adopt the budget and the proposed tax rate, subject to Subsection (d) (relating to the requirement that the language of the notice substantially conform to the language and format prescribed by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas (comptroller)) to contain certain sections, including a section entitled "Comparison of Proposed Rates with Last Year's Rates," which is required to show in rows certain tax rates, expressed as amounts per $100 valuation of property, for columns entitled "Maintenance & Operations," "Interest & Sinking Fund," and "Total," which is the sum of "Maintenance & Operations" and "Interest & Sinking Fund," including the "Rate to Maintain Same Level of Maintenance & Operations Revenue & Pay Debt Service," which, in the case of "Interest & Sinking Fund," is the tax rate that, when applied to the current taxable value for the district, as certified by the chief appraiser under Section 26.01 (Submission of Rolls to Taxing Units), Tax Code, and as adjusted and multiplied in a certain manner, would impose taxes in an amount that, when added to certain funds and taxes would provide the minimum dollar amount required to be paid to service the district's debt.
SECTION 3. Amends Section 26.04(e), Tax Code, as follows:
(e) Requires the designated officer or employee to post prominently on the home page of the taxing unit's Internet website in the form prescribed by the comptroller certain information, including a schedule of the taxing unit's debt obligations showing the minimum dollar amount of principal and interest required to be paid, rather than the amount of principal and interest that will be paid, to service the taxing unit's debts in the next year from property tax revenue, including certain payments.
SECTION 4. Amends Section 26.05, Tax Code, by adding Subsections (a-1) and (a-2), as follows:
(a-1) Provides that the governing body of a taxing unit is authorized to approve a rate described by Subsection (a)(1) (relating to one component of tax rate calculations for a taxing unit other than a school district) that exceeds the rate for the taxing unit as determined under Subsection (a) (relating to the two components of a tax rate a governing body of each tax unit is required to calculate) only if:
(1)� the rate is proposed to be approved by a motion that states the rate determined under Subsection (a)(1), states the proposed rate, states the difference between the proposed rate and the rate determined under Subsection (a)(1), and describes the purpose for which the excess revenue collected from the proposed rate will be used; and
(2)� the motion is approved by at least 60 percent of the members of the governing body.
(a-2)� Provides that, if the governing body of a taxing unit approves a rate described by Subsection (a)(1) under Subsection (a-1) for a tax year, the rate approved under Subsection (a-1) is considered to be the current debt rate of the taxing unit for that tax year.� Requires the officer or employee designated by the governing body to calculate the voter-approval tax rate of the taxing unit under Chapter 26 (Assessment) to recalculate that rate to account for the new current debt rate, and that recalculated voter-approval tax rate is considered to be the voter-approval tax rate of the taxing unit for that tax year.
SECTION 5.� Makes application of this Act prospective.
Honorable Paul Bettencourt, Chair, Senate Committee on Local Government
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB1453 by Bettencourt (Relating to the current debt rate and tax rate of a taxing unit for ad valorem tax purposes.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would define current debt service (for the purpose of calculating the current debt rate of a taxing unit) as meaning the minimum dollar amount required to be expended for debt service for the current year.
The bill would add requirements concerning the governing body of a taxing unit and the conditions needed to approve a debt tax rate that exceeds the minimum debt tax rate for the taxing unit. If such a debt rate were to be adopted, the designated officer or employee would recalculate the voter-approval tax rate to account for the new current debt rate for that year.
The bill would amend a current law definition which now reads, “Current debt means debt service for the current year.” The result could be to require some taxing units to adopt a lower tax rate, and to continue payments of debt for a longer period, than they would under current law.
Local Government Impact
The bill could result in some taxing units being required to adopt a lower tax rate, and to continue payments of debt for a longer period, than they would under current law.
Source Agencies: b > td >
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, SZ, SD, BRI
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
SB1453 fundamentally restricts how local taxing units calculate property tax debt rates, mandating the use of the "minimum dollar amount required" for debt service rather than higher planned expenditures. This legislation prevents taxing units from collecting excess revenue to prepay debt without a specific public motion and a 60% supermajority vote. While this offers potential tax relief for commercial property owners, it demands an immediate overhaul of rate-setting methodologies for municipal finance advisors and bond counsel.
Q
Who authored SB1453?
SB1453 was authored by Texas Senator Paul Bettencourt during the Regular Session.
Q
When was SB1453 signed into law?
SB1453 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce SB1453?
SB1453 is enforced by Comptroller of Public Accounts and Local Governing Bodies (School Boards, City Councils, Commissioners Courts).
Q
How urgent is compliance with SB1453?
The compliance urgency for SB1453 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of SB1453?
The cost impact of SB1453 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does SB1453 address?
SB1453 addresses topics including taxation, taxation--property-assessment & collection and taxation--property-tax rate.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.