Relating to the procedure for the dissolution of the Cedar Creek Hospital District and the disposition of district money.
LowStandard timeline
Low Cost
Effective:2025-05-24
Enforcing Agencies
County Judges (Kaufman, Van Zandt, Henderson) • Commissioners Courts (Kaufman, Van Zandt, Henderson) • Scholarship Oversight Committee
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: May 24, 2025 (Immediate effect).
Compliance Deadline: The dissolution order must be entered by Commissioners Courts not later than the 10th day after election results confirm the district's dissolution.
Agency Rulemaking: The "Joint Oversight Committee" (comprised of the three counties) must draft eligibility and disbursement rules immediately following a successful election. There is no statutory deadline for these rules, creating a potential delay in fund availability.
Immediate Action Plan
County Legal Counsel: Immediately draft a template ILA for the Joint Oversight Committee to prevent administrative gridlock post-election.
County Judges: Schedule the joint meeting required to order the special election; ensure ballot language matches the strict statutory requirement in Section 2(d).
Healthcare Executives: Contact the County Judges' offices to advocate for industry representation on the Oversight Committee to ensure scholarship criteria match current clinical needs.
Finance Directors: Audit any remaining Cedar Creek Hospital District accounts to ensure zero outstanding debt exists, as debt is a statutory bar to dissolution.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Interlocal Agreements (ILAs): Kaufman, Van Zandt, and Henderson Counties must draft and execute ILAs to govern the formation, composition, and authority of the Joint Oversight Committee.
Educational MOUs: The Oversight Committee will require Memorandums of Understanding with Higher Education institutions to facilitate direct tuition disbursements or student verification processes.
Hiring/Training
Workforce Pipeline: Local healthcare providers should anticipate a new, localized funding stream for nursing candidates. HR Directors in the tri-county area should align recruitment strategies with the scholarship's residency requirements.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Dissolution Orders: County Clerks must record the specific order dissolving the district within the 10-day statutory window.
Residency Verification: The Oversight Committee must establish a verification protocol to prove scholarship applicants reside within the *historical* boundaries of the dissolved district, requiring access to archived district maps.
Fees & Costs
Election Costs: The three counties must budget for the administration of the special election.
Asset Transfer: Finance departments must segregate Cedar Creek Hospital District assets and prepare for an equal three-way split upon dissolution.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The legislation mandates the creation of a "Joint Oversight Committee" but fails to define:
1.Committee Composition: The text does not specify the number of appointees per county or the required qualifications of committee members.
2.Fund Custody: It is unclear whether the counties will hold the funds in trust or if the Committee will operate as a separate fiscal entity.
3."Administering" the Scholarship: The law does not define if funds must be paid to the school or the student, leaving this to the discretion of the new Committee.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
In 1973, the Texas Legislature created the Mabank-Kemp Hospital District, which was renamed in 1977 as the Cedar Creek Hospital District. The author has informed the committee that local businessman Andrew Gibbs, longtime president of the Trinity Valley Community College Board of Trustees, was essential in establishing the district and raising funds to ensure its financial stability. In 1999, the legislature enacted legislation that created a process by which the district's board of directors could order an election on the question of dissolving the district and disposing of the district's assets and obligations. However, the author has also informed the committee that since the passage of that legislation, all of the district's board members have either resigned or passed away, and there is no process in place by which the district can be dissolved. With no current board members, no one is legally authorized to access the district's funds or order an election to dissolve the district. H.B. 467 seeks to address this issue by authorizing the county judges of Kaufman, Henderson, and Van Zandt Counties to order an election regarding the district's dissolution and, if the proposition is approved, to access the district's funds for the purpose of establishing and administering the "Andrew Gibbs Memorial Nursing Scholarship."
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 467 amends Chapter 22, Acts of the 63rd Legislature, Regular Session, 1973, to establish a procedure for the dissolution of the Cedar Creek Hospital District and the disposition of district money if dissolved. The bill authorizes the district to be dissolved as provided by the bill only if the following conditions are met:
·the district is not providing or paying for the provision of medical or hospital care;
·all positions on the district's board of directors are vacant;
·the district has no outstanding indebtedness; and
·the only remaining asset of the district is money.
The bill authorizes the county judges of Kaufman, Van Zandt, and Henderson Counties to jointly agree to order an election on the question of dissolving the district and using any remaining district money to establish and administer the Andrew Gibbs Memorial Nursing Scholarship. The bill makes Election Code provisions relating to uniform election dates inapplicable to such an election and prescribes the required ballot language.
H.B. 467 prohibits the county judges of Kaufman, Van Zandt, and Henderson Counties from taking any additional action under the bill if a majority of the votes cast in the election do not favor the proposition. However, the bill requires the county judges and commissioners courts of those counties to take the following action if a majority of the votes cast in the election do favor the proposition:
·the county judges must find that the district is dissolved and transfer the district money in equal shares to Kaufman, Van Zandt, and Henderson Counties for the purpose of establishing and administering the Andrew Gibbs Memorial Nursing Scholarship; and
·the commissioners courts must enter orders dissolving the district not later than the 10th day after the date the commissioners courts determine that the county judges' requirements have been met.
H.B. 467 requires the county judges of Kaufman, Van Zandt, and Henderson Counties to use the money transferred on dissolution of the district to jointly establish and administer the Andrew Gibbs Memorial Nursing Scholarship. The bill requires the counties to jointly establish an oversight committee to administer the scholarship and authorizes the committee to establish eligibility criteria and procedures for the application and selection process, provided that the eligibility criteria must require an individual receiving a scholarship to do the following:
·reside in the boundaries of the district, as those boundaries existed on the date of the election on the dissolution of the district, at the time the individual is accepted for admission to a nursing education program at an institution of higher education in Texas; and
·be currently enrolled in, or have been accepted for admission to, such a nursing education program.
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2025.
Honorable Cecil Bell, Chair, House Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB467 by Bell, Keith (Relating to the procedure for the dissolution of the Cedar Creek Hospital District and the disposition of district money.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
Local Government Impact
There could be an impact on Kaufman, Van Zandt, and Henderson Counties if any money is transferred to the Andrew Gibbs Memorial Nursing Scholarship after the dissolution of the Cedar Creek Hospital District.
Source Agencies: b > td >
307 Secretary of State
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, SZ, BC, CWi
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB467 mandates the dissolution of the Cedar Creek Hospital District via a special election, redirecting its residual assets to the newly created Andrew Gibbs Memorial Nursing Scholarship. This legislation strictly impacts Kaufman, Van Zandt, and Henderson Counties, requiring these local governments to execute Interlocal Agreements to manage the liquidation of assets and the administration of new workforce development funds. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: May 24, 2025 (Immediate effect).
Q
Who authored HB467?
HB467 was authored by Texas Representative Keith Bell during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB467 signed into law?
HB467 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 24, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB467?
HB467 is enforced by County Judges (Kaufman, Van Zandt, Henderson), Commissioners Courts (Kaufman, Van Zandt, Henderson) and Scholarship Oversight Committee.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB467?
The compliance urgency for HB467 is rated as "low". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB467?
The cost impact of HB467 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB467 address?
HB467 addresses topics including hospitals, special districts & authorities, special districts & authorities--hospital and cedar creek hospital district.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.