Relating to the procedures and practices of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department regarding grievances submitted by department employees and former department employees and to the eligibility of a person to be appointed to the department's release review panel and the authority of a panel member.
LowStandard timeline
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Juvenile Justice Department
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date:June 20, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote; supersedes the September 1 date listed in the bill text).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. Panel composition and conflict checks must align with the statute for any hearing convened on or after June 20, 2025.
Agency Rulemaking: TJJD must adopt new grievance procedures "as soon as practicable." Expect a regulatory gray zone between June 20 and the publication of new rules where the right to mediation is statutorily gone, but the new grievance process is not yet codified.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Update Defense Protocols: Instruct legal counsel to remove dismissal mediation from administrative remedy workflows immediately.
2.Implement Conflict Checks: Establish a "prior contact" verification step for all release review panel members to ensure they have no supervisory history with the juvenile in question.
3.Review Staffing SLAs: Audit contracts with TJJD to identify and strike outdated references to mediation timelines.
4.Monitor Texas Register: Assign a compliance officer to watch for emergency TJJD rules defining "supervisory decision" to mitigate litigation risk.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
HR & Staffing Vendors: If your Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with TJJD include timelines for "independent dismissal mediation," these terms are now void. You must amend contracts to reflect the streamlined grievance process.
Legal Retainers: Outside counsel representing state employees must revise engagement letters and defense strategies to account for the removal of the mediation phase in termination disputes.
Hiring/Training
Release Panelists: Training is required immediately for new panelists drawn from outside the central office. They must be trained on the new statutory prohibition against ruling on any child for whom they have previously made a "supervisory decision."
Competitive Benchmarking: Private juvenile facility operators should note that state JCOs may now elect a 40-hour lump sum vacation payout annually starting FY 2026. Review your retention benefits to ensure you remain competitive with this increased liquidity in state compensation.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Conflict of Interest Logs: You must implement a mandatory cross-reference check for every release panel member against the specific juvenile’s supervision history. Document that the panelist has never issued a disciplinary or supervisory directive regarding that detainee.
Leave Election Forms: Payroll administrators for the department must create election forms for the 40-hour leave buy-back program prior to the start of Fiscal Year 2026.
Fees & Costs
Litigation Costs: Expect a potential increase in Employment Practices Liability (EPLI) claims. The removal of the mediation "cooling off" period may lead to a higher volume of immediate wrongful termination lawsuits.
Budget Impact: While no new fees are levied on business, the state has allocated up to $2.3M for leave payouts; contractors should anticipate no pass-through costs but should monitor for indirect budget tightening in other areas.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
Definition of "Supervisory Decision": The statute prohibits a panelist from ruling on a child if they made a "supervisory decision" regarding them. The law does not define this term. Does a minor verbal correction count, or only formal disciplinary write-ups? Until TJJD defines this via rule, this is a high-risk vector for appealing release denials.
Panel "Objectivity": The Executive Director is mandated to adopt policies ensuring "transparency, consistency, and objectivity." These are subjective legal standards that will remain vague until specific scoring rubrics or composition rules are published.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD), in its agency strategic plan, has identified several statutory barriers that limit its ability to manage personnel effectively and maintain safe, well-staffed facilities. Some of the issues identified in this plan include the ability for juvenile correctional officers to receive compensation for unused vacation leave, the makeup of the release review panel, and the statutory requirement for independent dismissal mediation. H.B. 4263 seeks to address these issues by revising applicable statutory provisions to give TJJD greater operational flexibility and to improve workforce retention and decision-making processes.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
H.B. 4263 amends the Human Resources Code to replace the requirement for the Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) to establish procedures and practices governing disciplinary actions within TJJD, including a procedure allowing a TJJD employee to elect to participate in an independent dismissal mediation if the employee is recommended for dismissal, with a requirement for TJJD to establish procedures and practices governing grievances challenging disciplinary termination of employment. The bill requires TJJD to establish those procedures and practices as soon as practicable after the bill's effective date.
H.B. 4263 requires TJJD to adopt a policy allowing juvenile correctional officers, defined by reference as TJJD employees whose primary duties include the custodial supervision of children in TJJD custody, one time during a fiscal year, to elect to receive a lump-sum payment for the officer's accumulated vacation leave in lieu of taking the leave. The bill caps the number of hours of accumulated vacation leave for which a juvenile correctional officer may be paid under such a policy at 40 hours of accumulated vacation leave or all of the officer's accumulated vacation leave, whichever is less. The bill requires TJJD, if it pays a juvenile correctional officer for the officer's accumulated vacation leave under the policy, to do the following:
·compute the amount of the payment by multiplying the officer's hourly rate of compensation on the date the officer notifies TJJD of an election by the number of hours of accumulated vacation leave for which the officer elects to be paid; and
·on making the payment, deduct the number of hours for which the officer received payment from the officer's accumulated vacation leave balance.
H.B. 4263 revises the criteria relating to the membership of a panel for reviewing and determining whether a child who has completed the child's minimum length of stay should be discharged from the custody of TJJD, be released under supervision, or remain in TJJD custody for an additional period of time as follows:
·removes the requirement that a TJJD employee who is appointed to the panel be an employee who works at TJJD's central office; and
·clarifies that the prohibition against a member of the panel being involved in any supervisory decisions concerning children in TJJD custody applies with respect to any determination relating to the release of a juvenile from a secure facility concerning a child in TJJD custody for whom that panel member has made a supervisory decision.
Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB4263 by Cook (Relating to the employment practices of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department and to the eligibility of a person to be appointed to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department's release review panel and the authority of a panel member.), As Introduced
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the unknown number of Juvenile Correctional Officers that may elect to take a lump sum payment in lieu of using accrued leave.
The bill would require the Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) to adopt a policy that would allow Juvenile Correctional Officers (JCOs) to elect to receive a one-time lump sum payment once per fiscal year in lieu of using accumulated leave. The amount of leave may not exceed 40 hours.
According to TJJD, the average number of accrued leave for direct care staff including JCOs is 147 hours and the maximum fiscal impact should every JCO opt for the lump sum would be approximately $2,300,000 per fiscal year. However, the number of JCOs that may elect to take a lump sum payment in lieu of using accrued leave is unknown, therefore the exact fiscal impact on the agency cannot be determined.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, MGol, CSh, AF
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB4263 takes effect immediately on June 20, 2025, eliminating the statutory requirement for independent dismissal mediation for Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) employees and expanding the eligibility pool for release review panels. This legislation alters the legal defense landscape for employment disputes and necessitates immediate updates to conflict-of-interest protocols for release hearings to prevent procedural challenges. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote; supersedes the September 1 date listed in the bill text).
Q
Who authored HB4263?
HB4263 was authored by Texas Representative David Cook during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB4263 signed into law?
HB4263 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB4263?
HB4263 is enforced by Texas Juvenile Justice Department.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB4263?
The compliance urgency for HB4263 is rated as "low". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB4263?
The cost impact of HB4263 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB4263 address?
HB4263 addresses topics including corrections, corrections--jails & prisons, crimes, crimes--juvenile and family.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.