Relating to a peer support network for first responders.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-20
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) • Texas Commission on Fire Protection (TCFP) • Department of State Health Services (DSHS)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Per Extracted Data; immediate effect implies 2/3 legislative vote was achieved).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. You must cease any disciplinary actions based on peer support participation as of the effective date.
Agency Rulemaking: The Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) has until March 31, 2026, to fully develop network protocols, training standards, and mental health provider vetting. Expect a "regulatory gray zone" between now and March 2026 where protections exist, but the state network is not yet operational.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Update Disciplinary Matrix: Immediately revise HR policies to explicitly state that seeking peer support is a protected activity and cannot be grounds for adverse action.
2.Establish "Safety Removal" Protocols: Create a clear SOP distinguishing between a non-punitive removal from duty (for safety) and disciplinary suspension.
3.Monitor Appropriations: Confirm if the specific funding for HB35 is signed into the budget to determine if the state network will actually launch by 2026.
4.Audit EAP Providers: Contact your current mental health vendors to prepare them for potential integration with the state network.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Employment Agreements: Review "Code of Conduct" and "Termination for Cause" clauses. Explicitly exclude state-sanctioned peer support participation from definitions of "conduct unbecoming" or "instability."
Vendor Agreements (EAP): If you contract with an external Employee Assistance Program (EAP), amend the scope of work to ensure their counselors meet the forthcoming vetting standards set by TDEM/TSU to ensure continuity of care.
Hiring/Training
Management Training: Operations Managers and HR staff must be retrained immediately. They must understand that referring an employee to the network is a protected activity.
Disciplinary Boards: Institute a mandatory "stop-check" in all disciplinary proceedings to verify that evidence is not derived from confidential peer support interactions.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Data Segregation: You must establish a "Confidentiality Firewall." If your organization receives data regarding an employee's network participation (e.g., for scheduling), this data must be segregated from the standard personnel file and treated with higher security than standard HIPAA data.
No Employer Reporting: You are *not* required to report employee usage to the state; the burden of reporting lies with TDEM.
Fees & Costs
Budget Impact: Low direct costs.
Indirect Costs: Potential increase in paid administrative leave. You may need to place an employee on paid leave for "safety" reasons while they utilize the network, rather than unpaid suspension, to avoid the appearance of retaliation.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
Agency Jurisdiction (TDEM vs. TSU): The statutory text assigns authority to TDEM, but the Fiscal Note explicitly details transferring the program to Texas Southern University (TSU). Expect operational guidance and training to come from TSU, while legal notices will cite TDEM authority.
"Discipline" vs. "Safety Removal": The law forbids "disciplinary action" but does not define the threshold for removing an employee from a shift for immediate safety concerns arising from a mental health crisis. Agencies must define where "safety removal" ends and "punitive suspension" begins.
Funding Contingency: Section 5 is a "poison pill"—implementation is contingent on specific legislative appropriation. If the legislature fails to fund the network, the *program* may stall, but the *legal protections* against discipline likely remain in force as public policy.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
The bill author has informed the committee that regular exposure to traumatic events such as shootings, automobile accidents, or house fires can lead to complex mental health conditions for first responders, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, at rates as high as 5 to 10 times that of the general population. According to the Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, in 2019, the number of law enforcement officers who died by suicide across the U.S., 228, was nearly double the number of officers killed in the line of duty, 132. Tragically, that organization also reports that Texas recorded the highest number of law enforcement officer suicides in 2022. Additionally, a 2018 report on first responder mental health by the Ruderman Family Foundation found that firefighters die by suicide at an even higher rate than their law enforcement counterparts, with 18 per 100,000 firefighters dying by suicide and 17 law enforcement officers per 100,000 dying by suicide. The CDC also found that emergency medical services personnel were 1.39 times more likely than the public to die by suicide. Although there are no official statistics maintained for these rates in Texas, these data demonstrate that all first responders are confronting a mental health crisis.
In 2021, the 87th Texas Legislature addressed law enforcement suicides by passing S.B. 64, creating a peer support network for law enforcement officers through the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement. The bill author has informed the committee that the increased access to trained peer support provided by the network has measurably reduced the number of law enforcement officers that die by suicide, and, as a result, should be replicated to provide this support to firefighters and emergency management services personnel. C.S.H.B. 35 seeks to address this issue by requiring the establishment of a first responder peer support network.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 35 amends the Government Code to require the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) to develop a first responder peer support network that includes the following:
·peer-to-peer support;
·training for peer service coordinators and peers that includes suicide prevention training;
·technical assistance for program development, peer service coordinators, licensed mental health professionals, and peers; and
·identification, retention, and screening of licensed mental health professionals.
The bill establishes that TDEM, as part of the network, is required to ensure first responders have support in both urban and rural jurisdictions through the establishment of regional peer support hubs and may establish a program to connect first responders with clinical resources at no cost to the first responders. The bill requires TDEM to solicit and ensure that specialized training is provided to persons who are peers and who want to provide peer-to-peer support and other peer-to-peer services under the network.
C.S.H.B. 35 establishes that information relating to a first responder's participation in peer-to-peer support and other peer-to-peer services under the network is confidential and not subject to disclosure under state public information law. The bill requires TDEM, not later than December 1 of each year, to submit a report to the governor and the legislature that includes the following information:
·the number of first responders who received peer support through the network;
·the number of peers and peer service coordinators trained, including the number of active peers and coordinators and the retention rate of peers and coordinators;
·the number of vacant regional director positions and the average length of time each position has been vacant;
·the number and types of community engagement events and outreach activities hosted by the network to promote first responder awareness and use of the network;
·the number of critical incident responses and wellness interventions facilitated by the network;
·an evaluation of the services provided; and
·recommendations for program improvements.
C.S.H.B. 35 prohibits the Texas Commission on Fire Protection (TCFP) from taking disciplinary action against a regulated person based on the person's participation in peer-to-peer support and other peer-to-peer services and from considering the person's participation during any disciplinary proceeding under statutory provisions governing TCFP.
C.S.H.B. 35 amends the Health and Safety Code to prohibit the Department of State Health Services from taking disciplinary action against emergency medical services personnel based on their participation in peer-to-peer support and other peer-to-peer services and from considering their participation during any disciplinary proceeding under the Emergency Health Care Act.
C.S.H.B. 35 defines the following terms:
·"emergency medical services personnel" by reference to its meaning assigned by the Emergency Health Care Act;
·"firefighter" as a firefighter who is a permanent, paid employee of the fire department of a political subdivision, excluding a volunteer firefighter;
·"first responder" as emergency medical services personnel or a firefighter; and
·"peer" as a person who is a first responder or retired first responder.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 35 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
The introduced and the substitute both require the development of a first responder peer support network but differ in the following ways:
·whereas the introduced transferred existing statutory provisions relating to a law enforcement officer peer support network developed by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement (TCOLE) to existing statutory provisions governing the Texas Southern University (TSU) and expanded the scope of those provisions by making them applicable also with respect to a firefighter and emergency services personnel, the substitute adds new provisions relating to a first responder peer support network to the Texas Disaster Act of 1975, applicable only with respect to a firefighter and emergency services personnel, and does not revise existing statutory provisions relating to a law enforcement officer peer support network;
·accordingly, the introduced removed a statutory provision authorizing TCOLE to adopt rules to implement a law enforcement officer peer support network, whereas the substitute does not; and
·whereas the introduced replaced TCOLE with TSU as the entity responsible for developing and performing other duties with respect to the network, the substitute designates TDEM as the entity responsible for developing the network and those same duties.
The substitute omits the provision from the introduced that replaced the prohibition against a law enforcement officer's participation in peer-to-peer support and other peer-to-peer services under the network serving as the basis for a revocation, suspension, or denial of a law enforcement officer license or being considered in any proceeding related to the officer's licensure under applicable state law with a prohibition against TCOLE taking disciplinary action against an officer based on that participation and considering the officer's participation during any disciplinary proceeding under that law.
Whereas the introduced repealed the provision authorizing TCOLE to contract with an institution of higher education that has appropriate expertise in mental health or law enforcement to develop the law enforcement officer peer support network, the substitute does not repeal this provision.
Honorable Gary VanDeaver, Chair, House Committee on Public Health
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB35 by Thompson (Relating to a peer support network for first responders.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB35, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($3,950,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2026
($1,975,000)
2027
($1,975,000)
2028
($1,975,000)
2029
($1,975,000)
2030
($1,975,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable (Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1
2026
($1,975,000)
2027
($1,975,000)
2028
($1,975,000)
2029
($1,975,000)
2030
($1,975,000)
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would transfer the peer support network for law enforcement officers program from the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement to Texas Southern University and reestablish it as a first responder peer support network. The program would establish regional support hubs and connect first responders with clinical resources at no cost to the first responders. The network would require Texas Southern University to develop: (1) peer-to-peer support; (2) training for peer service coordinators and peers that includes suicide prevention training; (3) technical assistance for program development, peer service coordinators, licensed mental health professionals and peers; and (4) identification, retention, and screening of licensed mental health professionals.
Additionally, the bill would require an annual report from Texas Southern University on certain information specified in the bill's provisions.
Methodology
The program is currently at the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement (TCOLE), which contracts with University of North Texas at Dallas, and is funded at $1.2 million per fiscal year. Texas Southern University estimates a cost of approximately $3.2 million per fiscal year to establish and operate the expanded program. This cost, partially offset by the savings at TCOLE, would result in a net cost of approximately $2.0 million per fiscal year.
Texas Southern University expects to continue the current model of a state director and co-director as well as the eight-region format with one regional director each. However, Texas Southern University would propose an increase to 19.0 FTEs for the program by adding a co-director for each region to assist the director in recruiting peer volunteers, facilitating the training, informing the first responder community in their respective regions about available resources, and assisting first responders in connecting with resource providers.
Technology
Texas Southern University models the following technology costs, included in their estimate:
(1) $5,000 per FTE initial technology start-up costs;
(2) Provisioning mobile phones and services for state (2) and regional (16) directors and co-directors at $110 per phone;
(3) Maintaining the website of service providers at $10,000 per year;
(4) Maintaining iOS/Android application at $200 per month; and
(5) $250,000 per fiscal year to accommodate the technology needs of the statewide peer network program.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 411 Commission on Fire Protection, 537 State Health Services, Department of, 717 Texas Southern University
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, NPe, LBO, CBR, NV
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
HB35 establishes a state-sanctioned Peer Support Network for first responders and, critically, creates a statutory shield against disciplinary action for employees utilizing these services. Effective immediately, private EMS agencies, fire departments, and hospital-based transport services must separate "participation in peer support" from "fitness for duty" evaluations to avoid wrongful termination liability. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: June 20, 2025 (Per Extracted Data; immediate effect implies 2/3 legislative vote was achieved).
Q
Who authored HB35?
HB35 was authored by Texas Representative Senfronia Thompson during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB35 signed into law?
HB35 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 20, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB35?
HB35 is enforced by Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM), Texas Commission on Fire Protection (TCFP) and Department of State Health Services (DSHS).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB35?
The compliance urgency for HB35 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB35?
The cost impact of HB35 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB35 address?
HB35 addresses topics including disaster preparedness & relief, education, education--higher, education--higher--institutions & programs and fire fighters & police.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.