Relating to the evaluation and reporting of investment practices and performance of certain public retirement systems.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-05-29
Enforcing Agencies
State Pension Review Board
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date:May 29, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. Systems must assess their TPL immediately to determine if they have triggered the 3-year cycle.
Agency Rulemaking: The PRB must publish the official schedule of deadlines by January 1, 2026.
*Regulatory Gray Zone:* Between now and Jan 1, 2026, systems crossing the $100M TPL threshold exist in a compliance gap. You must assume the accelerated schedule applies to you immediately.
Immediate Action Plan
Calculate TPL Now: Do not wait for the fiscal year-end. Obtain your current Total Pension Liability figure to determine if you have crossed the $100M threshold.
Audit Vendor Contracts: Issue contract amendments to independent firms to remove repealed statutory timelines and reference the forthcoming PRB schedule.
Update Compliance Calendars: If your TPL is >$100M, move your next IPPE placeholder from Year 6 to Year 3.
Prepare Response Protocols: Establish an internal workflow to draft the "Management Response" to recommendations concurrently with the review of the draft report to meet the 31-day filing window.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Review Master Services Agreements (MSAs) with independent evaluators immediately.
Remove: Clauses referencing the specific statutory 30-day or 60-day review windows for draft reports, as these statutes have been repealed.
Insert: Language requiring deliverables to align with "the schedule of deadlines prescribed by the State Pension Review Board."
Scope: Ensure the Scope of Work explicitly requires the vendor to submit a "substantially completed draft" for discussion prior to the final report, as strictly required by Subsection (e-1).
Hiring/Training
Board Education: Trustees must be briefed that "Assets under Management" is no longer the sole determinant for evaluation frequency.
Actuarial Coordination: Staff must coordinate with actuaries to ensure GASB 68 TPL figures are finalized and reported to the compliance team immediately upon calculation to assess evaluation triggers.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
New Filing Deadline: The governing body must submit the final report to the PRB no later than the 31st day after receiving it from the independent firm.
Mandatory Response: The final filing *must* include a description of any action taken or expected to be taken in response to the evaluator's recommendations. This is a statutory requirement, not an optional addendum.
"Sticky" Jurisdiction: Document your status carefully. Once a system triggers a requirement (e.g., the 3-year cycle), it remains subject to that requirement until *both* total assets and TPL decrease below the threshold.
Fees & Costs
Budget Impact: Systems with assets under $100M but TPL over $100M will see consulting costs double over a 6-year period, as they move from a 6-year cycle to a 3-year cycle.
No State Fees: There are no new filing fees payable to the State.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
The "Appropriate Deadline" Definition:
Subsection (d-1) mandates that if a system moves from the 6-year to the 3-year track, they must complete the evaluation by the "next appropriate deadline." The law does not define "appropriate."
*Risk:* The PRB could interpret this to mean the *immediate next* deadline, potentially forcing an unbudgeted evaluation within months.
*Watch Item:* Monitor PRB meeting agendas closely between now and Jan 1, 2026, for the definition of transition timelines.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Current state law requires certain public retirement systems in Texas to select an independent firm to complete an investment practices and performance evaluation (IPPE) to assess the system's investment practices and performance and make recommendations regarding areas for improvement. The law specifically requires retirement systems with total assets of at least $100 million to conduct the evaluation every three years and retirement systems with total assets between $30 million and $100 million to do so every six years. In its 2024 Investment Performance Report, the Pension Review Board (PRB) recommended that the legislature update and clarify several requirements regarding IPPE reports regarding applicability and reporting timelines to improve consistency and predictability for retirement systems and the PRB. C.S.H.B. 3474 seeks to implement these recommendations by requiring the PRB to develop a schedule of deadlines for conducting IPPE evaluations consistent with current law and clarifying the criteria that subjects systems to certain evaluation requirements.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3474 amends the Government Code to specify that the statutory requirement for a public retirement system to conduct an evaluation on the appropriateness, adequacy, and effectiveness of the system's investment practices and performance at certain times based on a system's total assets is in accordance with a schedule of deadlines prescribed by the Pension Review Board (PRB). The bill requires the PRB to develop that schedule of deadlines not later than January 1, 2026. With respect to the statutorily-prescribed schedule, the bill changes the point at which the amount of a system's total assets is identified for purposes of determining the frequency with which the system must conduct the evaluation, as follows:
·for evaluations required once every three years, from total assets being at least $100 million as of the last day of the preceding fiscal year to total assets being at least that amount as of the date of the preceding evaluation; and
·for evaluations required once every six years, from total assets being at least $30 million and less than $100 million as of the last day of the preceding fiscal year to total assets being such an amount as of the date of the preceding evaluation.
The bill requires a public retirement system that is conducting evaluations every six years in accordance with those provisions and whose total pension liability increases to at least $100 million during a fiscal year to complete the next evaluation by the next appropriate deadline, as determined by the PRB, under the evaluation schedule. The bill establishes that a public retirement system subject to a statutorily-prescribed evaluation requirement remains subject to that same requirement unless both the total assets and the total pension liability of the system decrease to an amount that is below the minimum amount prescribed by the applicable requirement.
C.S.H.B. 3474 changes the condition under which a public retirement system is not required to conduct an evaluation from the system's total assets being less than $30 million as of the last day of the preceding fiscal year to the system's total assets being less than that amount as of the last day of the fiscal year immediately preceding the next evaluation deadline under the evaluation schedule. The bill removes the filing periods and deadlines prescribed for the following requirements:
·the requirement for an independent firm that completes an evaluation to submit a substantially completed draft of the evaluation report to the applicable system and to request the system to submit certain response information by a certain deadline, which is also removed by the bill;
·the requirement for the firm to file the final evaluation report with the system's governing body; and
·the requirement for the governing body of a public retirement system that receives a final evaluation report to submit the report to the PRB.
With respect to that requirement for an applicable firm to submit a substantially completed draft of the evaluation report, the bill removes the specification that the draft be a preliminary draft.
C.S.H.B. 3474 defines the following terms:
·"evaluation schedule" as the schedule of deadlines prescribed by the PRB under certain provisions relating to investment practices and performance reports; and
·"total pension liability" as the portion of the present value of projected retirement benefit payments to be provided through the retirement system to active and inactive members that is attributable to those members' past periods of service, in compliance with Statement No. 68 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3474 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
With respect to the requirement that a public retirement system conduct an evaluation on the appropriateness, adequacy, and effectiveness of the system's investment practices and performance at certain times based on a system's total assets, the substitute specifies that the evaluation be conducted in accordance with a schedule of deadlines prescribed by the PRB, whereas the introduced required the PRB to establish a schedule to ensure that a system conduct the evaluation at the statutorily-prescribed times.
Both the introduced and the substitute changed the point at which the amount of a system's total assets is identified for purposes of determining the frequency with which a system must conduct an evaluation. However, the substitute specifies that a system's total assets are identified as of the date of the preceding evaluation, whereas the introduced removed the specification that those assets are identified as of the last day of the preceding fiscal year.
Both the introduced and the substitute require certain public retirement systems to complete the next evaluation by the next appropriate deadline as prescribed by the PRB. However, the substitute requires a system to do so if the system conducts an evaluation every six years and the system's total pension liability increases to at least $100 million during a fiscal year, whereas the introduced required a public retirement system to do so if the system's total assets increase in a fiscal year to above at least $30 million or $100 million, as applicable.
The substitute establishes that a public retirement system subject to a statutorily-prescribed evaluation requirement remains subject to the same requirement unless both the total assets and the total pension liability of the system decrease to an amount that is below the minimum amount prescribed by the applicable requirement, whereas the introduced established that a system that has completed an evaluation pursuant to applicable requirements provided under applicable state law remains subject to the requirement based on total pension liability.
The substitute includes provisions absent from the introduced that do the following:
·removes the specification that the substantially completed draft of an evaluation report an applicable firm must submit to a system be a preliminary draft; and
·includes definitions for "evaluation schedule" and "total pension liability."
The substitute omits a provision included in the introduced requiring a report of the first evaluation of a public retirement system to be filed with the PRB not later than September 1, 2026.
Honorable Stan Lambert, Chair, House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB3474 by Lambert (Relating to the evaluation and reporting of investment practices and performance of certain public retirement systems.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Government Code as it relates to the evaluation and reporting of investment practices and performance of certain public retirement systems. No significant impact to the state is anticipated from implementing the provisions of the bill.
Local Government Impact
According to the Texas County and District Retirement System and the Texas Municipal Retirement System, no fiscal impact is anticipated from implementing the provisions of the bill.
HB3474 is effective immediately and fundamentally changes the compliance trigger for Investment Practices and Performance Evaluations (IPPE) from an asset-only model to one that includes Total Pension Liability (TPL). Public retirement systems with TPL exceeding $100M must now accelerate to a 3-year evaluation cycle regardless of asset size, and statutory review timelines have been repealed in favor of a forthcoming schedule from the State Pension Review Board (PRB). Implementation Timeline Effective Date: May 29, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Q
Who authored HB3474?
HB3474 was authored by Texas Representative Stan Lambert during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB3474 signed into law?
HB3474 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 29, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB3474?
HB3474 is enforced by State Pension Review Board.
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB3474?
The compliance urgency for HB3474 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB3474?
The cost impact of HB3474 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB3474 address?
HB3474 addresses topics including retirement systems, retirement systems--general and state pension review board.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.