Relating to the control by lethal means of white-tailed deer in certain areas.
ModeratePlan for compliance
Low Cost
Effective:2025-06-22
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date:June 22, 2025 (Passed with supermajority; immediate effect).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. Any lethal control operations conducted after June 22, 2025, must adhere to these new permit requirements.
Agency Rulemaking: The Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission (TPWC) is authorized to adopt rules regarding electronic permit issuance, reporting, and specific means/methods. Warning: A "regulatory gray zone" exists between the effective date and the final publication of TPWD administrative rules. Do not proceed until TPWD releases the specific application forms.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Insurance Audit: Immediately review General Liability policies for exclusions related to "intentional acts" or "firearms/archery discharge." Secure riders if necessary.
2.Commission Data: Contract a biologist to perform a population density survey or habitat impact study now, so data is ready when TPWD opens the application portal.
3.Draft Protocols: Create a "Lethal Control Standard Operating Procedure" (SOP) that defines safety zones, hours of operation, and notification procedures for residents/students.
4.Monitor TPWD: Assign a compliance officer to watch the *Texas Register* for TPWD's proposed rules regarding the electronic application process.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Vendor Agreements: Service agreements with wildlife control professionals must be amended to explicitly reference Subchapter H, Chapter 43, Parks and Wildlife Code.
Indemnification: Update indemnity clauses to protect the POA or Institution against claims arising from the discharge of firearms or archery equipment in populated areas.
Compensation Structure: The law now explicitly permits paying vendors for this service. Ensure payment terms are tied to regulatory compliance (proper disposal/reporting), not just volume of animals taken.
Hiring/Training
Biologist Assessment: You must hire or contract a qualified biologist *before* applying. The law requires "evidence" of habitat damage or overpopulation.
Vendor Vetting: Ensure contracted personnel hold valid state credentials for lethal control. Under this statute, general pest control licenses may not suffice without the specific TPWD permit.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Sworn Applications: The initial application is a sworn affidavit. Legal counsel must review the "evidence of infeasibility" of recreational hunting before submission to avoid perjury risks.
Operational Logs: Establish a logbook to track:
Date/Time of control activities.
Number of deer taken.
Disposition of carcasses (e.g., donation receipts).
Fees & Costs
Permit Reinstatement Fee: A new fee will be established by TPWD rule for reinstating suspended permits.
Operational Costs: Budget for professional biologist surveys (pre-application) and increased insurance premiums for liability coverage regarding lethal activities.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Feasibility" of Recreational Hunting: The statute allows lethal control only if recreational hunting is "not feasible." TPWD has not yet defined the metrics for "feasible." Risk: If you apply for a permit without documenting *why* a standard hunt is impossible (e.g., safety setbacks, deed restrictions), your application will likely be denied.
Carcass Disposal: The bill leaves the "disposition of the wildlife" to agency rulemaking. It is currently unclear if meat donation is mandatory or if other disposal methods are permitted.
Safety Inspections: TPWD may inspect for "threats to public safety." The criteria for what constitutes a safety threat during a control operation are currently undefined.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
According to a 2006 publication by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) on managing deer populations in suburban areas, overabundant deer populations may lead to increased vehicle collisions with deer, disease transmission, and habitat degradation. A Texas Landowners Association article based on 2019 data indicates that, in the areas of Texas most heavily populated with deer, there can be as many as 293 deer per 1,000 acres. TPWD is authorized under current law to issue various permits to take protected wildlife, including a depredation permit, but eligibility for such a permit is limited. The bill author informed the committee that other programs administered by TPWD, such as the managed lands deer program, provide a structured approach to deer population management but do not permit certain effective culling methods that are permitted under a depredation permit, and, as a result, entities that are unable to obtain a depredation permit may face persistent overpopulation challenges that strain conservation efforts. C.S.H.B. 2842 seeks to provide a safe and controlled solution for deer management in certain areas while broadening access to responsible wildlife management practices in Texas by authorizing political subdivisions, state and federal agencies, public institutions of higher education, and property owners' associations to apply for a TPWD-administered depredation permit to address overpopulation in areas where deer are damaging the habitats of endangered or threatened species or where recreational hunting is not feasible.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2842 amends the Parks and Wildlife Code to require a political subdivision, a state agency, a federal agency, a public institution of higher education, or a property owners' association that desires to control by lethal means a white-tailed deer population to submit to the Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) written notice of evidence demonstrating the following:
·the use of lethal means is necessary to prevent the deer from damaging the habitat of one or more species listed by the U.S. Department of the Interior or a state agency as endangered or threatened; or
·the entity is experiencing an overpopulation of deer on property the entity owns or manages and recreational hunting is not feasible for controlling the deer population.
The bill defines "property owners' association" by reference to the meaning assigned to that term by statutory provisions regarding the construction and enforcement of restrictive covenants. The bill includes rules governing the means, methods, times, and locations of killing protected wildlife among the rules that the Parks and Wildlife Commission may adopt to implement provisions relating to permits to control protected wildlife.
C.S.H.B. 2842 authorizes TPWD, on receiving such notice, to inspect the habitat or property referenced in the notice for the following purposes:
·assessing deer management plans in the habitat relating to one or more endangered or threatened species; or
·determining whether the entity is experiencing an overpopulation of white-tailed deer on the property and whether recreational hunting for controlling the deer population is feasible.
C.S.H.B. 2842 changes the provision authorizing a person who has evidence of damage by depredation or threat to public safety to file with TPWD an application for a permit to kill protected wildlife to provide that an authorized representative of a political subdivision, a state agency, a federal agency, an institution of higher education, or a property owners' association may also file such a permit. The bill includes among the required contents of the application a statement of facts relating to, as applicable, the feasibility of recreational hunting or the need to control overpopulation to prevent damage to the habitat of one or more endangered or threatened species.
C.S.H.B. 2842 exempts the following from statutory provisions relating to hunting for hire:
·a political subdivision, a state agency, a federal agency, an institution of higher education, or a property owners' association that employs a person for compensation or promise of compensation to control by lethal means white-tailed deer as authorized under a permit issued under applicable statutory provisions; and
·a person employed by such an entity.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
C.S.H.B. 2842 differs from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways by conforming to certain bill drafting conventions.
HB2842 explicitly authorizes Property Owners' Associations (POAs), higher education institutions, and political subdivisions to contract for the lethal control of white-tailed deer, bypassing standard recreational hunting restrictions. This legislation creates a new, regulated pathway for entities facing overpopulation or endangered species habitat degradation to hire professional vendors for wildlife management, effective immediately. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: June 22, 2025 (Passed with supermajority; immediate effect).
Q
Who authored HB2842?
HB2842 was authored by Texas Representative Erin Zwiener during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB2842 signed into law?
HB2842 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 22, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB2842?
HB2842 is enforced by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB2842?
The compliance urgency for HB2842 is rated as "moderate". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB2842?
The cost impact of HB2842 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB2842 address?
HB2842 addresses topics including animals, parks & wildlife, parks & wildlife--general, parks & wildlife--hunting & fishing and parks & wildlife commission.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.