Relating to the issuance of certain protective orders for certain burglary offenses.
LowStandard timeline
Low Cost
Effective:2025-05-29
Enforcing Agencies
Texas Criminal Courts • Offices of the Attorney Representing the State (District and County Attorneys)
01
Compliance Analysis
Key implementation requirements and action items for compliance with this legislation
Implementation Timeline
Effective Date: May 29, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Compliance Deadline:Immediate. You must honor these protective orders and associated lease termination requests as of today.
Agency Rulemaking: None required. The statute is self-executing through the Texas courts; do not wait for agency guidance.
Immediate Action Plan
1.Issue a Memo to Leasing Managers: Explicitly instruct them that burglary victims with Chapter 7B orders are entitled to penalty-free lease termination effective immediately.
2.Update Security Access Lists: Ensure front-desk security knows to flag these new offenders, who may not be previous partners or spouses of the employee.
3.Review Insurance: Notify your carrier regarding potential changes to premises liability exposure, as you are now on formal notice of third-party criminal threats.
4.Audit Pending Collections: Cease any debt collection activities against former tenants for lease-break fees if they previously submitted documentation regarding a burglary that aligns with this new statute.
Operational Changes Required
Contracts
Residential Leases: While lease templates do not need immediate rewriting, enforcement protocols must change. Lease clauses imposing reletting fees or acceleration of rent are now void for tenants presenting a protective order citing Burglary of a Habitation (Penal Code § 30.02).
Security Vendor Agreements: Update Post Orders to authorize security personnel to act on Chapter 7B orders involving burglary suspects, who may be strangers to the victim rather than domestic partners.
Hiring/Training
Leasing Staff: Train onsite managers immediately. They must stop rejecting lease termination requests for burglary victims. Failure to comply violates Texas Property Code § 92.0161.
Human Resources: Update workplace violence training. Intake teams must recognize that a protective order for "burglary" carries the same legal weight and workplace safety implications as those for sexual assault or stalking.
Reporting & Record-Keeping
Verification: Compliance officers must verify the protective order explicitly references Chapter 7B, Code of Criminal Procedure and the underlying offense of Burglary (Penal Code § 30.02).
Incident Logging: Security logs must differentiate these orders. Unlike domestic violence cases, the perpetrator may not be a known associate of the employee/tenant, requiring reliance on physical descriptions or mugshots rather than name recognition.
Fees & Costs
Revenue Impact: Landlords must absorb the cost of vacancy and turnover for these early terminations; you cannot charge the tenant.
Lock Changes: Under Property Code § 92.017, tenants with these orders may request immediate lock changes.
Strategic Ambiguities & Considerations
"Habitation" vs. "Building": The law applies strictly to burglary of a *habitation* (where a person lives). It does not apply to burglary of a commercial building. However, the resulting protective order can legally ban the offender from the victim's *place of employment*. Do not confuse the location of the crime with the location of the restriction.
Retroactivity: The law does not specify if it applies to burglaries committed prior to May 29, 2025. However, standard legal practice dictates that if a judge issues the *Order* after the effective date, businesses must honor it regardless of when the crime occurred.
Need Help Understanding Implementation?
Our government affairs experts can walk you through this bill's specific impact on your operations.
Information presented is for general knowledge only and is provided without warranty, express or implied. Consult qualified government affairs professionals and legal counsel before making compliance decisions.
Current law provides for protective orders for victims of certain sexual assault, stalking, and trafficking offenses. However, the bill author has informed the committee that when someone breaks into a home, even with the intent to commit another felony offense such as sexual assault, the victim is not entitled to a protective order. C.S.H.B. 2596 seeks to help victims who experience such a burglary be able to feel safe in their own homes by extending the existing authorization for certain victims to file and obtain a protective order to the victim of a burglary of a habitation.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2596 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to extend the authorization for a victim of certain sexual, stalking, or trafficking offenses to file an application for a protective order without regard to the relationship between the applicant and the alleged offender to a victim of first or second degree felony burglary of a habitation. Accordingly, the bill extends the following to a person who is a victim of that burglary conduct:
·the authorization for any adult, acting on behalf of a victim of such an offense who is younger than 18 years of age or an adult ward, or a prosecuting attorney acting on behalf of such a victim to file an application for such a protective order; and
·the requirement for the state's attorney, following the offender's conviction of or placement on deferred adjudication community supervision for those offenses, if an application for such a protective order has not been filed, to promptly file the application on behalf of each victim.
C.S.H.B. 2596 also includes that burglary offense among the conduct or offenses, as applicable, that trigger the following:
·the authorization for a court to issue a temporary ex parte order for the protection of the applicant or the applicant's family or household member without further notice to the alleged offender and without a hearing if the court finds that there is a clear and present danger of the conduct to the applicant;
·the requirements for a court to find whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant is a victim of such an offense and issue a protective order including that finding if it makes such a finding;
·the consideration of an offender's conviction of or placement on deferred adjudication community supervision for such an offense as such reasonable grounds; and
·the requirement for a court to issue a protective order effective for the duration of the lives of the offender and victim with respect to an offender who is convicted of or placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for such an offense and required to register for life under the sex offender registration program.
The bill authorizes a victim of that burglary offense who is 18 years of age or older or a parent or guardian acting on behalf of such a victim who is younger than 18 years or age or an adult ward to file at any time an application with the court to rescind a protective order.
C.S.H.B. 2596 extends to a victim of that burglary offense certain additional rights of a victim of certain sexual, stalking, or trafficking offenses relating to the filing of an application for a protective order under applicable state law.
C.S.H.B. 2596 establishes that, to the extent of any conflict, the bill prevails over another bill of the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, relating to nonsubstantive additions to and corrections in enacted codes.
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2025.
COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2596 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
While both the introduced and the substitute extend the authorization for a victim of certain sexual, stalking, or trafficking offenses to file an application for a protective order without regard to the relationship between the applicant and the alleged offender to a victim of first degree felony burglary of a habitation, the versions differ as follows:
·the introduced included as the condition on the authorization that the actor committed the burglary with intent to commit one of the applicable sexual, stalking, or trafficking offenses, whereas the substitute does not include this condition; and
·the substitute also extends the authorization to a victim of second degree felony burglary of a habitation, whereas the introduced did not.
Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB2596 by Metcalf (Relating to the issuance of certain protective orders for certain burglary offenses.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to allow victims of certain burglary offenses to file an application for a protective order if the alleged offender committed the offense with the intent to commit certain other offenses.
According to the Office of Court Administration (OCA), although the bill may generate new case filings for protective orders, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: b > td >
JMc, MGol, DA, NTh
Related Legislation
Explore more bills from this author and on related topics
Effective immediately, HB2596 expands Chapter 7B protective orders to include victims of burglary of a habitation. This statutory change triggers automatic downstream effects in the Texas Property Code, requiring residential landlords to permit penalty-free lease terminations for burglary victims and mandating employers to enforce workplace access restrictions against a new class of criminal offenders. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: May 29, 2025 (Immediate effect due to supermajority vote).
Q
Who authored HB2596?
HB2596 was authored by Texas Representative William Metcalf during the Regular Session.
Q
When was HB2596 signed into law?
HB2596 was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 29, 2025.
Q
Which agencies enforce HB2596?
HB2596 is enforced by Texas Criminal Courts and Offices of the Attorney Representing the State (District and County Attorneys).
Q
How urgent is compliance with HB2596?
The compliance urgency for HB2596 is rated as "low". Businesses and organizations should review the requirements and timeline to ensure timely compliance.
Q
What is the cost impact of HB2596?
The cost impact of HB2596 is estimated as "low". This may vary based on industry and implementation requirements.
Q
What topics does HB2596 address?
HB2596 addresses topics including crimes, crimes--against persons, crimes--against persons--sexual, burglary and protective orders.
Legislative data provided by LegiScanLast updated: November 25, 2025
Need Strategic Guidance on This Bill?
Need help with Government Relations, Lobbying, or compliance? JD Key Consulting has the expertise you're looking for.