| COMPARISON OF INTRODUCED AND SUBSTITUTE While C.S.H.B. 3071 may differ from the introduced in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill. The substitute narrows the applicability of the introduced version's provisions to a facility that is located in: ·a county with a population of more than 2.1 million; and ·the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the county's principal municipality with a population of more than 900,000. Whereas the substitute requires the TCEQ to cancel a permit issued for a municipal solid waste landfill facility only if both of the following conditions are satisfied, the introduced required the TCEQ to do so under satisfaction of either of these conditions: ·the facility has not accepted waste for a period of 25 consecutive years; or ·if the permit was issued to the owner of the facility, the person to whom the permit was issued no longer owns the facility. The substitute includes a prohibition that was not in the introduced against the TCEQ, if it cancels a permit under the bill's provisions, approving a subsequent permit application for a municipal solid waste landfill facility that was the subject of the cancelled permit. Whereas the introduced established that the cancellation of a permit issued for a municipal solid waste landfill facility with respect to an applicable change of ownership applies only to the transfer of ownership of a municipal solid waste facility that occurs on or after the bill's effective date, the substitute establishes that a certain provision, as added by the bill, applies only to the transfer of ownership of a municipal solid waste facility that occurs on or after the bill's effective date. |